Mafiascum.net

Why do you keep claiming VT so early? You should know better.

This is the second time I've done it, ever.

It was still pointless. The kind of stupid "oh, I'll wing it, I haven't thought that far ahead" reaction test that people so love these days.

Can I get someone interested in this lovely JacobSavage wagon? No? How about with the fact that he's questioning Espeonage about why he chose to do something here that was obviously a premade decision and that has nothing to do with his alignment? He's asking him why he chose to claim VT PRIOR TO THE START OF THE GAME. Oh, I don't know, the answer "because Espeonage is an idiot" might be relevant to his alignment before he even gets a role PM. You can judge someone on WHY they choose to follow the decision they made on an isolated, no-role-PM context, but not on why they made the decision in the first place and it should be obvious why.

Discussing CES Today is a waste of time.

SSK has a far more developed meta assessment of me than I expected. Where've you been hiding? Bring Natirasha over and vote with the cool kids.

In post 641, TheIrishPope wrote:Seeeeeeeriously
Why is every single player acting scummy except for maybe Tierce

I know, it's a terrible burden.

In post 677, Tierce wrote:It was still pointless. The kind of stupid "oh, I'll wing it, I haven't thought that far ahead" reaction test that people so love these days.

Can I get someone interested in this lovely JacobSavage wagon? No? How about with the fact that he's questioning Espeonage about why he chose to do something here that was obviously a premade decision and that has nothing to do with his alignment? He's asking him why he chose to claim VT PRIOR TO THE START OF THE GAME. Oh, I don't know, the answer "because Espeonage is an idiot" might be relevant to his alignment before he even gets a role PM. You can judge someone on WHY they choose to follow the decision they made on an isolated, no-role-PM context, but not on why they made the decision in the first place and it should be obvious why.

Discussing CES Today is a waste of time.

SSK has a far more developed meta assessment of me than I expected. Where've you been hiding? Bring Natirasha over and vote with the cool kids.

Tierce!

First off, I've done too much meta research on you for my own good.

Secondly, I just don't feel as if the JacobSavage wagon is viable today. What do you think of Esp?

Oh, also, why do you think discussing CES today is a waste of time? He at least needs to be discussed.

I would never lynch CES day1. Have to at least let him night kill me first.

In post 679, MafiaSSK wrote:

In post 677, Tierce wrote:It was still pointless. The kind of stupid "oh, I'll wing it, I haven't thought that far ahead" reaction test that people so love these days.

Can I get someone interested in this lovely JacobSavage wagon? No? How about with the fact that he's questioning Espeonage about why he chose to do something here that was obviously a premade decision and that has nothing to do with his alignment? He's asking him why he chose to claim VT PRIOR TO THE START OF THE GAME. Oh, I don't know, the answer "because Espeonage is an idiot" might be relevant to his alignment before he even gets a role PM. You can judge someone on WHY they choose to follow the decision they made on an isolated, no-role-PM context, but not on why they made the decision in the first place and it should be obvious why.

Discussing CES Today is a waste of time.

SSK has a far more developed meta assessment of me than I expected. Where've you been hiding? Bring Natirasha over and vote with the cool kids.

Tierce!

First off, I've done

way

too much meta research on you for my own good.

Secondly, I just don't feel as if the JacobSavage wagon is viable today. What do you think of Esp?

Oh, also, why do you think discussing CES today is a waste of time? He at least needs to be discussed.

SSK!

We can still conjure up a wagon. Less feelings about viability, more votin' him. Let's make it viable in our hour of need.

CES is a tough nut to crack and would only end in a deadline lynch on someone else that is not Mr. Savage because people would be all waffly about Mr. Nibbler's one-liners. Discussing CES would be a distraction and not really help Today's resolution, because THAT lynch is not viable at all (hint: I'm not in it, it ain't happening). Besides, courtesy and what chamber said~ I can't read himwell enough to make a decision on D1, better to accept him as Town until I start reaching for the tinfoil headgear.

Espeonage is an idiot and probably a Town one. Of all the compromise options, it's the least bad one due to the claim, but I'd rather be lynching scum.

In post 673, Shadoweh wrote:

##Vote: TIP

Your posts are literally trolling and eating popcorn while watching everyone else think, while your vote sits uselessly on a dead wagon. Get food poisoning and die.
shos no. That is the opposite of a thing that's going to happen

Surprisingly there does sound like some support for CES? chamber's dropped in a few times but hasn't commented on it. >_> CHAMBER ON A SCALE OF YES TO NO HOW MUCH LYNCHING WOULD YOU GIVE CES THIS GAME?

