Page 28 of 107
Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2019 9:46 pm
by Fractured
Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2019 9:46 pm
by Michael Scott
In post 671, Brigitte wrote:Ummm nothing. I am just not finding a lot of content here parsing that is helping me get reads
Me too.
Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2019 9:46 pm
by Brigitte
In post 672, Fractured wrote:I agree. I am in a similar boat, this restrained posting is weird for me to get used to. How do you feel about GuiltyLion/mbaki?
mbaki has a certain flow to his posts that make it seem natural, so nothing has given me pauses. I am not sure about GuiltyLion yet.
Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2019 9:49 pm
by Brigitte
I wonder if I just see mbaki avatar of a smiley face, and I kind of think every post has some element of troll to it and that's why I think its so natural. Ive been really trying to think how much the avatar influences my opinion on peoples personality.
Anyways, yeah I am leaning town on mbaki.
Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2019 9:53 pm
by Fractured
Talk about RadCow for a bit.
Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2019 9:53 pm
by Brigitte
No ty.
Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2019 9:58 pm
by Fractured
Understood.
Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2019 11:33 pm
by Alonzo
Lovebirds hit and run was scripted and fake.
Almost certainly in the scumchat
Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2019 11:38 pm
by Parmigiano Reggiano
In post 682, Alonzo wrote:Lovebirds hit and run was scripted and fake.
Almost certainly in the scumchat
Explain?
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2019 12:56 am
by implosion
Is the hot new scumteam Alonzo and Michael Scott?
Only time will tell
Also I think I managed to sleep basically from 1-2 am and 6-7:30 am last night argh yes thread you know you need my life story don’t lie to yourselves
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2019 12:57 am
by implosion
Michael Scott’s activity pattern so far feels scummy. I also don’t like their posts in the past two pages especially much.
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2019 1:38 am
by Michael Scott
My activity pattern on a whole isn't so good for reasons. I'm fully aware I've only posted 'meh' content so far, haven't read the thread.
Take it as temp VLA for a day.
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2019 1:39 am
by Michael Scott
Actually, shift in priorities. Gimme an hour.
Volxen's MIA too >.>
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2019 1:50 am
by Michael Scott
ISO skim leaves me with a strong townread on Fractured.
1. RVS mindmeld on townreads - I'd imagine scum would pick apart and attack one of the RVS posters, I was expecting to be called awkward for it.
2.
528 and
631 - Clear, transparent stances on things early in the game without any real need to. +town indicative.
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2019 1:53 am
by Michael Scott
In post 376, mbaki wrote:there's no answer to 375 that advances the game
VOTE: Fractured
Explain the thought progression(s) behind these votes.
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2019 1:53 am
by Fractured
wtf the quotes keep disappearing, I've tried 3 times and only one shows up when I go to preview.
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2019 1:55 am
by Michael Scott
I see a lot of shade towards Fractured but no real case? (Forgive me, still just looking at ISOs)
Sell it to me, Hobbes.
Also, how come you have virtually no comment on my slot?
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2019 1:55 am
by Michael Scott
In post 690, Fractured wrote:wtf the quotes keep disappearing, I've tried 3 times and only one shows up when I go to preview.
Anything you want to talk about? I'm here a while.
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2019 2:01 am
by Michael Scott
In post 341, Brigitte wrote:I don't know what to tell you. I am not gonna try to convince you I am town.
In post 345, Brigitte wrote:You realize I feel as though I am walking on eggshells with you right now and I don't know how to respond, right?
Townreading this. RC, I remember you said Brigitte is scum, do you still hold that? What's your case?
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2019 2:01 am
by Fractured
In post 640, implosion wrote:Gotta say reality check is like a ridiculously bad choice of person to fake dayvig?
@taly, I don’t even remember what I was referring to with the hot garbage comment. I think I just didn’t really like any votes in particular or smth. Not sure what else it is you’re asking.
We'd like to know your read on Alonzo, that is separate from people just entertaining that he could be scum.
Also, we haven't seen much rationale behind our votes, can you discuss yours and your thoughts around our wagon?
I figured this would be a bit more exciting...
Kittybells didn't vote us.
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2019 2:09 am
by Fractured
In post 685, implosion wrote:Michael Scott’s activity pattern so far feels scummy. I also don’t like their posts in the past two pages especially much.
Nothing about this indicates scum.
@Michael
A lot of people are voteparking or jumping around without any resolution to their reads.... assuming they have them.
Parm
doesn't feel like scum at all looking through his ISO. He's showing a larger depth of thought in his reads than a lot of people in the game, and I like his questioning.
I don't trust the scumreads on them as much as I don't trust that several people in this game aren't pushing townreads.
It feels too easy.
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2019 2:10 am
by Fractured
This is a boring response.
You haven't said what you wanted to come out of your vote on us or other people at the moment.
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2019 2:11 am
by Brigitte
In post 685, implosion wrote:Michael Scott’s activity pattern so far feels scummy. I also don’t like their posts in the past two pages especially much.
Activity pattern feels scummy? Expand?
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2019 2:12 am
by Brigitte
In post 684, implosion wrote:Also I think I managed to sleep basically from 1-2 am and 6-7:30 am last night argh yes thread you know you need my life story don’t lie to yourselves
Its a good life story. I would sell it to Times magazine. Might make a few million.
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2019 2:12 am
by Michael Scott
In post 695, Fractured wrote:A lot of people are voteparking or jumping around without any resolution to their reads.... assuming they have them.
Yeah, on my occasional visit to the thread I noticed this. Like nearly 30 pages and no real wagons being pushed.
Hence the questions to people to back up with their thought processes, and give me something to evaluate.