Mafiascum.net

I like Zdenek. His approach to the game just seems natural and I like most of what he said. I also like the fake vig. It looked fine to me, I was surprised it worked and I thought Chemist's reaction seemed genuine. Idk how often those are pulled, but how often do scum use that as a gambit? And how often do they pull it off successfully? The chances of that being the case here do not seem very high to me.

I don't like ThAdmiral. I didn't like the way he approached the bjc situation. His vote on him doesn't bother me as much as the fact that he seemed frustrated that bjc would get away with town reads, the only reason to be frustrated about that is if he's scum. IDk why town would express being so annoyed at bjc and the claim. His whole position on the matter doesn't make sense to me. Aside that there's nothing in his posts that make me lean town on him. Oh, also, I'm not thrilled about his reaction to the fake Vig. One second he was voting Z. the other he's kneeling before him praising the gambit. Too much.

I'm having a hard time shaking off my Damon scum read. I disagree with most of his reads and in general his posts just sound fake and lazy to me. I was kinda starting to like his #624, especially this part:

"

Stop telling me that these bigger and better fish exist, and start telling me who they are

and giving me convincing reasons to vote for them. You see, the more the day goes on and I see people (including myself) struggling for scumreads and struggling to know where to go,

the more I'm convinced that the majority of the scum in fact lie among these lurkers

."

That is, until it got to the red part. I like that he seems to feel kinda lost, overwhelmed even, but I don't like that he points towards the lurkers. And I liked that it looked like he was pressuring matt for reads (green), but then he's like "give me reasons to vote people!".

I ISO'ed these last two, Zdenek's read is based only on posts until page 10 (more or less). I'm leaving the heavy re-reading for tomorrow.

Snow, what do you think of PV?
And also your take on bjc.

In post 676, pisskop wrote:Snow, what do you think of PV?
And also your take on bjc.

I have no read on PV. Actually I have no reads on a lot of people, either because they didn't post much when I was around or because I'm finding them hard to read (like talah and mastim).

About bjc. I'm leaning town on him. Mostly because of all the flak he's gotten.

Meh. Time for an updated scum list.

@PK: Nothing like a good attack to get my blood flowing I guess. lol.



The Greys are here! They are likely to invade my scum pool with not very much prompting! If I have to lynch a Grey I will!!

Nero when he is town trolls and is very active. I was aware he was V/LA before, now he is not. Hence my vote.

it has been hard to get into this game with being sick. I am going to the doc tomorrow, hopefully will be able to do some ISOs this weekend.

In post 530, bjc wrote:And if I'm content with lurking?

Is everyone still townreading him?

In post 648, projectmatt wrote:If anything, I believe his refusal to play seriously under pressure actually kind of solidifies my townread of him.

In post 677, SnowStorm wrote:About bjc. I'm leaning town on him. Mostly because of all the flak he's gotten.

Fucking hell.

In post 582, Mister Rogers wrote:I mean I kind of just stumbled onto this but its really kind of bizarre how this all went down and you both end up taking the exact same tact. Is there any explanation for this?

We're not neighbors...we're lovers!

btw I am actually keeping up with this game but I'm at work and can't really post at length.

I am certain there is/are player(s) in my town pile that are fooling me atm. I think the key is finding the true scum that is not fooling me from my list.

Anx is nice because it would help me with my Thad read.

DG is not too bad and would at least help me with my Mastin read but there a number of other player interactions as well.

Rach will be impossible to lynch but has only cut scum as far as I can tell.

BUT WAIT!!! I just checked her ISO and she seems so so so very active on site elsewhere! She's right there congratulating scum on a good game etc etc.

At work gotta check this out.

Meh. False alarm there with Rach.

Looking for a good lurker lynch? Luca is the very very best. I don't think those that are currently voting Luca should be given very much credit at all for it because tunneling a lurker is no place for a townie to be.

I think its far better to target lurker voters. Hence my short list (minus Rach who is truly sick after a trip):

Talah, Anx, DG

We need to burn one of these three.

In post 521, bjc wrote:Are you voting me because you think I'm scummy or just to be stupid?

Are you lurking because you're scum or just stupid?

In post 530, bjc wrote:And if I'm content with lurking?

Ohh...

In post 649, projectmatt wrote:How do you make the distinction between "intentionally" lurking and "simply" lurking?

Are you familiar with the Beetlejuice tell? Also, to ask this question a different way, How do make the distinction between "intentionally" lurking and "simply" lurking?

While I'm not voting bjc purely for lurking, I'm okay with having my vote on a lurker. Do you have a problem with that?

In post 288, projectmatt wrote:Vote: Aptil

Guess not.

In post 611, PeregrineV wrote:Out of the high posters, cases require more validity. Only ones I'd really consider at this point are talah and pisskop.

I would consider a pisskop scum case.

In post 612, talah wrote:He's not inaccessible and has a rather 'fuck you'-ish attitude which I like.

What do you like about the "fuck you -ish attitude?" Do you think scum don't get "fuck you -ish?"

I also found this statement to be surprising because I agreed with this:

In post 612, talah wrote:Oh and the last couple of posts from matt made my brain feel like it was out of sync with the universe.

In post 613, Mister Rogers wrote:What bigger fish like Aptil??

Why is your push here so fake??????????????

In post 638, talah wrote:Do you have information that Luca really *is* having RL issues which are affecting his ability to post - anything at all?

Don't even go there. I will see you hanged if you continue along this path.

In post 657, Damon_Gant wrote:List of people I consider to be lurkers:
SnowStorm, aptil, Rach, bjc,

Yates

Another one accusing me of this?? WTF... Anyone calling me a "lurker" needs to check themselves. I have more CONTENT than you, Gant.

In post 668, AngryPidgeon wrote:Its not much, but I have nero as a townlean for his reaction to my post.

Wow. Am I missing some meta thing between you two??

I have scum read each of these 3 independently of their voting for Luca and it just so happens it is a pretty major coincidence that they all synched up together on the same target.

Talah was the last to do so and I think the most criminal and especially because he is a highly skilled player.

Anx was the second to do so and seeing as how he has remained there and refused to budge or scum hunt makes him look pretty bad.

DG had his chance but his promise of "eyeballing everyone" was a bunch of crap and goes beyond just being "rusty".

There is somebody in my Grey pile that is so so so very close to turning red....

Can you guess who it is?

Can it be thad? If I ask nicely?

lol.

Interesting you would pop up there with that statement.

MR:
Are you really comparing THIS game to a Newbie game that just ended where I congratulated the scum team for a win? Seriously? A comment that does not require concentration?

Did you read that I also stated that I was sorry I was not able to do a better job on convincing Bo (the IC) that Jingle was the remaining scum due to being sick?

In post 689, Mister Rogers wrote:Interesting you would pop up there with that statement.

Was I right?

How badly do you want to be right?

@Rach: You are off the hook in my mind. I see genuine illness.

Oh and gosh, hope you feel better soon and like remains non-serious.

Yate's analysis is so completely fake and devoid of substance that it hurts.

Wow so dinner is over right?

It is! I had stromboli ;D

Wow that sounds yummy.

It was delicious. But do you know what isn't delicious? Mafia.