Posted: Sun Jan 05, 2020 12:47 pm
Looker, you played with Town Wimpy in Montosh’s mini normal game. Is this town Wimpy in this game?
not a single read in this entire postIn post 672, Looker wrote:We'll know when you flip...in both places.In post 512, gobbledygook wrote:That’s the second time you’ve levied that accusation against me. You sure it isn’t a playstyle difference between you and me, Looker?Again? Does Wimpy ever finish any games? (I won't look it up to see) His spam was a very effective method to keep me from reading the thread.What, did you tally up post counts or something? It's possible there's a relationship between you and DDL, but I can't say that it's scum.In post 641, Ruby Red wrote:salamence says he has some plan to win no matter what but i'm not really convinced on DDL, meta argument didn't seem very strong and his play doesn't look terrible
i think looker is easily the scummiest person in this game and it would be criminal for him not to die today
VOTE: lookerWas this someone's cue to think for you?In post 645, Salamence20 wrote:How do I feel about this, how do I feel about this?The attack was super effective.I'm sorry you have to go through that; I hope everything turns out okay.In post 671, Amrun wrote:I’m rushing my son to the ER right now so depending on the outcome I might be all over the place or just gone
Sal is town and was voting for DDL. Sal was taken off of DDL for some reason. If DDL is scum, I know who to target.
VOTE: DrDolittle
Why would scum distract Sal from voting town? To me, it would be an easy kill.
where are you at now that you're not in a giant argumentIn post 677, chamber wrote:Glad to hear it.
I still think Wimpys specific behaviour was much more likely to come from scum. I also am not a fan of parts of your entry to the game. I'm mostly waiting on DDL to get back from their VLA so they can respond to that pressure before reevaluating things. Game seems stalled on that.In post 679, Ruby Red wrote:where are you at now that you're not in a giant argumentIn post 677, chamber wrote:Glad to hear it.
In post 659, Salamence20 wrote:I could move to looker, maaaaaybe slimer.
But ummm. DDL is still optimal
also at the moment i think a slimer lynch is just straight up non optimal
I was aware because someone stated l-1. You're playing bad faith on my slot. I can check in intermittententry without serious thought, but it should be clear across activity that I'm not entirely hereIn post 644, Salamence20 wrote:People want to wait until DDL posts on Tuesday and "give him a fair chance to play."
First things first, why? If hes busy hes busy and doesn't have time to play, which he has not said here or signified by going V/LA.
And secondly, the guy has been posting, he has been paying attention, he was aware he was at L-1, hes been tunneling gobbles, and hasn't formed another scumread as of this time.
The only thing DDL is going to do is come in here, blast me for leading a wagon against him, and probably vote slimer/looker.
Im waiting on DDL, Looker isnt doing anything of note, his posting is NAI, and bugspray is mislynch bait until lylo.In post 684, Ruby Red wrote:In post 659, Salamence20 wrote:I could move to looker, maaaaaybe slimer.
But ummm. DDL is still optimalalso at the moment i think a slimer lynch is just straight up non optimal
in terms of wolfiness and in terms of removing people we want dead before it gets to late game i would vote pretty much any of ddl, looker and bugspray before slimer
why vote slimer first here?
You contradict yourself in this postIn post 694, DrDolittle wrote:When I come back I'm gonna try to look at the juice that happened in the last 4 pages and why votes shifted to gobbles despite everyone telling me gobbles is scum
Yeah Bugspray, tell him whyIn post 693, theslimer3 wrote:why though
which just seems like you are being really ungenuine.I'm saying leaning scum, but I'll admit, more recently I'm putting him closer to town