Mafiascum.net

I see now, you were referring to this.

↑ Nosferatu wrote:Finished reading up, LaHo is probably scum, don't necessarily see Titus's reasons for it.

pip looks a lot better.

not liking lhix; I'm having trouble reading his sudden mood swings, feels like I'm listening to a girl on her period

idk how I feel about Titus v Farside looks kind of TvT to me

would like for mala pig and kop to post more

Aqua and Yakko read town to me.

Even assuming Nos was concerned by your observation (considering neither you nor anyone else followed it up IIRC this is not necessarily true) I don't think anybody says "Nosferatu is coaching Malakittens... and Pignash... and Pisskop". Both on the grounds that it's totally possible to conceal one scumbuddy among three targets, and that it would be ridiculous for Nos to "coach" Mala and Pisskop.

Aqua, I said NoS was coaching LoHa telling him to scumhunt. NoS, seeing I perceived that, is highly unlikely to repeat that his buddy needs to post more. It's not about whether the assessment is true but rather him avoiding links.

↑ Titus wrote:Aqua, I said NoS was coaching LoHa telling him to scumhunt. NoS, seeing I perceived that, is highly unlikely to repeat that his buddy needs to post more. It's not about whether the assessment is true but rather him avoiding links.

I don't think there was anything much *to* say about Pisskop, Pig or Mala at that point besides "I wish they'd post more". In fact, if there was nothing but that to say about a scumbuddy, concealing it within a group of similar townies is pretty much exactly how I'd expect it to be said.

I'm not arguing Pisskop or Mala are likely scum but the point's weak.

Aqua, wasn't my Loha point "weak" too?

↑ Titus wrote:Aqua, wasn't my Loha point "weak" too?

Yes. Yes it was. Still is, in fact.

Let's not get into that, shall we?
I'm sure we both have all sorts of uncomplimentary things to say about the other's play.

↑ Aquanim wrote:Let's not get into that, shall we?
I'm sure we both have all sorts of uncomplimentary things to say about the other's play.

I wasn't trying to make this personal but just asking for your vote because I was right before and you were wrong. Your vote should help sort Farside and show who is right or wrong.

↑ Titus wrote:
...just asking for your vote because I was right before and you were wrong.

That's not how this works. You convince me you're right, then you get my vote.

↑ Aquanim wrote:

↑ Titus wrote:
...just asking for your vote because I was right before and you were wrong.

That's not how this works. You convince me you're right, then you get my vote.

The evidence showed I was right. My case is stronger but you dismiss it without an alternative. Why?

Also pretty sure I never townread LoHa.

↑ Aquanim wrote:Also pretty sure I never townread LoHa.

So you randomly counter wagoned on behalf of someone you were null reading or scu reading hours before deadline?

I guess you missed the part where that was mostly a play for information...

Ugh. The fact of the matter is Titus, if we're going to have this conversation I can't help but make it personal, because my entire opinion here is personal about you. If you want to go into that, we can.

I'd prefer not to since I'm town, you almost have to be town, and so it's a complete waste of time which will shit up the thread. We can do it somewhere and someplace else, instead of inflicting it on everyone else who has to read it.

EBWOP: should be "somewhere else and some other time"

↑ Titus wrote:

↑ Aquanim wrote:Let's not get into that, shall we?
I'm sure we both have all sorts of uncomplimentary things to say about the other's play.

I wasn't trying to make this personal but just asking for your vote because I was right before and you were wrong. Your vote should help sort Farside and show who is right or wrong.

I'm Mason

Gfu

Now tell me how you think your weak point was valid

↑ Titus wrote:Oh whoever shot NoS should claim IMO.

i instantly thought we had a sk, but vig makes more sense too

Just going to say this I still say Titus point was weak and wrong.
But I don't know what to think with nos flip.
I think the best point is Soren's vote on loha as bussing.

↑ farside22 wrote:
I'm Mason

Gfu

Do you know if pignash crumed or something? I don't understand that shot and I'd like to.

↑ Aquanim wrote:

↑ farside22 wrote:
I'm Mason

Gfu

Do you know if pignash crumed or something? I don't understand that shot and I'd like to.

Not that I saw.
We have a pt we talked in and he wasn't very active in it.

Reading back a bit, Kop is another player I'd like to see more from.

↑ pisskop wrote:yakkos begging for a pl, titus is too

What are you on about. I played perfectly imho.

↑ hi im Yakko wrote:...
I played perfectly imho.

Don't we all, Yakko, don't we all.

...That made more sense in my head.

The point being that I think the large majority of players have an inflated opinion of their own play. Likely including myself.

In other news, a Vigilante claim would give me peace of mind that we're not facing an SK but I'm not sure my peace of mind is worth having the role in the open, especially if it has another shot. Use your own judgement.

↑ Aquanim wrote:...That made more sense in my head.

The point being that I think the large majority of players have an inflated opinion of their own play. Likely including myself.

In other news, a Vigilante claim would give me peace of mind that we're not facing an SK but I'm not sure my peace of mind is worth having the role in the open, especially if it has another shot. Use your own judgement.

True......but sometimes not true.
Just my weird mussing

While I'm thinking I wrote a note in the pt about pisskop.
I thought he read a bit pissy when he was telling loha about self hammering.

↑ pisskop wrote:So can mod modkill him for playing against his wincon and not selfvoting?

Usually town would be using the time to work things out in the game.
I sort of half wondered if both scums were on the loha wagon at the time

Can we lynch aqua? He makes my headache.

↑ Aquanim wrote:...That made more sense in my head.

The point being that I think the large majority of players have an inflated opinion of their own play. Likely including myself.

In other news, a Vigilante claim would give me peace of mind that we're not facing an SK but I'm not sure my peace of mind is worth having the role in the open, especially if it has another shot. Use your own judgement.

I can half see what your saying about the SK, but bringing out the Vigilante role out in the open uneases me, and if the vigilante comes forward, how can we prove that he is the vigilante and not a SK?

Titus, will understand the stance of what happened with that, in the first blitz game.