I audibly laughed!
note how she doesn't have any reasons!
and how her logic is flawed!
if you're town, seriously step up your game

Then Eöl rode off in haste, and he was filled with hatred of all the Noldor; for he perceived now that Maeglin and Aredhel were fleeing to Gondolin. And driven by anger and the shame of his humiliation he crossed the Fords of Aros and rode hard upon the way that they had gone before; but though they knew not that he followed them, and he had the swiftest steed, he came never in sight of them until they reached the Brithiach, and abandoned their horses. Then by ill fate they were betrayed; for the horses neighed loudly, and Eöl's steed heard them, and sped towards them; and Eöl saw from afar the white raiment of Aredhel, and marked which way she went, seeking the secret path into the mountains.

VOTE COUNT 1:16

Shadoweh

- 1 - PeregrineV

Natirasha

- 1 - Desperado

Espeonage

- 6 - SpyreX, Cogito Ergo Sum, sirdanilot, MafiaSSK, ActionDan, shos

sirdanilot

- 1 - Albert B. Rampage

JacobSavage

- 2 - Tierce, Elscouta

MafiaSSK

- 2 - chamber, TheIrishPope

PeregrineV

- 1 - Aegor

TheIrishPope

- 3 - Natirasha, Shadoweh, Espeonage

Not voting (1)

: JacobSavage

With 18 players alive it takes

10

votes to lynch.
Deadline is in

(expired on 2014-01-23 01:00:00)

.

In post 682, TheIrishPope wrote: note how she doesn't have any reasons!
and how her logic is flawed!
if you're town, seriously step up your game

How can I have no reason and my reason be wrong at the same time? You sound like a whining 4-year old.

Tierce did you just not so subtly call my wagon bad. =_= Why. Active lurking is way worse then just lurking. Besides, you can say you made a decision before a game started all you want, but the minute you actually get a role pm it changes your mind for you. That and in theory if you were scum you'd probably be lying about the original reasoning.

I'm very, very tired game.

I'd also love something to happen. In my heart of hearts losing steam looking for the perfect lynch instead of being happy with a good lynch is the mindkiller.

I did say a role PM can change your mind on how you act, but inquiring about the initial, rolePMless reasoning is just faking scumhunting. It's something that has no relevance to the game.

I'm pretty sure I've been calling your wagon bad ever since I said that Reck's description of SpyreX made sense for a Town player who didn't realize why SpyreX is acting this way (hint: it's my fault). You're accusing TheIrishPope of being incompetent, not scum.

SpySpy! Good AND perfect lynch right here.

Jacob?

I'm morally behind you on that mostly. His is the kind of madness I can almost see the patterns behind though.

Except for the part where you started it in the first place because he felt off to you! Where does he describe Spyrex, I don't see that anywhere, just him voting Spyrex in RVS and then flipping out because you voted him and appealing his flips from unrelated games to you.

Yeah, I started it on RVS and changed my mind. Crazy, that.

Reck describes Town-SpyreX as needing none of this acting toward Espeonage. I'm on a tablet, not about to look up the post number. Scum Reck would have no issue letting SpyreX go to town on weak players.

In post 401, Desperado wrote:@ Tierce: Righteously indignant town Tierce is my favorite Tierce. I don't agree with your Jacob push; who else is scum?

What changed? And why no reaction to me saying you were reaching?

The deadline got closer and I don't want to lynch Esp or SSK.

And reaching with what, the Nat thing?

I dont like these wagons. Gonna be a NL.

In post 693, Desperado wrote:And reaching with what, the Nat thing?

Yes. You just dropped off Natirasha without a word. Compromising is one thing, ignoring that you were called out on a bad case is another.

In post 695, Tierce wrote:Yes. You just dropped off Natirasha without a word. Compromising is one thing, ignoring that you were called out on a bad case is another.

I still believe in it. Nat's recent insistence that SSK will "have his back" is even weirder than the way he was treating SSK earlier in the day.

In post 694, shos wrote:I dont like these wagons. Gonna be a NL.

Soooooooooooo useless... A lynch is still possible, although whether it is advisable is another issue.

In post 676, Espeonage wrote:This is the second time I've done it, ever.

Did you die the first time? Please tell me they killed you the first time. You deserve nothing but death for this.

In post 685, Desperado wrote:

Unvote
Vote: Jacob

Are you scum trying to distract us from the esp wagon, or are you town just having trouble to decide which scum to kill first? JS isn't a half-bad choice though.

aegor wrote:Soooooooooooo useless... A lynch is still possible, although whether it is advisable is another issue.

Aegor you're scum too I presume? Ces Aegor Esp JS? Hahahahahaha what a scum.



Let's see if this wagon works

@Sirdan: I got endgamed. But as I said, claiming VT early was in context for that game.