Mafiascum.net

cyrus: nightkill aimed at you or Pine tnight
me: shoot me!
me: *JKs 123456789*

Makes sense.

In post 603, PenguinPower wrote:tbf, EP probably didn't expect this explosion of activity

yes you see i am at WORK.. gosh!

vote count 2.1

123456789

(5): Pine, Elements, Skygazer, PenguinPower, skitter30

Acute Right Obtuse

(2): Channel Fireball, gobbledygook

Not Voting

(5): Menalque, Baezu Leaf, Dr Easy Bake, Acute Right Obtuse, 123456789

7 majority.
chennis head of ARO is V/LA thurs-sat.
(expired on 2019-08-22 09:06:00)

In post 675, PenguinPower wrote:cyrus: nightkill aimed at you or Pine tnight
me: shoot me!
me: *JKs 123456789*

Makes sense.

Not really

Defend the target for sure or block the possible killer...you defend the target. I told him I was fine being blocked.

Sarcasm, Pine.

Sarcasm.

You believed Cryus for his other claims, if you believed him about that you would have a 50/50 to knowingly block the shot

Pine dies and you didn’t block the kill, then you know Cyrus was telling the truth about Numbers and get Numbers the next day regardless. So what if town Pine dies? Now we have less definitive proof that Cyrus was telling the truth

Kinda like I would have by jking Pine...

Except I thought Pine would be more likely based on what I told Cyrus...

Damn my logic.

In post 681, gobbledygook wrote:Pine dies and you didn’t block the kill, then you know Cyrus was telling the truth about Numbers and get Numbers the next day regardless. So what if town Pine dies? Now we have less definitive proof that Cyrus was telling the truth

?

I think gobble is kinda scummy too

i'm also not sure if i buy into scum!numbers rn

If you’re right about Numbers and you block him making the kill you accomplish both of the objectives - saving Pine and confirming Numbers beyond a doubt.

Saving Pine makes it more likely Numbers is scum, but doesn’t prove it. Makes no sense was not appropriate. It does make sense why you did it, but I woood have done the above. Higher risk, higher reward imo

In post 684, skitter30 wrote:I think gobble is kinda scummy too

You thought wrong

so we're saying that it's known that cyrus had {some wincon different than pine's and pp's} but we don't know what it is, right?

In post 687, gobbledygook wrote:

In post 684, skitter30 wrote:I think gobble is kinda scummy too

You thought wrong

ok

your vote on cyrus was also p bad

In post 689, skitter30 wrote:

In post 687, gobbledygook wrote:

In post 684, skitter30 wrote:I think gobble is kinda scummy too

You thought wrong

ok

your vote on cyrus was also p bad

No it wasn’t

ok, why wasn't it?

Because I’m town

What makes it bad?

In post 684, skitter30 wrote:I think gobble is kinda scummy too

^

ok, why wasn't it bad from the pov of anyone that isn't you ?

that obviously isn't an argument that's going to convince me or change my opinion as is

I don’t know why people would think it’s bad. That’s why I asked you

In post 693, gobbledygook wrote:What makes it bad?

it reads like you knew your buddy was going down so you just hopped on the wagon to make sure you were on it before it got hammered

again, most of the votes in the backend of the wagon look like this tho

i think sky's is worse than yours

penguin is probably town

have no read on deb; gut is town but idk

so basically my ranking for bad votes rn is: sky > you > deb > penguin

and channel's actually does not look like that but his interactions with cyrus are bad for other reasons

Ok that’s fair