Mafiascum.net

In post 674, rousseau wrote:but why correct me from the +town one to the not +town one when my post was directed to someone else simply containing my understanding of cephrir's post

I'm nosy.

In post 586, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:I wonder if this threw Galron off because Galron is partnered with Infinity, and he didnt understand why he was being called a town partner with her, rather than a scum partner

VOTE: Galron

a) dislike this reasoning, i also thought gamma had written 'town partners'
b) don't want galron to be on e2

In post 673, skitter30 wrote:- rousseau i feel like you're inordinately focused on the callers, like more focused on them than the players of the 'main' game. why are is so much of your focus on them?

feels important to me/captures my attention

In post 673, skitter30 wrote:rousseau i feel like you're inordinately focused on the callers, like more focused on them than the players of the 'main' game. why are is so much of your focus on them?

Scum often find relief in engaging with lower-stress, non-game related content.

In post 675, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 674, rousseau wrote:but why correct me from the +town one to the not +town one when my post was directed to someone else simply containing my understanding of cephrir's post

I'm nosy.

nono i am asking why would cephrir correct me

In post 613, Galron wrote:I'm getting ready to leave the office, so giving some reads in case I get hammered on the way home. Scum!Gamma doesn't post 584 & 585, especially 585 I think. I also think scum!Gamma doesn't top post unless his scum game has changed since last time I scummed with him maybe 8-10 months ago.

In post 619, Galron wrote:Sticking by Infinity town read. Skitter probably town. Rousseau probably town. DGB probably town. Roden null scum. Pooky looks like town game, but dunno bc it's pooky. Kyouko very unsure about. Ydrasse dunno. Tetrina town lean. Cephrir scum lean. House dunno. I think Blade Dancer is Titus. If not, I dunno.

town imo ^

In post 626, rousseau wrote:but even there like there was a moment

where skitter was doing the thing where she helps me communicate

which i really appreciate and is one of the reasons i enjoy playing with her so much but i know she does it as both alignments so i can't say i feel sure of that

your welcome!
but i also don't know what you're talking abt in the bolded >.>

In post 676, skitter30 wrote:b) don't want galron to be on e2

e-4 currently

In post 644, Infinity 324 wrote:VOTE: ceph

galron's takes are pretty ok, skitt isn't really going anywhere but i agreed with galron? i think? when he said that ceph's posts towards tetrina felt a bit forced, to me if felt like he was trying to twist her newbie-indicative posts into something scummy. could be a playstyle thing

icky vote :/

In post 681, skitter30 wrote:but i also don't know what you're talking abt in the bolded >.>

first you were clarifying something infinity said that i was riffing on and then you asked me to rephrase something due to not following

In post 677, rousseau wrote:

In post 673, skitter30 wrote:- rousseau i feel like you're inordinately focused on the callers, like more focused on them than the players of the 'main' game. why are is so much of your focus on them?

feels important to me/captures my attention

ok why more than like all the other things that are happening in this game. kinda feels to me like sorting the 'main' game is more important than sorting the callers; i feel like they're mostly a distraction

In post 678, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 673, skitter30 wrote:rousseau i feel like you're inordinately focused on the callers, like more focused on them than the players of the 'main' game. why are is so much of your focus on them?

Scum often find relief in engaging with lower-stress, non-game related content.

yes that's where i'm ultimately going with this

will amend 677 to if you would like

but it kinda feels like that's what both of you were looking for anyway

In post 673, skitter30 wrote:just like a few assorted thoughts:
- rousseau i feel like you're inordinately focused on the callers, like more focused on them than the players of the 'main' game. why are is so much of your focus on them?
- infinity feels somewhat hollow. and a lot of her conversation seems pedantic/shallow/nitpicky. not sure what the right words are exactly
- dont' really get the ceph scumreads (from dgb, gamma, galron)
- @ssbm why are you townreading me?

In post 456, Infinity 324 wrote:i felt like her townread on skitt was good and especially that she expected me to put weight into it. that's a towny bias

i thought you didn't like the townread last night?

- i'm not really sure i get the galron wagon? like i'm not sure they're a shining beacon of towniness but i also don't really scumread them

The way you insisted when pushing me reminded me of myself when I get tunneled as town. I could feel the determination in your posts, and I recognized that when I answered your questions, you would feel begrudgingly satisfied with the answer, but then you would find something else and push me on that (because you're tunneled town). Eventually you seemed satisfied with everything, but I get the feeling you're not going to TR me fully at all this game, or if you do, it will be volatile because you'll be hanging on to a nagging suspicion about me.

If you're not sure of the Galron wagon and don't like the cephrir one, are you SRing anyone besides Infinity atm?

In post 635, Roden wrote:

In post 628, rousseau wrote:

In post 627, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 626, rousseau wrote:scum probably house and maybe roden

Spicy!

if anything i think the opposite of spicy, i just function on likelihood and worlds that make sense to me and right now that's them

I was about to say that definitely isn't a spicy take lol. House and I both have low content, so I could see either of us being the default elim choice if we end the day with a solid enough town core. House is usually a lot more active so idk what's going on with them, but in my case a bunch of games I signed up for suddenly all started at once so I got spread thin.

