Mafiascum.net

In post 673, clidd wrote:C'mon, can we just stop tripping over our own feets? we are regressing in the game.

Hey that's what a mafia would say if they wanted to draw attention off of them.

Also, maybe I'm just pretending I think you're maf because I'm 'testing for reactions' of how other ppl respond to it lololo

Also you're the one who claimed doctor in the first place out of nowhere and now you don't want anybody to talk about it? Could have just not claimed y'know?

I was not worried about that.

The fact that you everyone is paying so much attention to such a futile thing only illustrates how strong bias on Scum!clidd is affecting players.

Actually, forgot the *you*. I mean 'everyone.

It's not 'bias', people had a maf read on you before you claimed, that is supposedly why you claimed apparently.

In post 675, Trendall wrote:

In post 673, clidd wrote:C'mon, can we just stop tripping over our own feets? we are regressing in the game.

Hey that's what a mafia would say if they wanted to draw attention off of them.

Also, maybe I'm just pretending I think you're maf because I'm 'testing for reactions' of how other ppl respond to it lololo

LOL, that's a 200 IQ move.

In post 673, clidd wrote:C'mon, can we just stop tripping over our own feets? we are regressing in the game.

This sounds like a nice attempt to divert attention, duly noted.

Trendall wrote: Also, maybe I'm just pretending I think you're maf because I'm 'testing for reactions' of how other ppl respond to it lololo

That one got me.]

Trendall wrote:It's not 'bias', people had a maf read on you before you claimed, that is supposedly why you claimed apparently.

He claimed because people had "big cases" against him...

In post 676, Trendall wrote:Also you're the one who claimed doctor in the first place out of nowhere and now you don't want anybody to talk about it? Could have just not claimed y'know?

Hum, that's not how it works. I'm alived because I claimed, and who knows what would happen at E-1.

In post 680, clidd wrote:LOL, that's a 200 IQ move.

It's not what I'm doing though, I think you're maf I'm just like, satirising your 'I got the setup wrong because I was testing for reactions' thing

In post 497, clidd wrote:

In post 495, Trendall wrote:I can't work out the town motivation for claiming so early?

Maybe being top 2 SR?

In post 498, clidd wrote:Maybe a big case against me?

Just for reference.

In post 682, clidd wrote:who knows what would happen at E-1.

I can tell you, You would have claimed doctor and it would have been a more believable claim.

So you think I got the setup wrong?

Hmmmmm.

In post 685, Trendall wrote:

In post 682, clidd wrote:who knows what would happen at E-1.

I can tell you, You would have claimed doctor and it would have been a more believable claim.

Yeah, also this is the reason why people are still talking about your claim btw.

In post 686, clidd wrote:So you think I got the setup wrong?

No 'setup' is just lazy wording on my part, I meant that you said that doctor can self-protect when it can't.

Why would my claim be more credible on E-1? the only difference was that I called out earlier and that, in fact, saved Ben time to rationalize his PoE (and probably others too).

The only point is that we are now wasting time on a futile discussion.

I'm actually helping you, guys.

Because you're more likely to actually be the final elimination at that point, whereas at the point you claimed, it's like there are still days left, there are votes on different people, the final elimination could conceivably ended up being anybody so there was no need for you to claim.

In post 691, clidd wrote:I'm actually helping you, guys.

Like this to me is just obvious maf stuff.

This is simply not correct. I spoke to the mod and he said that there would be no extension of the deadline, so it is very likely that near the end there would be some sudden change to my slot, forcing me to claim, but denying talk time between me and you(plural).

By calling out earlier, I avoid this scenario and provide my opinions (of a PR, clear, by the way).

In post 694, clidd wrote:This is simply not correct. I spoke to the mod and he said that there would be no extension of the deadline, so it is very likely that near the end there would be some sudden change to my slot, forcing me to claim, but denying talk time between me and you(plural).

I mean we still have four days left so it's just not plausible that you were this scared of being eliminated that far away from the deadline.

In post 695, clidd wrote:By calling out earlier, I avoid this scenario and provide my opinions (of a PR, clear, by the way).

You are absolutely nowhere near clear.

In post 655, Trendall wrote:

In post 653, Chumbo wrote:Why would you work under this assumption? What would change in your eyes if clidd isn't mafia?

Because clidd is by far the most disingenuous person in the game right now. If he's not mafia then that would mean mafia is somewhere within the remaining seven players from my perspective.

And can you explain this ^

You called me the most disingenuous person in the game for no reason.

In post 696, Trendall wrote:

In post 694, clidd wrote:This is simply not correct. I spoke to the mod and he said that there would be no extension of the deadline, so it is very likely that near the end there would be some sudden change to my slot, forcing me to claim, but denying talk time between me and you(plural).

I mean

right now

we still have four days left so it's just not plausible that you were this scared of being eliminated that far away from the deadline.

Ok, so you can read minds.