Posted: Sun May 17, 2020 12:53 am
This is very vague, and not at all made up sounding at all. I'm convinced that you care about this read and aren't just making shit up.In post 670, brassherald wrote:As to Gibus, I feel he's shown some good thoughts and his posting has actually improved since the end of RVS. You know? Like a town.
Huh? All of her posts seem like they're coming from an experienced player? I don't understand what you meant by this?In post 116, Freddiethelady wrote:I’m suspicious that Lilith is a little more experienced then she’s letting on.
Okay see several people asked the same question I just did but he totally avoided answering it even when it was repeated at him, versus the rest of the questions. ¿Por que?In post 124, Freddiethelady wrote:You aren’t posting much, casting votes and defending someone. Not trying to sort out the rules, clarify things or understand people better. It seems a little sus to me, and I could be wrong but it feels lurking to me....That’s why I asked you to explain your vote and your defending.In post 121, lilith2013 wrote:I mean, we’ve both posted so I don’t really think you can say either of us were lurking. And regardless, this early I don’t think it’s AI. The only reason I didn’t include formerfish in this is because he hasn’t actually posted.In post 119, Freddiethelady wrote:And @lilith you are posting only a little more then @iamironcat. It might not be AI but it seems interesting to me you jumped to protect ironcat so quickly.
Can you answer my question about me being “more experienced than I’m letting on”? Why is that something you are suspicious of?
Literally in the same post you dismissed something as a thing you did because RVS, and then cast suspicion on Lilith for something she did during RVS? This smells so scummyIn post 195, Formerfish wrote:You're the only person I know here and this is my rvs thing.
Decently obfuscated vote on me. Probably scum.In post 19, lilith2013 wrote:VOTE: formerfish mafia addicts should be quicklynched so they become less addicted
This is how I feel about you, FormerfishIn post 204, Formerfish wrote:I like you. You could still be scum and ill cry a single tear when you die, but i like you.In post 168, votato wrote:Paranoia, poor logic, a scum list that's too long, no reasoning. You can scumread me for that if you want
The way you keep collectively assigning quality to SEs for the sole reason that they're SEs ain't no good look either buddyIn post 208, Formerfish wrote:Pushing to lynch any of the SEs is not a good look on you.
Those so WIFOM that it's NAI.In post 236, CopyKat wrote:16+48+49 <-- I think he's genuine about having wanted to play scum
I have the opposite read to my predecessor and their naiveté. I think votato has gone out of his way to post without stirring up anything. Clarifications and helping is great, but it makes for the vast majority of his content because it's hard to make up genuine thought processes of read progression as scum.In post 237, feathers wrote:I think Votato is a townsperson as well since pretty early on. They've (what pronoun do you use btw, votato?) been very active, giving pro-town advice (personally they really helped me know how rvs/voting should be done and to form my thought processes), not afraid to make clear stances, and I don't really feel like they're pushing any kind of agenda - they've mostly been helping clarify stances/thought processes or resolve disagreements.
Brass you're going to have to explain to me how that would be a viable scum strategy instead of a bad anti-town move? Because I feel like the only options are bad move all aroundIn post 261, brassherald wrote:Its real easy for scum to hide behind bad play if you let scummy plays go as just bad playIn post 260, CopyKat wrote:agree 100% but doesn't scum post "votato and copycat are masons" in their scum PT and not here?In post 259, brassherald wrote:Outing PRs is never a good idea as town, and is a scum move.
I think there is a difference between scum play and poor play.
In post 265, gibus wrote:If it doesn't make them more accurate, the mafia would waste night kills
This level of self-consciousness only comes from scum I swearIn post 302, CopyKat wrote:So now I'm in a catch-22
gibus clarified 264+265 for me and Its not the scum slip I thought it was but if I unvote I'll probably be scumread for it
So am I scum in this or is scum trying to keep me around? I genuinely confusedbrassherald wrote:There are two people who the scum do not want lynched. Otherwise, the only reason they want a slot to keep around is if they think they've got them pocketed.
You clearly do not have anyone pocketed.
I've never in several games seen Brass break like this before but here it is entirely warranted and I applaud you good sirIn post 314, brassherald wrote:THE POINT IS COUNTING TO TWO! Can you do that?
