Mafiascum.net

crazy how that works eh?

In post 669, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 656, Pan Smierc wrote:

In post 648, Gamma Emerald wrote:And I think based on GrandpaMo also bitching about my aimless questioning in the game I referenced, GMo and LQ are actually comparable players for me

u are intentioanlly ignoring my next post where i say its NAI for gpamo lmfao

Don’t buy it
I found scum!GMo in that game in part because he kept badgering me to engage with his questions @ me.

Yeah, that sounds more like a personal problem. I like people engaging with my content. Most the time people don't. I feel like you are using a tell the works for you, but sadly, you are dealing with someone cut from a different cloth here. Don't go based on your general tells with me. It won't work. I'm too special.

In post 671, Pan Smierc wrote:

In post 669, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 656, Pan Smierc wrote:

In post 648, Gamma Emerald wrote:And I think based on GrandpaMo also bitching about my aimless questioning in the game I referenced, GMo and LQ are actually comparable players for me

u are intentioanlly ignoring my next post where i say its NAI for gpamo lmfao

Don’t buy it
I found scum!GMo in that game in part because he kept badgering me to engage with his questions @ me.

then you got lucky idk what to say lmao, its not a good metric to find scum.

I said in part
The issue really arose when he started overlooking my answers and trying to push me in spite of that

In post 673, Pan Smierc wrote:because quick understands its NAI for me

I mean, kinda, yeah. But like, that's why I propose chopping you if StD flips Town.

Of course, that means you have to vote Gamma here, which isn't a good look honestly.

In post 677, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 671, Pan Smierc wrote:

In post 669, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 656, Pan Smierc wrote:

In post 648, Gamma Emerald wrote:And I think based on GrandpaMo also bitching about my aimless questioning in the game I referenced, GMo and LQ are actually comparable players for me

u are intentioanlly ignoring my next post where i say its NAI for gpamo lmfao

Don’t buy it
I found scum!GMo in that game in part because he kept badgering me to engage with his questions @ me.

then you got lucky idk what to say lmao, its not a good metric to find scum.

I said in part
The issue really arose when he started overlooking my answers and trying to push me in spite of that

and there u have it- the actual reason u caught them lmfao

congrats just dismantled ur argument for Quick scum

now where we going?

I'm like 90% confidence on quick town btw - so yeah

In post 679, Pan Smierc wrote:

In post 677, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 671, Pan Smierc wrote:

In post 669, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 656, Pan Smierc wrote:

In post 648, Gamma Emerald wrote:And I think based on GrandpaMo also bitching about my aimless questioning in the game I referenced, GMo and LQ are actually comparable players for me

u are intentioanlly ignoring my next post where i say its NAI for gpamo lmfao

Don’t buy it
I found scum!GMo in that game in part because he kept badgering me to engage with his questions @ me.

then you got lucky idk what to say lmao, its not a good metric to find scum.

I said in part
The issue really arose when he started overlooking my answers and trying to push me in spite of that

and there u have it- the actual reason u caught them lmfao

congrats just dismantled ur argument for Quick scum

now where we going?

I'm like 90% confidence on quick town btw - so yeah

Why do you think quick is town?

I still the Quick’s read on Pan+StD is scummy tho
I’d also vote StD if I had to tho because I feel like his level of give-a-damn seems a bit scummy

In post 678, LicketyQuickety wrote:

In post 673, Pan Smierc wrote:because quick understands its NAI for me

I mean, kinda, yeah. But like, that's why I propose chopping you if StD flips Town.

Of course, that means you have to vote Gamma here, which isn't a good look honestly.

i had already compromised on that slot based on a previous meta read on the previous slot owner - i get you disagree on my read there but gamma really isnt pushing u in good faith here and i mainly unvoted because i wanted to give gamma a sense of security if scum.

in and StD + Gamma world, there is 100% viability that they try to force the elim onto you here because its easy because you play very sloppy and have easy to scumread play.

I really didnt like that gamma is projecting tells from players that aren't you because it is the type of thing that is difficult to argue is wrong because to the observer it looks nice and true - and I dismantled his argument for you.

Gamma also is a player who cracks hard under pressure so I really like voting him

In post 682, Gamma Emerald wrote:I’d also vote StD if I had to tho because I feel like his level of give-a-damn seems a bit scummy

this is a bad take

In post 681, MegAzumarill wrote:

In post 679, Pan Smierc wrote:

In post 677, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 671, Pan Smierc wrote:

In post 669, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 656, Pan Smierc wrote:

In post 648, Gamma Emerald wrote:And I think based on GrandpaMo also bitching about my aimless questioning in the game I referenced, GMo and LQ are actually comparable players for me

u are intentioanlly ignoring my next post where i say its NAI for gpamo lmfao

Don’t buy it
I found scum!GMo in that game in part because he kept badgering me to engage with his questions @ me.

then you got lucky idk what to say lmao, its not a good metric to find scum.

I said in part
The issue really arose when he started overlooking my answers and trying to push me in spite of that

and there u have it- the actual reason u caught them lmfao

congrats just dismantled ur argument for Quick scum

now where we going?

I'm like 90% confidence on quick town btw - so yeah

Why do you think quick is town?

because he is taking such hard initiative to generate content and solve the game on a solo level and interpreting things in a genuine way that quick does -> what's his agenda if he's scum? sure its nice and easy to be like "oh they're trying to chain lims" but nah - you seriously cannot argue that until StD flips. its stupid. StD can argue that but StD is arguing im scum - so hey.

yes i sure didn't argue that LQ was scum

StD everytime someone claims they are likely scum

In post 686, Save The Dragons wrote:yes i sure didn't argue that LQ was scum

but on what basis I might ask oh boy

VOTE: Pan

Let's see what happens.

i gave my case and you said nothing meaningful against it you just went into your bank of bullshit and spat out more self-aggrandizing bullshit that you always do

In post 690, Save The Dragons wrote:i gave my case and you said nothing meaningful against it you just went into your bank of bullshit and spat out more self-aggrandizing bullshit that you always do

In post 687, Pan Smierc wrote:
StD everytime someone claims they are likely scum

In post 689, LicketyQuickety wrote:VOTE: Pan

Let's see what happens.

and here we were doing so well quick

i hope to understand where you are tryign to go with this though because i see a potential Thing you are doing

In post 692, Pan Smierc wrote:

In post 689, LicketyQuickety wrote:VOTE: Pan

Let's see what happens.

and here we were doing so well quick

Have a little faith in the process.

just so easy to discredit other people

hard to actually make good arguments

In post 694, LicketyQuickety wrote:

In post 692, Pan Smierc wrote:

In post 689, LicketyQuickety wrote:VOTE: Pan

Let's see what happens.

and here we were doing so well quick

Have a little faith in the process.

nah i gotchu lmao

Pan, why is Cookie Scum?

VOTE: StD
I actually like that LQ had the guts to vote Pan

In post 698, Gamma Emerald wrote:VOTE: StD
I actually like that LQ had the guts to vote Pan

Explain?