↑Jeanne11 wrote:if you think we are that scummy for suggesting a lynch at deadline, then I will facepalm at you NH.
It has nothng to do with A lynch, it has everything to do with THIS lynch.
This lynch is bad, and has no case, and people are just voting it "derp, becahs DEDLIN!"
Doesn't that concern you at all?
Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 3:43 am
by Thor665
I mean, I guess if he's scum this wagon will be a vast wealth of good info.
But I'm not holding my breath.
Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 3:43 am
by SirCakez
Thor we have six hours. If you can get a wagon to hammer on someone else in six hours then go for it.
Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 3:45 am
by Thor665
I was trying to get a wagon pushed through a few days ago so we could have a claim and discussion - and people called me scummy for pushing for a L-1 and a claim.
I was well aware that this was a potential issue and stated as much many real life days ago.
You should all move to Firebringer - even the best defense for him I have heard is "let's wait and let him prove himself" and "he's always derpy.
Here's a thought - tojam can "prove" his role with the "provable" role he'll get from Firebringer.
In addition tojam actually, y'know, doesn't just have a (as claimed by you) meta of intentioanlly not playing the game.
That makes a Firebringr lynch a win/win/win last I checked.
Which was just now.
Yup - still a win.
Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 3:48 am
by Jeanne11
Let me shoot a question back at you. Does the possibility of no lynch at deadline concern you at all? If you think you could form another wagon in six hours with some members being offline, then I will applaud you.
Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 3:51 am
by Thor665
↑Jeanne11 wrote:Let me shoot a question back at you. Does the possibility of no lynch at deadline concern you at all?
Yes.
↑Jeanne11 wrote: If you think you could form another wagon in six hours with some members being offline, then I will applaud you.
You're here, why don't you move?
I mean, between tojam and Firebringer - which do you think is more likely scum?
Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 4:01 am
by Jeanne11
Because there is no way a sufficient number of people would move UNDER SIX HOURS!
Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 4:05 am
by Thor665
So you are admitting that you do think Firebringer is more likely scum, so you are voting a stronger town read only due to the excuse of deadline - correct?
Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 4:05 am
by Thor665
And if you have fear of deadline - where were you four days ago?
Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 4:08 am
by Jeanne11
Well, if his wagon reaches l-1 before deadline then and only then will I join.
Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 4:09 am
by Jeanne11
Also, way to twist my words. It seems to me you want to posture some more so that there is a no lynch at deadline.
Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 4:10 am
by Jeanne11
As to where was I, I was on a V/LA, STUDYING.
Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 4:11 am
by SirCakez
I think Tojam is more likely scum for the reasons I've already said about Fire.
Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 5:31 am
by BlueBloodedToffee
Tojam wagon is ugly.
Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 5:54 am
by Night Hunters
↑Thor665 wrote:And if you have fear of deadline - where were you four days ago?
Thor, pick a fucking viable wagon then. Yes Fire is scum. So is Jeanne. Pick the least bad one.
↑Thor665 wrote:And if you have fear of deadline - where were you four days ago?
Thor, pick a Smurfing viable wagon then. Yes Fire is scum. So is Jeanne. Pick the least bad one.
One of your "scum" is currently voting alongside you on the tojam wagon, and you are voting neither of the people you are calling scum.
Which makes my vote, currently, infinitely more pro-town than yours, unless you're lying about your stated reads here.
???
Unless you really mean "pick between tojam, the player I think is probably town, and Night Hunters, a player I think is probably town, and Ari - a null lurk slot being voted with a 2/3 wagon of slots I do scum read (Cake and Guilty Lion - though i think Cake is now backin the tojam wagon, making it lookworse to me and weakening the option of the vague lurksack wagon)
Yeah, amazing that I'm not excited about the lesser of the three evils there.
@Jeanne - Not really buying that as valid reasoning to deadline push and wash your hands of wagon responsibility. You're flat out stating basic scum strategy "yeah, maybe I don't scum read them, but we need a lynch!"