I'm not making a wall post so that's what you getIn post 676, Formerfish wrote:This is very vague, and not at all made up sounding at all. I'm convinced that you care about this read and aren't just making shit up.In post 670, brassherald wrote:As to Gibus, I feel he's shown some good thoughts and his posting has actually improved since the end of RVS. You know? Like a town.
this is completely out of touch with reality and the fact that his two scumreads scumread each other means nothing. Her post was pretty okay and yours is a sad accusation based on a fabricated premiseIn post 679, votato wrote:that puts copykat on L-2. Nauci how do you reconcile your top 2 scum reads scum reading each other? Are we just bussing hard? Pretty meh catchup, speaking of iioa
can we getIn post 680, brassherald wrote:I'm not making a wall post so that's what you getIn post 676, Formerfish wrote:This is very vague, and not at all made up sounding at all. I'm convinced that you care about this read and aren't just making shit up.In post 670, brassherald wrote:As to Gibus, I feel he's shown some good thoughts and his posting has actually improved since the end of RVS. You know? Like a town.
I said before that people were trusting feathers way too easily. That catch up post where Nauci claims on day 1 to name the Scum team doesn't seem right. As votato said its a lot of IIOA and she's trying to pocket me by pointing out me being upset was justified. Which I already knew, but whatever.In post 684, lilith2013 wrote:Explain please?
Also can you answer this questionIn post 600, lilith2013 wrote:In post 549, lilith2013 wrote:Can you explain why you think this?In post 540, brassherald wrote:Ironcat and Lilli is my best guess at a TvT argument if there is one.
I already did. You guys displayed reasoning that I think town uses. I think you were both wrong but the process was there.In post 686, lilith2013 wrote:Also can you answer this questionIn post 600, lilith2013 wrote:In post 549, lilith2013 wrote:Can you explain why you think this?In post 540, brassherald wrote:Ironcat and Lilli is my best guess at a TvT argument if there is one.
Have we played together before?In post 677, Nauci wrote:Oh boy oh gee a Formerfish game! I swear that wasn't sarcastic I am legit twice as excited now
Since when are you sring feathers slot?In post 683, brassherald wrote:I'm sorry that Nauci replaced into a Scum slot.
VOTE: Nauci
We're still buds outside of the game
In post 540, brassherald wrote:I feel like people might have been a little too fast to trust Feathers. Still not sure about you.In post 539, Formerfish wrote:Ok, you care to comment on anything else, or are you good with that being your contribution given everything else that has been going on?In post 538, brassherald wrote:I'm cool with where my vote is. I feel like there's lots of noise from Kat but not much else. Feeling good about it.
Ironcat and Lilli is my best guess at a TvT argument if there is one.
Votato I'm comfortable saying he's either town or got me pocketed hard.
I don't know about Freddie at all legitimately forgot he was in the game
Can you read?In post 690, Formerfish wrote:Since when are you sring feathers slot?In post 683, brassherald wrote:I'm sorry that Nauci replaced into a Scum slot.
VOTE: Nauci
We're still buds outside of the game
Did you screw up the chart you made to help you keep all your "reads" in order?
First you forget how you're reading Gib, and now feathers slot. I think you need an assistant as scum to play well. CAN WE GET THIS SCUMMER SOME ASSISTANCE?
I can read. The above sentence says that you feel people might have been quick to trust feathers.In post 540, brassherald wrote:I feel like people might have been a little too fast to trust Feathers.
I'm having a hard time reconciling your current read on feathers with what youve said about them so far.In post 685, brassherald wrote:heavy suspicions
Did that start as of page 14?In post 679, votato wrote:that puts copykat on L-2. Nauci how do you reconcile your top 2 scum reads scum reading each other? Are we just bussing hard? Pretty meh catchup, speaking of iioa
Actually I was just saying you were justified as an indirect dig at the post you were talking about because I had run out of direct ways to express itIn post 685, brassherald wrote:she's trying to pocket me by pointing out me being upset was justified.
I don't think so; the reaction was by reputationIn post 689, Formerfish wrote:Have we played together before?In post 677, Nauci wrote:Oh boy oh gee a Formerfish game! I swear that wasn't sarcastic I am legit twice as excited now
ლ(ಠ益ಠ)ლ WHAT DID Y'ALL DO THAT BROKE BRASS , GAME ლ(ಠ益ಠ)ლIn post 693, brassherald wrote:Just to be clear, I'm not asking if you are able to read but like if I say something that's been clearly stated can you all please just read what I've already written rather than wasting my time with inane questions