Mafiascum.net

In post 667, Tammy wrote:post 666 cookie is confirmed scum.

In post 664, Tammy wrote:I don't really understand why you want me to townread wisdom so bad. The game is super early, proper town reads matter, and I tend to be cautious in that regard anyway.

In post 671, the worst wrote:reality check me pls. does scum!mafmen bother going thru like 3 pages of nonsensical fighting with town!wisdom?

In post 670, cool cookie wrote:can you please clarify third question?

In post 657, Enchant wrote:I am thinking about two candidates which i plan to trust soon. Before that, i wish ask everyone. Who you would suggest for town deserved trust? Don't tell "No one" or something like that, just one or two names with explaination why they are considered townie for you. After that i reveal planned candidates (i think that's blatant choice from my perspective so you can as well quess) and maybe think about my life choices.

In post 673, Tammy wrote:

In post 639, Prism wrote:Also, sorry Infinity-I did not notice you shifted your pronoun to they. I will do my best to revise it moving forward.

And I did not notice that you shifted it to she; sorry for referring to you as they.

In post 679, Tammy wrote:

In post 670, cool cookie wrote:can you please clarify third question?

You said that Tammy-Pooky was a lock and I was wondering what you meant, but you just responded to Prism that you thought we were a locked pair so I figured you answered that already.

In post 681, cool cookie wrote:

In post 673, Tammy wrote:

In post 639, Prism wrote:Also, sorry Infinity-I did not notice you shifted your pronoun to they. I will do my best to revise it moving forward.

And I did not notice that you shifted it to she; sorry for referring to you as they.

you can always play it safe and just refer to people by their usernames. cookie works fine for me, or cool if you're trying to butter me up.

In post 650, Tammy wrote:

In post 580, Klick wrote:

In post 472, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:expending political capital to shade someone who's town is not exactly a winning strategy for a scumside player.

your goal is to get someone to trust you

not make sure nobody can trust anyone (cuz that's like literally impossible)

Scum doesn't just want to get trusted - they want to be trusted more than town
So scum!Tammy would be concerned about town'Wisdom getting soft-confirmed because that takes away from her potential pairings, since all the townies that might have wanted to pair with her would instead be appealing to Wisdom

I don't feel like this is stupid?

But it seems that everyone has a consensus about this and I've not played the setup before admittedly

I did like the bolded though.

In post 683, Enchant wrote:

In post 681, cool cookie wrote:

In post 673, Tammy wrote:

In post 639, Prism wrote:Also, sorry Infinity-I did not notice you shifted your pronoun to they. I will do my best to revise it moving forward.

And I did not notice that you shifted it to she; sorry for referring to you as they.

you can always play it safe and just refer to people by their usernames. cookie works fine for me, or cool if you're trying to butter me up.

Hey food, answer my question please?

In post 687, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:I don't feel very confident read-wise rn

the weaker players r barely participating and I don't feel comfortable townbinning the stronger players atm since they are perfectly capable of maintaining this kind of thread presence/activity as scum.

In post 678, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:

In post 671, the worst wrote:reality check me pls. does scum!mafmen bother going thru like 3 pages of nonsensical fighting with town!wisdom?

if he is actually a horcrux of me, yes.

I've spent 40+ pages fighting with townies on the dumbest shit imaginable before.

In post 689, cool cookie wrote:

In post 687, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:I don't feel very confident read-wise rn

the weaker players r barely participating and I don't feel comfortable townbinning the stronger players atm since they are perfectly capable of maintaining this kind of thread presence/activity as scum.

who are the weaker players?

In post 686, cool cookie wrote:

In post 650, Tammy wrote:

In post 580, Klick wrote:

In post 472, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:expending political capital to shade someone who's town is not exactly a winning strategy for a scumside player.

your goal is to get someone to trust you

not make sure nobody can trust anyone (cuz that's like literally impossible)

Scum doesn't just want to get trusted - they want to be trusted more than town
So scum!Tammy would be concerned about town'Wisdom getting soft-confirmed because that takes away from her potential pairings, since all the townies that might have wanted to pair with her would instead be appealing to Wisdom

I don't feel like this is stupid?

But it seems that everyone has a consensus about this and I've not played the setup before admittedly

I did like the bolded though.

on reflection i feel the opposite way about the bolded

In post 691, the worst wrote:

In post 689, cool cookie wrote:

In post 687, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:I don't feel very confident read-wise rn

the weaker players r barely participating and I don't feel comfortable townbinning the stronger players atm since they are perfectly capable of maintaining this kind of thread presence/activity as scum.

who are the weaker players?

me

In post 693, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:when I say weak i don't mean like overall weak

just weaker in the sense that I feel their scum games are not as strong as their town games and there is readable disparity

I don't actually know if this applies to cookie

In post 690, the worst wrote:I'm a bit dubious about what the scum motivation for hard wking Klick is there.

In post 696, Infinity 324 wrote:

In post 693, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:when I say weak i don't mean like overall weak

just weaker in the sense that I feel their scum games are not as strong as their town games and there is readable disparity

I don't actually know if this applies to cookie

catch me as scum and you can put me in this category

In post 695, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:

In post 691, the worst wrote:

In post 689, cool cookie wrote:

In post 687, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:I don't feel very confident read-wise rn

the weaker players r barely participating and I don't feel comfortable townbinning the stronger players atm since they are perfectly capable of maintaining this kind of thread presence/activity as scum.

who are the weaker players?

me

you r probly the strongest scum player in this pool