Page 28 of 159

Posted: Wed May 06, 2020 2:55 am
by Elements
In post 674, Elements wrote:
In post 672, humaneatingmonkey wrote:did you vote cycle men as a reaction test?
no, but it acted as one because you changed your vote
scrap that
no it was not a reaction test

Posted: Wed May 06, 2020 2:56 am
by Elements
In post 673, humaneatingmonkey wrote:I'm 100% sure Elements is scum
what do you think about votata?

Posted: Wed May 06, 2020 2:59 am
by humaneatingmonkey
So where did it bring you?

Posted: Wed May 06, 2020 3:01 am
by humaneatingmonkey
Votata was my scumread going in the day then after I reconciled that his POV could make sense, I dropped it. I have not if he is scum or he is town, and I don't think he's my day 1 lynch.

Posted: Wed May 06, 2020 3:03 am
by humaneatingmonkey
What's your read on me right now?

Posted: Wed May 06, 2020 3:04 am
by Elements
Mislead town

Posted: Wed May 06, 2020 3:04 am
by Elements
but it's a lean not a strong read

Posted: Wed May 06, 2020 3:05 am
by humaneatingmonkey
You said it was a reaction test, and then not a reaction test, so my understanding is your vote makes you think you got an alignment indicative read on me.

What is it?

Posted: Wed May 06, 2020 3:05 am
by humaneatingmonkey
Also, who do you think is misleading me?

Posted: Wed May 06, 2020 3:14 am
by Elements
In post 683, humaneatingmonkey wrote:Also, who do you think is misleading me?
Maybe blinded is a better way of putting it. I think you're misleading yourself

Posted: Wed May 06, 2020 3:17 am
by Elements
In post 682, humaneatingmonkey wrote:You said it was a reaction test, and then not a reaction test, so my understanding is your vote makes you think you got an alignment indicative read on me.

What is it?
I don't think you 100% think I'm scum. Did my change of vote increase how scummy you think I am?

Posted: Wed May 06, 2020 3:18 am
by Cycle Men
In post 656, humaneatingmonkey wrote:Remember that we have daytalk and he can have ghostwriters.
flashbacks to scumteaming with rc

Posted: Wed May 06, 2020 3:20 am
by Cycle Men
In post 644, Isis wrote:Everyone else is town. Except Norwee who I am going to torture. And some people who are hard to figure out.

I don't think Clemency ever plays mafia in a readable way so it makes plenty of sense to advance to playing the 11p it kind of already will be.
bit harsh to whoever this clemency guy is

Posted: Wed May 06, 2020 3:22 am
by Cycle Men
In post 615, Alisae wrote:I’m voting cycle men because i wanna rethink through who I’m voting and if all 3 of those are town then cyclemen are probably less likely to be town and they’re clemency so I don’t particularly care if they live or die tbh
okay ow
im still a person here

Posted: Wed May 06, 2020 4:12 am
by Albert B. Rampage
I'm good with my vote.

Posted: Wed May 06, 2020 4:21 am
by Looker
In post 617, NorwegianboyEE wrote:^This one.
Such interesting roles.
In post 618, Alisae wrote:@Looker
I’m actually fairly open with my reads I’m not really hiding anything atm
I stopped engaging ABR because whenever I asked him why he would give me this answer that told me nothing and the first time I asked him to give me specific posts and he didn’t
Now that I think about this more, this makes me a bit more concerned but i don’t know, i might look back that one time I randed scum with him in Gay Mafia and see if I see any similarities.
It was a strategy question - Do you think publicly forecasting your PoE is a good idea? I feel it's giving scum WIFOM to use against you.
In post 648, Alisae wrote:i must have been seriously stoned when i saw that post then
You're not bussing Norway are you?
In post 675, Elements wrote:
In post 674, Elements wrote:
In post 672, humaneatingmonkey wrote:did you vote cycle men as a reaction test?
no, but it acted as one because you changed your vote
scrap that
no it was not a reaction test
What are your takes on Alisae and Albert B. Rampage?
In post 687, Cycle Men wrote:bit harsh to whoever this clemency guy is
Are you purposely not doing anything so that you don't leave any associations to your partners after you're lynched?

  • @Isis: What snark? Can you show me where?
  • @humaneatingamonkey: Which questions have you posed that I've refused to answer?
    • Also, can you point me to the post you interpreted as abrasive?
  • I think some of these people are just trying to get town brownie points by doing nothing.
p-edit: See what I mean

Posted: Wed May 06, 2020 4:21 am
by Looker
Actually, that was in poor taste

Posted: Wed May 06, 2020 4:30 am
by humaneatingmonkey
I got a tone of abrasiveness in this one and this one. I don't recall you missing any of my questions. I think your reactions cater more to posts and not situations, and that strikes me as... inorganic.

You've played with NorwEE last time. What is your opinion on him?

Posted: Wed May 06, 2020 4:32 am
by humaneatingmonkey
In post 685, Elements wrote:I don't think you 100% think I'm scum. Did my change of vote increase how scummy you think I am?
Yes, especially since your vote reason was his entrance which was super non-AI. If Cycle Men is town here, you're definitely just wanting to hop on that wagon. But since you don't understand the town reasons to join the wagon, you just make up your own.

Posted: Wed May 06, 2020 5:14 am
by votato
hasnt elements now on two occasions answered a question one way and then immediately backtracked?

Posted: Wed May 06, 2020 5:40 am
by Elements
In post 694, votato wrote:hasnt elements now on two occasions answered a question one way and then immediately backtracked?
when was the other time?

Posted: Wed May 06, 2020 5:43 am
by votato
Spoiler:
In post 674, Elements wrote:
In post 672, humaneatingmonkey wrote:did you vote cycle men as a reaction test?
no, but it acted as one because you changed your vote
In post 675, Elements wrote:
In post 674, Elements wrote:
In post 672, humaneatingmonkey wrote:did you vote cycle men as a reaction test?
no, but it acted as one because you changed your vote
scrap that
no it was not a reaction test
In post 583, Elements wrote:where's this ide that I thought it was a joke coming from?
g
In post 579, Elements wrote:I thought it was a reasonable plan, still don't rlly see what's wrong with it tbh
In post 577, Elements wrote:
In post 565, humaneatingmonkey wrote:am i wrong?
yes
In post 564, Elements wrote:
In post 560, humaneatingmonkey wrote:I believe Elements was confused as I was that Isis was serious in her proposition.
What gives you that impression?


these are in reverse order. the joke/not joke thing, and then the reaction test/not reaction test.

Posted: Wed May 06, 2020 5:48 am
by Elements
In post 560, humaneatingmonkey wrote:I believe Elements was confused as I was that Isis was serious in her proposition.
ooooooooooooooooooooooooh
I read this wrong, my bad. I read it as "Elements was confused with the idea" rather than "Elements thought it was serious".
This is fun. I should learn to read.

Posted: Wed May 06, 2020 6:58 am
by northsidegal
-

Posted: Wed May 06, 2020 6:58 am
by northsidegal
-