Mafiascum.net

Any input on my track is fine. It's not as if they can do anything but sweat.

In post 675, Ythan wrote:Any input on my track is fine. It's not as if they can do anything but sweat.

I'm happy to go with you, give tracker full lead on who gets eliminated.

I'd be ok with either Clasko or Alstro, but I'd say track which ever of the two don't get yeeted tonight and we'll go from there

pog ok was waiting on my confirmation message.

let me provide some input

honestly, looking at this game before wanting to replace, i thought clasko was scum for everyone being really a townread and clasko was just poe atp so i was like let me replace in , turn this wagon off me and pog as solo scum

turns out i was wrong, im just a boring vt here.

all the tracker talk in the beginning made it so obvious that there was a tracker in the setup -- then i was right, hockey claimed tracker.

2nd: i stopped reading around page 18-19 i believe?

the last thing i remember was hockey being replaced.

also i dont personally think its alstro -- i did scumread them while reading their early day 1 but honestly them playing AtE here is probably just bored vt knwoing town will be able to win day 3.

i think maf lies between margot / egnix who were both sheeps throughtout day 1 -2

lets see how offended they will get. i would say there is mafia between alstra / egnix just because alstro voted egnix day 1 and had that interaction but im townreading alstra so i would just assume its egnix // and thats just not fair / bias.

In post 676, MargotRosa wrote:

In post 675, Ythan wrote:Any input on my track is fine. It's not as if they can do anything but sweat.

I'm happy to go with you, give tracker full lead on who gets eliminated.

I'd be ok with either Clasko or Alstro, but I'd say track which ever of the two don't get yeeted tonight and we'll go from there

see like quotes like these -- makes it seem like you are setting up chainlims right.

because you would want the tracker not to go on you etc.

also isnt hockey tracker what happened to that claim kek

I really don't think that Margot is scum, given that Quick was.

I don’t think Margot is likely to be scum in this case unless they had some sort of play where LQ pushes their partner for all of Day 1. I also noted that LQ just kind of dropped off with their initial scum read on Margot, going from often commenting about their posts then to nothing, then coming right back to voting Margot again.

Knowing LQ flipped red, it reads like he wanted to get everyone off them and coming back to his scumread on Margot as he had for most of Day 1 so it doesn’t look initially like an opportunistic vote. It probably is an opportunity vote, considering that he could easily make a wagon on Margot, with one person already on them and then Egix joining them on the wagon.

In post 679, GrandpaMo wrote:also isnt hockey tracker what happened to that claim kek

Ythan is hockey (also hi!!!)

I feel like scum!Mo would have looked at the game more closely and known that which makes me think it's more likely to be in {Egix, T3}

Also have made it clear yesterday that I don't think it's Margot

Also, hello GrandpaMo.

Hi Gramps thanks for subbing in.

I'll find some time to look at LQ's iso and point out all the posts I think he doesn't make if he's partners with anyone else.

In post 679, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 676, MargotRosa wrote:

In post 675, Ythan wrote:Any input on my track is fine. It's not as if they can do anything but sweat.

I'm happy to go with you, give tracker full lead on who gets eliminated.

I'd be ok with either Clasko or Alstro, but I'd say track which ever of the two don't get yeeted tonight and we'll go from there

see like quotes like these -- makes it seem like you are setting up chainlims right.

because you would want the tracker not to go on you etc.

also isnt hockey tracker what happened to that claim kek

I heavily doubt Margot is the second scum. Between the two of them, LQ would've been the PR so I don't see why they 1v1 each other here. Scum desperately needed its Rolecop, so it makes no sense to bus him.

Also hello again, Grandpa.

In post 684, alstroemerial wrote:I feel like scum!Mo would have looked at the game more closely and known that which makes me think it's more likely to be in {Egix, T3}

Also have made it clear yesterday that I don't think it's Margot

In post 681, StrangeMatter wrote:I don’t think Margot is likely to be scum in this case unless they had some sort of play where LQ pushes their partner for all of Day 1. I also noted that LQ just kind of dropped off with their initial scum read on Margot, going from often commenting about their posts then to nothing, then coming right back to voting Margot again.

In post 680, Egix96 wrote:I really don't think that Margot is scum, given that Quick was.

In post 688, Roden wrote:

In post 679, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 676, MargotRosa wrote:

In post 675, Ythan wrote:Any input on my track is fine. It's not as if they can do anything but sweat.

I'm happy to go with you, give tracker full lead on who gets eliminated.

I'd be ok with either Clasko or Alstro, but I'd say track which ever of the two don't get yeeted tonight and we'll go from there

see like quotes like these -- makes it seem like you are setting up chainlims right.

because you would want the tracker not to go on you etc.

also isnt hockey tracker what happened to that claim kek

I heavily doubt Margot is the second scum. Between the two of them, LQ would've been the PR so I don't see why they 1v1 each other here. Scum desperately needed its Rolecop, so it makes no sense to bus him.

holy fuck ok ok .

margot isn't scum xD

ig margot is just being utr'd

In post 683, alstroemerial wrote:

In post 679, GrandpaMo wrote:also isnt hockey tracker what happened to that claim kek

Ythan is hockey (also hi!!!)

In post 685, StrangeMatter wrote:Also, hello GrandpaMo.

In post 686, Ythan wrote:Hi Gramps thanks for subbing in.

In post 689, Roden wrote:Also hello again, Grandpa.

nice to play wit yall again.

strangematter, im still mad at how i pushed all of day 1 that one game and then u had to replace:(

turns out i was right that u were scum

I like your new signature

I don’t play scum very well or even be interested in playing a scum game. A game of don’t get caught by everyone else is kind of boring, except hunting for PRs, that’s really the only fun part. Fun to me is not knowing in this game.

Going back to the game, @Alstromerical considering it looks like you thought that Clasko has done things that seemed town, but in #667 you go into this like they could be scum. Has your read really changed? If not, who would you pick as your top slot to eliminate?

Sorry, *if so,

I had it right the first time, ignore #695, that was a mistake.

It started as an openness to sheep the tracker. I found the possibility of “mafia wasn’t around to make the kill” and “Clasko wasn’t around” to be a compelling pair of facts as well, which was new info compared to Day 1. As my vote reflects, though, T3 is still my top slot to eliminate. If T3 or Roden would openly post their shared understanding of what T3 was pulling, that could potentially clear everything up. Based on my conclusions from the play, though, it seems like it could be boldfaced PR hunting. That could also match up if we have a doc in the setup and Ythan was targeted, which would be a realistic scenario if it isn’t Clasko-slot.

In post 693, StrangeMatter wrote:I don’t play scum very well or even be interested in playing a scum game. A game of don’t get caught by everyone else is kind of boring, except hunting for PRs, that’s really the only fun part. Fun to me is not knowing in this game.

u replace all the time as scum...?

Just thinking from another game that this could be just as likely Alstro is scum jumping on something scummy. It’s a bit concerning though since it did happen last game where Ythan (scum) specifically said I was PR hunting when I was Town.