Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2020 12:07 pm
Dropping the vote with no reason would be associative. Scum chemist might have a less important role and prefer to be lynched over a partner. That points to svs too.
In post 671, HoldenGolden wrote:Bob, you answered it right there. Chemist hasn't said much yet is voting alo hence why a SvS makes some sense.
In post 674, bob3141 wrote:where is my post
In post 675, davesaz wrote:Dropping the vote with no reason would be associative. Scum chemist might have a less important role and prefer to be lynched over a partner. That points to svs too.
In post 677, HoldenGolden wrote:In post 674, bob3141 wrote:where is my postSpoiler: I've erased the time during which you made your lost
Wait is tictac RVS vote still chemist's vote? I'm pretty sure Chemist made a remark about voting Alo
Wouldn't Misty/Aloratom bus and push each other more strongly at this point, given they're the only two wagons? I think them both being scum is very unlikely actually.In post 671, HoldenGolden wrote:Bob, you answered it right there. Chemist hasn't said much yet is voting alo hence why a SvS makes some sense.
And this too when asked what he got by looking over Alo iso.In post 583, Chemist1422 wrote:Not really
I couldn't tell what sort of stuff was playstyle and his answer to my question about his style was too vague to work with
The slot (tictac and chemist) are the same alignment. It doesn't change when it gets replaced.In post 678, bob3141 wrote:Again you out right shade chemist by sayign he voted alort. When he never did.
In post 668, davesaz wrote:Aloratom voted you and was evasive on why.
Being evasive on why you voted someone, especially during RVS, is suspicious.
You seemed to be trying to ignore that this was happening.
When I asked you about it, you said "he votes people for no reason as scum" but conveniently ignored the fact he had voted you for no reason.
Only after I asked a followup, you realized that it had been a logical inconsistency. So you now tried to brush off the initial vote as RVS -- but if you realized that was the case then why try to explain it away differently in the previous question.
Neither of you are giving what I would call straightforward answers, when asked what you're thinking.
You're attacking me, when the logic of what I'm pushing is very straightforward. It's perfectly fine if you don't agree with it, even better if you can give a cohesive answer on why it's wrong, not so much that you try to dismiss it as being nothing.
Because unvoting and then flipping scum creates an association.In post 681, HoldenGolden wrote:That actually raises the question why chemist is still voting Alo if they cannot identify anything.
Chemist feels like they have given up lowkey.In post 680, Hectic wrote:Wouldn't Misty/Aloratom bus and push each other more strongly at this point, given they're the only two wagons? I think them both being scum is very unlikely actually.In post 671, HoldenGolden wrote:Bob, you answered it right there. Chemist hasn't said much yet is voting alo hence why a SvS makes some sense.
Question is does he even know. Does he look like a player that has even caught up.In post 681, HoldenGolden wrote:And this too when asked what he got by looking over Alo iso.In post 583, Chemist1422 wrote:Not really
I couldn't tell what sort of stuff was playstyle and his answer to my question about his style was too vague to work with
That actually raises the question why chemist is still voting Alo if they cannot identify anything.
In post 686, davesaz wrote:Flailing when you aren't even being voted is pretty funny, ngl.
Not practically no.In post 687, bob3141 wrote:Question is does he even know. Does he look like a player that has even caught up.In post 681, HoldenGolden wrote:And this too when asked what he got by looking over Alo iso.In post 583, Chemist1422 wrote:Not really
I couldn't tell what sort of stuff was playstyle and his answer to my question about his style was too vague to work with
That actually raises the question why chemist is still voting Alo if they cannot identify anything.
If he is scum then alort is town. And scum is hard bussing him.
What happened to him last game were he repped into a scum slot. in game he mentioned 2119
And there he put more effort in.
Did you not see my posts where i asked chem if he agrees with alort lynch today. In it i pointed out his slot has vote on alort from rvs
The question what is the scum nature of the wagon. its lurker wagon. Whether he is town or scum, its lurker a wagon.In post 688, Morning Tweet wrote:Bob do you think scum is on the Chem wagon if chem is town?
is it possible you could elaborate on why you like profii!town?In post 693, bob3141 wrote: So far sircake is sure town read of mine. My strongest infact. I think profii is town.
Huh?In post 645, davesaz wrote:I called Aloratom traitor voting for scum Bob. Remember this if I get mislynched.
In post 666, Aloratom wrote:Is this why you are voting me, Dave? You think I'm traitor?In post 664, bob3141 wrote:In post 658, davesaz wrote:I have thought this for a long time and nothing has happened to remove the thought.In post 278, davesaz wrote:I'm torn between treating this as a scummy thing from Alo, or thinking it points to Alo traitor signaling to (Bob IIRC?). I have no special reasons to suspect a traitor, but there are certain interactions that just ping and this is one of those categories.
And what are those thoughts?
See at no point have you actual said any reasons as to why you think im scum.
Explain how you have came to such a conclusion.
You say your thinking hasnt changed. Yet in reality you have not justified any of it.
Dave explain why one should take this as you simply trying to shade me
In post 690, HoldenGolden wrote:Bob can I ask a question?
If you feel pretty good about chemist being scum why are you voting dave in the last 36~ hours? I'm not knocking you for reading him, but you agree with the chemist lynch correct?
Actually, we've had a game where you were scum and I was town. I was playing on an alt and you murdered me in cold blood on night 1. Flavor Leaf was in the game and mislynched Ankamius. I'm sure that rings a bell :vIn post 641, bob3141 wrote:VOTE: Dave
Time for more serous vote than mine on hectic.
Hectic if your not scum, so far every game together has been town town
Are you wondering why I'm asking Bob why he thought my RVS vote was an actual read?In post 648, Morning Tweet wrote:I don't really get what Alo is asking in 636/516.