Mafiascum.net

In post 674, Nosferatu wrote:so our kill for the day is gonna be bc "well he's not doing much anyway"

nice

I've seen this before

You're going to be next

if that's my fate

In post 674, Nosferatu wrote:so our kill for the day is gonna be bc "well he's not doing much anyway"

nice

I mean you have been giving no reads or input on anyone else except the one person that you've been tunneling all day with no support. I offered you the opportunity to say what other reads you've had and thus far you've refused to give any.

If you think a competing wagon is better, you are free to speak up, say so, and explain why.

I understand that lurking/inactivity is not a scumtell by itself, which is why my read of the BM slot hasn't really been affected by day 2 actions. It's more that Dunn's contributions have not been substantive or helpful, and at times have been harmful

I am working to consider the points in Dunn's favor as well as points against. What I see is one or two points against and none for

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Dunn

In post 678, ready2rock wrote:Dunn's contributions have not been substantive or helpful, and at times have been harmful

when?

should I have quickhammered the cop claim without a cc?

In post 674, Nosferatu wrote:so our kill for the day is gonna be bc "well he's not doing much anyway"

One of common tells that someone is member of mafia is their lack of motivation to scumhunt. People, which are spoiled have to pretend that they are trying to figure out the enemy and genuine engagement is slightly more exhausting for them.

Looking forward to seeing you apply that to the members of my wagon going forward Kerset

meh

dunn's not my first choice but i'll hammer i guess if there's no other movement, in a few hours

i'd still rather launch r2r or Nos

@everyone who's voting Dunny: Why'd you disagree with my reasons for him being town? 585

We shouldn't no launch because there's a chance there's a 1-shot vig or something like that to even (odd) out the numbers.

VOTE: redrock

Would be fine with him or Blair over Dunny. Dunny, you willing to go here?

In post 681, Kerset wrote:

In post 674, Nosferatu wrote:so our kill for the day is gonna be bc "well he's not doing much anyway"

One of common tells that someone is member of mafia is their lack of motivation to scumhunt. People, which are spoiled have to pretend that they are trying to figure out the enemy and genuine engagement is slightly more exhausting for them.

this wagon is policy entirely policy don't even try to say otherwise

i find town having a vig unlikely tbh
don't games this size have 2 scum

In post 678, ready2rock wrote:

In post 674, Nosferatu wrote:so our kill for the day is gonna be bc "well he's not doing much anyway"

nice

I mean you have been giving no reads or input on anyone else except the one person that you've been tunneling all day with no support. I offered you the opportunity to say what other reads you've had and thus far you've refused to give any.

If you think a competing wagon is better, you are free to speak up, say so, and explain why.

I understand that lurking/inactivity is not a scumtell by itself, which is why my read of the BM slot hasn't really been affected by day 2 actions. It's more that Dunn's contributions have not been substantive or helpful, and at times have been harmful

I am working to consider the points in Dunn's favor as well as points against. What I see is one or two points against and none for

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Dunn

there's like one scum left why would i need more reads?
i'll re-evaluate if i'm wrong

I will come back and hammer in one hour unless someone changes votes to r2r.

lmao hammering at L-2 haven't seen that one

In post 686, Nosferatu wrote:

In post 681, Kerset wrote:

In post 674, Nosferatu wrote:so our kill for the day is gonna be bc "well he's not doing much anyway"

One of common tells that someone is member of mafia is their lack of motivation to scumhunt. People, which are spoiled have to pretend that they are trying to figure out the enemy and genuine engagement is slightly more exhausting for them.

this wagon is policy entirely policy don't even try to say otherwise

otherwise

In post 690, Nosferatu wrote:lmao hammering at L-2 haven't seen that one

Dunnstral (4): Blair, Kerset, midwaybear, ready2rock

With 8 alive, it takes 5 votes to launch.

In post 684, Mafia Goon wrote:@everyone who's voting Dunny: Why'd you disagree with my reasons for him being town? 585

@Kerset

You have been @ed. There's no greater offence than ignoring an @.

i am still reading this progression

In post 585, Mafia Goon wrote:If Ydrasse is scum with Dunny, she either stays on him for the bussing towncred, or tries to push something else and save her scum buddy. In what world does she abandon the wagon and push someone who isn't getting launched? None of the worlds is what I'm implying if that wasn't clear.

If Ydrasse is scum and Dunny is town then she still got no reason to push unlaunchable person. She can just stay there and get townie launched instead of her or push someone, who can be launched to save herself. The only world in which this makes sense is where she wish to gain towncred & save dunn for some reason. To be honest it feels rather like poor play rather then something AI.

Sorry I was taking a bath

Hammer in 5

lmao well someone voted r2r

i think someone from the dunn wagon had to switch under the terms and conditions tho tuff