Posted: Sat Aug 15, 2020 4:50 pm
I've seen this beforeIn post 674, Nosferatu wrote:so our kill for the day is gonna be bc "well he's not doing much anyway"
nice
I mean you have been giving no reads or input on anyone else except the one person that you've been tunneling all day with no support. I offered you the opportunity to say what other reads you've had and thus far you've refused to give any.In post 674, Nosferatu wrote:so our kill for the day is gonna be bc "well he's not doing much anyway"
nice
when?In post 678, ready2rock wrote:Dunn's contributions have not been substantive or helpful, and at times have been harmful
One of common tells that someone is member of mafia is their lack of motivation to scumhunt. People, which are spoiled have to pretend that they are trying to figure out the enemy and genuine engagement is slightly more exhausting for them.In post 674, Nosferatu wrote:so our kill for the day is gonna be bc "well he's not doing much anyway"
this wagon is policy entirely policy don't even try to say otherwiseIn post 681, Kerset wrote:One of common tells that someone is member of mafia is their lack of motivation to scumhunt. People, which are spoiled have to pretend that they are trying to figure out the enemy and genuine engagement is slightly more exhausting for them.In post 674, Nosferatu wrote:so our kill for the day is gonna be bc "well he's not doing much anyway"
there's like one scum left why would i need more reads?In post 678, ready2rock wrote:I mean you have been giving no reads or input on anyone else except the one person that you've been tunneling all day with no support. I offered you the opportunity to say what other reads you've had and thus far you've refused to give any.In post 674, Nosferatu wrote:so our kill for the day is gonna be bc "well he's not doing much anyway"
nice
If you think a competing wagon is better, you are free to speak up, say so, and explain why.
I understand that lurking/inactivity is not a scumtell by itself, which is why my read of the BM slot hasn't really been affected by day 2 actions. It's more that Dunn's contributions have not been substantive or helpful, and at times have been harmful
I am working to consider the points in Dunn's favor as well as points against. What I see is one or two points against and none for
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Dunn
otherwiseIn post 686, Nosferatu wrote:this wagon is policy entirely policy don't even try to say otherwiseIn post 681, Kerset wrote:One of common tells that someone is member of mafia is their lack of motivation to scumhunt. People, which are spoiled have to pretend that they are trying to figure out the enemy and genuine engagement is slightly more exhausting for them.In post 674, Nosferatu wrote:so our kill for the day is gonna be bc "well he's not doing much anyway"
Dunnstral (4): Blair, Kerset, midwaybear, ready2rockIn post 690, Nosferatu wrote:lmao hammering at L-2 haven't seen that one
@KersetIn post 684, Mafia Goon wrote:@everyone who's voting Dunny: Why'd you disagree with my reasons for him being town? 585
If Ydrasse is scum and Dunny is town then she still got no reason to push unlaunchable person. She can just stay there and get townie launched instead of her or push someone, who can be launched to save herself. The only world in which this makes sense is where she wish to gain towncred & save dunn for some reason. To be honest it feels rather like poor play rather then something AI.In post 585, Mafia Goon wrote:If Ydrasse is scum with Dunny, she either stays on him for the bussing towncred, or tries to push something else and save her scum buddy. In what world does she abandon the wagon and push someone who isn't getting launched? None of the worlds is what I'm implying if that wasn't clear.