You might be low content but you’re still kinda present rn

In post 687, rousseau wrote:will amend 677 to

~reasons

if you would like

but it kinda feels like that's what both of you were looking for anyway

well ok
ig yeah ultimately where i was going is what dgb said - i imagine ti's a lot easier for scum to 'solve' the callers than to solve the 'real' game, so people who focus on the callers and not the game is soemwhat scummy to me
and i guess for you especially because as of liek this morning you had little 'main game' solving (although it looks like you have more in the pages i just read)
so like i guess it makes me a little nervous taht you're scum finding an easy, but largely meaningless, way of interacting with the game

In post 689, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 635, Roden wrote:

In post 628, rousseau wrote:

In post 627, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 626, rousseau wrote:scum probably house and maybe roden

Spicy!

if anything i think the opposite of spicy, i just function on likelihood and worlds that make sense to me and right now that's them

I was about to say that definitely isn't a spicy take lol. House and I both have low content, so I could see either of us being the default elim choice if we end the day with a solid enough town core. House is usually a lot more active so idk what's going on with them, but in my case a bunch of games I signed up for suddenly all started at once so I got spread thin.

You might be low content but you’re still kinda present rn

One game is currently in night phase and the other two died off a bit, plus it's one of my days off so I can be a little more present today.

In post 673, skitter30 wrote:- rousseau i feel like you're inordinately focused on the callers, like more focused on them than the players of the 'main' game. why are is so much of your focus on them?

she’s like, clearly not? How much have you read

In post 690, skitter30 wrote:i imagine ti's a lot easier for scum to 'solve' the callers than to solve the 'real' game, so people who focus on the callers and not the game is soemwhat scummy to me
and i guess for you especially because as of liek this morning you had little 'main game' solving (although it looks like you have more in the pages i just read)
so like i guess it makes me a little nervous taht you're scum finding an easy, but largely meaningless, way of interacting with the game

i find it more likely the scum are avoiding doing so due to knowing who the mafia caller is but anyway

In post 676, skitter30 wrote:

In post 586, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:I wonder if this threw Galron off because Galron is partnered with Infinity, and he didnt understand why he was being called a town partner with her, rather than a scum partner

VOTE: Galron

a) dislike this reasoning, i also thought gamma had written 'town partners'
b) don't want galron to be on e2

I wrote what I wrote
Whether I meant to write it is the question

In post 690, skitter30 wrote:

In post 687, rousseau wrote:will amend 677 to

~reasons

if you would like

but it kinda feels like that's what both of you were looking for anyway

well ok
ig yeah ultimately where i was going is what dgb said - i imagine ti's a lot easier for scum to 'solve' the callers than to solve the 'real' game, so people who focus on the callers and not the game is soemwhat scummy to me
and i guess for you especially because as of liek this morning you had little 'main game' solving (although it looks like you have more in the pages i just read)
so like i guess it makes me a little nervous taht you're scum finding an easy, but largely meaningless, way of interacting with the game

I kinda get where Rouuseau is coming from, I was expecting more out of the radio calls too, but it just looks like flavor to me so far. If they end up mattering at all, it might not be until the next Day phase.

In post 688, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:The way you insisted when pushing me reminded me of myself when I get tunneled as town. I could feel the determination in your posts, and I recognized that when I answered your questions, you would feel begrudgingly satisfied with the answer, but then you would find something else and push me on that (because you're tunneled town). Eventually you seemed satisfied with everything, but I get the feeling you're not going to TR me fully at all this game, or if you do, it will be volatile because you'll be hanging on to a nagging suspicion about me.

If you're not sure of the Galron wagon and don't like the cephrir one, are you SRing anyone besides Infinity atm?

ok yeah this is fair
(uh sorry for the tunnel if you're town >.>)
i am feeling somewhat better abt you know than i did last night tbh

~

this is where i'm at:

In post 0, Morning Tweet wrote:1. Ydrasse - town
2. Galron - town?
3. DrippingGoofball - scum? not a strong read tho, i can see it being town too i suppose
4. Tetrina -town
5. skitter30 - shining beacon of towniness
6. Gamma Emerald - town? but very weak/shaky read
7. ssbm_Kyouko - nulltown maybe? not sure
8. Roden - null, no thoughts
9. Infinity 324 - scummyish
10. Cephrir - town?
11. House - scummy? dislike the tetrina vote
12. rousseau - i'm not sure rn. i dont' feel as townie on her as i know a lot of people are
13. PookyTheMagicalBear - hard null and i find that somewhat worrying

In post 692, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 673, skitter30 wrote:- rousseau i feel like you're inordinately focused on the callers, like more focused on them than the players of the 'main' game. why are is so much of your focus on them?

she’s like, clearly not? How much have you read

yes she is? or at least her content yesterday (irl) was mostly about that

In post 673, skitter30 wrote:i thought you didn't like the townread last night?

i didn't agree with the townread, but i thought it was town-indicative

In post 693, rousseau wrote:i find it more likely the scum are avoiding doing so due to knowing who the mafia caller is but anyway

oh good point, i forgot abt that