Mafiascum.net

In post 287, BBmolla wrote:

In post 280, Egix96 wrote:

In post 262, BBmolla wrote:VOTE: No Lynch

Unless half this player list is down to lynch garmr scum

I really think this is the right day 1 move just with how impossible it will be to create wagons

That doesn't seem very fun though...

If you think that Garmr is scum, there shouldn't be anything stopping you from voting him anyway...

The more posts I make the more anti town it is. No lynch is the most achievable lynch with fewest votes.

I changed my mind anyway and I’ll just be voting top voter, it won’t result in anything but it’ll make me feel vindicated.

In post 469, Drixx wrote:

In post 468, Nero Cain wrote:but there are plenty of town that post reasonless read list. Mastina for instance.

and not gonna lie, I'm still a bit salty.

What do u think of profii?

Go look at the lists KM posted. See if you can spot WHY I pushed them to explain.

At this point their follow up posts trying to dodge explaining are actually far more damning than the problem with the supposed reads.

I've got about 45 minutes till I have to go to work. I'll try and do another pass specifically on profii and see what I see.

In post 470, Hectic wrote:

Code: Select all

|O|-|-| 
|-|-|-| 
|-|-|X|

Your move.
 

In post 488, profii wrote:In terms of scum pings... I dont think it's ever going to be possible to track 6/6/1 or whatever the setup is all at once so if we are lynching scummy dudes then the game will start to resolve itself over time

In post 510, Chemist1422 wrote:

In post 371, Hectic wrote:Hey all.

There's nothing I hate more than Day 1. If you gave me the option of playing a neutral hated survivor, or Day 1, I'd pick the survivor every single time. I'll be taking notes in the background for now. Someone should let me know when we enter Day 2.

Observing for now.

Honestly I think Hectic is scummy because this is the second time he's brought this up and now it feels like he's covering for lack of content

In post 511, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:towny for him.

In post 673, Garmr wrote:I liked the sarcasm in insomnia's 659. Because I agree with the point and it entertains me.

In post 551, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 549, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:Since when is there more then 1 Mafia Team?

is this a fake town slip?

In post 685, insomnia wrote:

In post 673, Garmr wrote:I liked the sarcasm in insomnia's 659. Because I agree with the point and it entertains me.

What point?

In post 683, insomnia wrote:Gobble you said you wanted to repeat TvA

In post 684, insomnia wrote:Actually you might be right but I get more credit if I’m the one leading lynches

Conflict of interests?

In post 689, Garmr wrote:

In post 685, insomnia wrote:

In post 673, Garmr wrote:I liked the sarcasm in insomnia's 659. Because I agree with the point and it entertains me.

What point?

Guess I assumed you were actually better than you are but the fact her readlist was worthless and some of the people she town read/scum read haven't even posted yet.

In post 610, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 608, kagesong wrote:

In post 544, Nero Cain wrote:*shrugz*

I'm saying that if you are sitting there and calling an early reads list "LAMIST" you are giving yourself the freedom to use it as an excuse to vote anytime you want and there's some possible scum motivation there.

I don't see it as a good enough reason to vote by any means.

What's not a good enough reason to vote?

Are you normally this hesitant with

YOUR

vote?

In post 615, Hectic wrote:

In post 551, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 549, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:Since when is there more then 1 Mafia Team?

is this a fake town slip?

How would this be a town slip? Mafia can technically be unaware of there being a second team.

Observing for now.