Posted: Mon Sep 28, 2020 2:10 pm
Daddy, Ive been skimming all day but am still so behind! Play with me while I do some more ketchup.
In Alonzo's ISO, but this jumped out. In what way is this game remotely stagnating? Dont get me wrong, Im a fan of lurker lynches and down with the proposal, but dont understand this pitch for it.In post 618, Battle Mage wrote:to stop the game stagnating.
I dont really like this post and line of thought at someone who hasnt been here, I dont think? Like obviously she hasnt thought about her vote/whether or not it is still RVS/the wagon comp, ya? So why is the tone of this seemingly attacking rather than "so what do you make of that"?In post 569, bob3141 wrote:Taylor-directed post
I see your explanation for this, and I agree on principle with the 4th vote logic. I just dont buy the part that has it depending on Noraa's alignment. Maybe its just personal history with the early lol-wagon, but I find the later lol-wagon votes to be townie, regardless of the target's alignment. Scum dont want that kind of attention.In post 648, bob3141 wrote:And since i'm leaning toward Noraa being town on balance I think golden is likely town if i'm right on nora.
This struck me as not that problematic of a progression/I think you took the third quote out of context?In post 571, iamausername wrote:also, the progression from
This is a town approach and response.
I guess I just am going to agree to disagree with you on disprovable stances. Like to me its a way to appear solvey/steer in a direction without necessarily antagonize the player precisely because you can back off. Its not so much the quick wagon as the odd entry vote and disappearance, then coming back later to express a scumread on a slot that has had some light FoSSing but do so in a way that does not also antagonize the player. That said, I kinda liked what Alonzo did after I made this post, and I didnt like what Taylor did not do, so.In post 419, Menalque wrote:I actually kind of liked Alonzo’s whole progression there. Like, if you’re scum who’s bandwagoning onto me then you pick a reason that will stand up to some scrutiny. There weren’t enough votes for it to be part of an attempt to quickwagon me.In post 323, teacher wrote:I found Alonzo and Taylor's entries to be the pingiest. Alonzo with a naked vote and then absence, only to call TvT and foist a weak/obviously disprovable vote on Menalque (a slot that had been FoSed by enough to be a potential wagon).
What’s the incentive for scum!alonzo to vote me for a reason he knows won’t hold up only to then back down off it immediately? If I knew him already, I’d say that’s probably a p good way of trying to pocket me, but I don’t. So provided he isn’t scum with like, datisi who told him that’s exactly the sort of thing I’d like, I find his initial answer very likely to be true (skimming, saw something that seemed incongruent, voted based on that, corrected when more information provided) and think it’s actually a p towny thought process
Im not used to you being this setup focused??In post 469, Menalque wrote:Esp as it was a v believable claim based on the public setup information which implies that there are neighbourhoods/masonries/neighbouriser in the game
I feel like this is odd for you (its actually the single thing giving me the most pause about you -- I saw it in my skim and was "bawhaaa?") Want to actually speak on it? (we probs are going to be ships passing this game due to the school blocking during the day, but I should have a somewhat lighter day tomorrow).In post 529, Menalque wrote:Teacher - null
this is contradictoryIn post 528, TheGoldenParadox wrote:didn't vote for bm because i was more suspicious of noraa, there was already a noraa wagon (which allows actual pressure to be created), and nora was the hypocrite there and looked scummier to me. rn i think noraa is just newbie town, but being confident in bm!scum within the first day doesn't really scream town; noraa will stay at a light townread.
???????????In post 531, Noraa wrote:Idk if she's scum here but I'm somewhat certain she isn't here.
golden with this opportunistic wagon hoppingIn post 532, TheGoldenParadox wrote:uhh yeah this post scumpings hard wth
this is basically textbook manipulation VOTE: shelly
idc, I feel like being liberal with TRs isn’t a scum tellIn post 562, Battle Mage wrote:cringey buddying yuck yuck yuck
I dont consider what i did as rolefishing but i now see how it could be considered as rolefishing (asking someone to confirm the claim)In post 578, Battle Mage wrote:ShellyC - Why pretend you didn't rolefish when you did? Worried about getting bad attention?
will you take the position?In post 580, Battle Mage wrote:you need a lawyer.