Page 28 of 82

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 3:41 am
by Thor665
Jeanne11 wrote:if you think we are that scummy for suggesting a lynch at deadline, then I will facepalm at you NH.

It has nothng to do with A lynch, it has everything to do with THIS lynch.
This lynch is bad, and has no case, and people are just voting it "derp, becahs DEDLIN!"
Doesn't that concern you at all?

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 3:43 am
by Thor665
I mean, I guess if he's scum this wagon will be a vast wealth of good info.
But I'm not holding my breath.

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 3:43 am
by SirCakez
Thor we have six hours. If you can get a wagon to hammer on someone else in six hours then go for it.

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 3:45 am
by Thor665
I was trying to get a wagon pushed through a few days ago so we could have a claim and discussion - and people called me scummy for pushing for a L-1 and a claim.
I was well aware that this was a potential issue and stated as much many real life days ago.

You should all move to Firebringer - even the best defense for him I have heard is "let's wait and let him prove himself" and "he's always derpy.

Here's a thought - tojam can "prove" his role with the "provable" role he'll get from Firebringer.
In addition tojam actually, y'know, doesn't just have a (as claimed by you) meta of intentioanlly not playing the game.

That makes a Firebringr lynch a win/win/win last I checked.
Which was just now.
Yup - still a win.

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 3:48 am
by Jeanne11
Let me shoot a question back at you. Does the possibility of no lynch at deadline concern you at all? If you think you could form another wagon in six hours with some members being offline, then I will applaud you.

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 3:51 am
by Thor665
Jeanne11 wrote:Let me shoot a question back at you. Does the possibility of no lynch at deadline concern you at all?

Yes.
Jeanne11 wrote: If you think you could form another wagon in six hours with some members being offline, then I will applaud you.

You're here, why don't you move?
I mean, between tojam and Firebringer - which do you think is more likely scum?

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 4:01 am
by Jeanne11
Because there is no way a sufficient number of people would move UNDER SIX HOURS!

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 4:05 am
by Thor665
So you are admitting that you do think Firebringer is more likely scum, so you are voting a stronger town read only due to the excuse of deadline - correct?

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 4:05 am
by Thor665
And if you have fear of deadline - where were you four days ago?

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 4:08 am
by Jeanne11
Well, if his wagon reaches l-1 before deadline then and only then will I join.

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 4:09 am
by Jeanne11
Also, way to twist my words. It seems to me you want to posture some more so that there is a no lynch at deadline.

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 4:10 am
by Jeanne11
As to where was I, I was on a V/LA, STUDYING.

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 4:11 am
by SirCakez
I think Tojam is more likely scum for the reasons I've already said about Fire.

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 5:31 am
by BlueBloodedToffee
Tojam wagon is ugly.

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 5:54 am
by Night Hunters
Thor665 wrote:And if you have fear of deadline - where were you four days ago?


Thor, pick a fucking viable wagon then. Yes Fire is scum. So is Jeanne. Pick the least bad one.

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 6:32 am
by Thor665
Night Hunters wrote:
Thor665 wrote:And if you have fear of deadline - where were you four days ago?


Thor, pick a Smurfing viable wagon then. Yes Fire is scum. So is Jeanne. Pick the least bad one.

One of your "scum" is currently voting alongside you on the tojam wagon, and you are voting neither of the people you are calling scum.

Which makes my vote, currently, infinitely more pro-town than yours, unless you're lying about your stated reads here.

???

Unless you really mean "pick between tojam, the player I think is probably town, and Night Hunters, a player I think is probably town, and Ari - a null lurk slot being voted with a 2/3 wagon of slots I do scum read (Cake and Guilty Lion - though i think Cake is now backin the tojam wagon, making it lookworse to me and weakening the option of the vague lurksack wagon)
Yeah, amazing that I'm not excited about the lesser of the three evils there.

@Jeanne - Not really buying that as valid reasoning to deadline push and wash your hands of wagon responsibility. You're flat out stating basic scum strategy "yeah, maybe I don't scum read them, but we need a lynch!"

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 6:34 am
by GuiltyLion
This tojam wagon is awful.

shaddowez wrote:VOTE: tojam

Won't be back any closer to deadline, and don't want a no lynch. Claim doesn't preclude scum here.


At the time of this vote, tojam and Ari were both at L-4. Shaddowez pushed Ari for scum earlier in the day. But now he votes tojam instead.

Night Hunters wrote:I have a -strong- feeling tojam is going to flip town. Their intern claim feels legit (it was unprompted but ???)

-Dad


Then why the hell did you join the tojam wagon yesterday? If tojam flips town this is literally trying to get towncred off of your own wagon.

I'll hammer tojam at deadline if nothing has moved but I think that scum is driving this lynch.

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 6:38 am
by Jeanne11
WHY IN THE NAME OF GOD ARE YOU ALL TRYING TO NO LYNCH AT DEADLINE?!

I don't normally post in all caps, but you lot are pissing me off with this bs. No lynch being bad was one of the first things I learned here. >.>

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 6:40 am
by Thor665
Jeanne11 wrote:WHY IN THE NAME OF GOD ARE YOU ALL TRYING TO NO LYNCH AT DEADLINE?!

Because people took long v/la periods and didn't come back till right at deadline ;)

:(

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 6:43 am
by Jeanne11
.......

VOTE: Thor

Okay, now you're jabbing at me intentionally. If you don't like my reasoning, lynch me. Oh, that's right, there's no time to lynch me!

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 6:58 am
by Night Hunters
I joined the toejam wagon yesterday. We get zero opportunity to communicate about our vote in the deadline scramble. We still do.

@Thor, Fire isn't happening. I would be all over Fire but it isn't because people are dumb. I would still do cakey or Jeanne.

I have no desire to no lynch and I am ok with voting anyone who might be scum.

~Titus

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 7:23 am
by Aeronaut
VC 1.21
VC 1.21

(With 13 students still enrolled, it's 7 to Lynch!)


Image
- Emmanuel College (Boston, MA) -

[L-5] Aristophanes
- GuiltyLion, ɀefiend
[L-7] BlueBloodedToffee -
[L-6] Firebringer -
Thor665
[L-7] GuiltyLion -
[L-7] Jeanne11 -
[L-7] kirroha -
[L-7] massive -
[L-5] Night Hunters -
BlueBloodedToffee, tojam2
[L-6] Thor665 -
Jeanne11
[L-6] shaddowez -
Firebringer
[L-6] SirCakez -
kirroha
[L-2] tojam2 -
massive, Aristophanes, Night Hunters, shaddowez, SirCakez
[L-7] ɀefiend -

Not Voting
-

Mod Notes:

Deadline is in 2 Hours!
SirCakez is V/LA until Wednesday

Final Exams begin in
(expired on 2016-03-12 17:20:32)

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 8:00 am
by SirCakez
This looks like a Tojam lynch or nolynch.

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 8:29 am
by Jeanne11
VOTE: tojam

There. Now someone could hammer.

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 8:32 am
by Thor665
Jeanne11 wrote:Okay, now you're jabbing at me intentionally. If you don't like my reasoning, lynch me. Oh, that's right, there's no time to lynch me!

Yes - but there is time for me to express that I find what you're doing to be scummy - which is the point of the game.

Night Hunters wrote:I have no desire to no lynch and I am ok with voting anyone who might be scum.

Yeah, I know, everyone is doing their best Pilate imitation today.