Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2022 12:35 am
UNVOTE:
I believe her. It explains the indifference.
She does remind me of Triplicate.
I believe her. It explains the indifference.
She does remind me of Triplicate.
Now you're just sombody dat i used to know!!In post 662, House wrote:You.
ADHD is a possibility. I'm no doctor. You're just reminding me of someone I used to know.
I don't know what to do about "bad vibes" :/In post 667, Galron wrote:And taly I'm picking up bad vibes from you. I can't pinpoint it, but they're there.
I agree with this until the final statement. I want toIn post 665, Titus wrote:There's a huge cogdis here.In post 652, Dwlee99 wrote:Damnit, I wasn't done that post. Okay, where I left off:
Scorpius can absolutely AtE as scum. We backed off him in wildlife (mini normal) but he was scum. I haven't seen Scorpius as town unless this one, but do not use the ate as a clearing method. I want to review that game to compare the style of ate, because Scorpius couldn't have known I'd replace in and be able to analyze this, but that'll be not a phone post.
I'm like fine with Meg wagon but I'm really not sure how people read them cause they always are scummy.
Saw vote count as well so
UNVOTE:
I am going to start here.
VOTE: Scorpius
Pending comparing the AtE
Dwlee: Meg's always scummy, so I don't want to vote there and don't get how to read her.
Also Dwlee: I've never seen Scorpious as town, but he's a fine vote.
I don't see scum making this kind of fallacious thinking as they'd watch themselves.
I'm not talking about the wagon.In post 678, Taly wrote:Anyone up to flashwagonDwlee?
House, it was mainly the votes I didn't like with Triplicate that made their town flip make sense to me. I didn't have an issue with this wagon.
VOTE: HouseIn post 675, House wrote:UNVOTE:
I believe her. It explains the indifference.
She does remind me of Triplicate.
In post 607, Enchant wrote:Well yes, i don't want vote MagIn post 606, Titus wrote:Enchant's post read as wanting to do anything but vote Meg. Not sure if ghis is a denial play or a scum ine.
This is pretty much the opposite reaction you should be having to unvotes on a wagon you claim not to support.In post 682, Enchant wrote:VOTE: HouseIn post 675, House wrote:UNVOTE:
I believe her. It explains the indifference.
She does remind me of Triplicate.
Just no.
Fuck me beliving you pushed this wagon for VT claim and then immediatly unvoted "Well i believe this i quess it's town let's wagon someone else".In post 683, House wrote:In post 607, Enchant wrote:Well yes, i don't want vote MagIn post 606, Titus wrote:Enchant's post read as wanting to do anything but vote Meg. Not sure if ghis is a denial play or a scum ine.This is pretty much the opposite reaction you should be having to unvotes on a wagon you claim not to support.In post 682, Enchant wrote:VOTE: HouseIn post 675, House wrote:UNVOTE:
I believe her. It explains the indifference.
She does remind me of Triplicate.
Just no.
VOTE: Enchant
Considering this game is pretty much role madness, I don't think you mean a single word of that post.In post 685, Enchant wrote:Fuck me beliving you pushed this wagon for VT claim and then immediatly unvoted "Well i believe this i quess it's town let's wagon someone else".In post 683, House wrote:In post 607, Enchant wrote:Well yes, i don't want vote MagIn post 606, Titus wrote:Enchant's post read as wanting to do anything but vote Meg. Not sure if ghis is a denial play or a scum ine.This is pretty much the opposite reaction you should be having to unvotes on a wagon you claim not to support.In post 682, Enchant wrote:VOTE: HouseIn post 675, House wrote:UNVOTE:
I believe her. It explains the indifference.
She does remind me of Triplicate.
Just no.
VOTE: Enchant
What your motivation for even voting, just force claim?
Yeah, it's a pretty weak thing, but something seems off.In post 679, Taly wrote:I don't know what to do about "bad vibes" :/In post 667, Galron wrote:And taly I'm picking up bad vibes from you. I can't pinpoint it, but they're there.
Okay, and how this is case here?In post 689, MegAzumarill wrote:large number of prs to compensate for the large chance of many scum prs
I can't even see where thats mentioned...In post 693, Enchant wrote:Okay, and how this is case here?In post 689, MegAzumarill wrote:large number of prs to compensate for the large chance of many scum prs
Only thing garanted is 2 VTs.
Then I don't entirely understand what you're asking here. I've made my position on why I scumreadIn post 681, House wrote:I'm not talking about the wagon.In post 678, Taly wrote:Anyone up to flashwagonDwlee?
House, it was mainly the votes I didn't like with Triplicate that made their town flip make sense to me. I didn't have an issue with this wagon.
I'm talking about Meg.
In post 687, House wrote:Considering this game is pretty much role madness, I don't think you mean a single word of that post.In post 685, Enchant wrote:Fuck me beliving you pushed this wagon for VT claim and then immediatly unvoted "Well i believe this i quess it's town let's wagon someone else".In post 683, House wrote:In post 607, Enchant wrote:Well yes, i don't want vote MagIn post 606, Titus wrote:Enchant's post read as wanting to do anything but vote Meg. Not sure if ghis is a denial play or a scum ine.This is pretty much the opposite reaction you should be having to unvotes on a wagon you claim not to support.In post 682, Enchant wrote:VOTE: HouseIn post 675, House wrote:UNVOTE:
I believe her. It explains the indifference.
She does remind me of Triplicate.
Just no.
VOTE: Enchant
What your motivation for even voting, just force claim?
Hmmmmm. Why doesn't the VT claim dissuade you?In post 690, Titus wrote:@House, Rejoin. It's likely Enchant is just Meg's partner.
@Taly, Not a fan of a flashwagon. Definitely refusing on people I have reasons to TR.
Yeah something about my perspective and approach to this game can be described asIn post 692, Galron wrote:Yeah, it's a pretty weak thing, but something seems off.In post 679, Taly wrote:I don't know what to do about "bad vibes" :/In post 667, Galron wrote:And taly I'm picking up bad vibes from you. I can't pinpoint it, but they're there.