Page 28 of 97

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2022 3:51 pm
by Thestatusquo
In post 673, Grib wrote:I'm pretty fucking great. I played DBD for seven hours because priorities.

TSQ, I don't think what you're doing is especially helpful. You're just beating a dead horse, and if you're correct, BBT is just going to wifom everything he says.
You could vote BBT out and then I will stop doing it. :)

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2022 3:52 pm
by BlueBloodedToffee
Aw man, I'm playing it right now! 1.5m bloodpoints to spend, then going to bed!

I like your read on HPE. We should do something with that

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2022 3:52 pm
by BlueBloodedToffee
I should have, I kind of want my vote on TSQ though for ego reasons incase I get elimmed, you know?

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2022 3:55 pm
by Thestatusquo
Its fine we'll end up doing the stupid thing that always happens where everyone waffles around for 6 days and then panics and lims a lurker.

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2022 3:56 pm
by BlueBloodedToffee
In post 678, Thestatusquo wrote:Its fine we'll end up doing the stupid thing that always happens where everyone waffles around for 6 days and then panics and lims a lurker.
I agree with this.

Bad strategy and way too often days are dragged on for longer than they need to be.

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2022 3:57 pm
by Thestatusquo
and then we'll have no information and be back in the same position tomorrow and everyone will be like waaaaaah why did we lim that lurker.

Or we could actually play this game the way its meant to be played and wagon people to force people to take stances and gain information and get claims and then actually have a productive elimination today.

That's what I'm trying to do. It would be nice if literally anyone was trying to help me instead of just sitting back and not voting and not wagoning anyone.

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2022 3:57 pm
by BlueBloodedToffee
I'll help you but I don't want to wagon myself.

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2022 3:58 pm
by Thestatusquo
Your scum reads are 2 random lurkers.

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2022 3:58 pm
by Thestatusquo
Who you refuse to give me information on why they're scum.

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2022 3:58 pm
by BlueBloodedToffee
Frog is a lurker?

God damn. That's a hot take.

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2022 3:59 pm
by Thestatusquo
I guess its unfair to say frogster is lurker but I don't want to sort him yet.

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2022 3:59 pm
by BlueBloodedToffee
I can explain scum reads, no problem. I just don't explain town reads very often because I see very little point.

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2022 4:00 pm
by Thestatusquo
the two people besides you I'm most interested in wagoning are in your town reads.

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2022 4:00 pm
by BlueBloodedToffee
Who are they?

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2022 4:01 pm
by Thestatusquo
Oh Aisa isn't in your town reads. But Solway is.

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2022 4:02 pm
by BlueBloodedToffee
I can't really get a handle on Aisa.

She feels very waffley, kind of reminds me of when Bella is scum. But her tone doesn't come across as scummy so I just throw my hands in the air and say I'll sort her later

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2022 4:03 pm
by Grib
I have no interest in killing off a lurker Day 1, as much as I'd like to be rid of them.

BBT is probably going to be the consensus, and there's a reasonable chance he's scum. I'm nowhere near as confident as you seem to be.

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2022 4:04 pm
by BlueBloodedToffee
In post 691, Grib wrote:I have no interest in killing off a lurker Day 1, as much as I'd like to be rid of them.

BBT is probably going to be the consensus, and
there's a reasonable chance he's scum
. I'm nowhere near as confident as you seem to be.
Fuck. That was a kick to the ball sack.

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2022 4:07 pm
by Thestatusquo
In post 691, Grib wrote:I have no interest in killing off a lurker Day 1, as much as I'd like to be rid of them.

BBT is probably going to be the consensus, and there's a reasonable chance he's scum. I'm nowhere near as confident as you seem to be.
how do you think you get information in mafia? You do it by voting people and wagoning them? It's best to do that before 2 seconds before the deadline so you can actually use that information. I'm trying not to be rude but this is mafia 101 and you're now like the third person who has said something like this.

We need to wagon people. If you think there's a chance someone might be scum you wagon them day 1, thats how the game is played. You're never going to have certainty. I don't have certainty. The only people who have certainty d1 are informed because their role PM is red.

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2022 4:08 pm
by Grib
Yeah, sorry, but I think this whole "pointlessly argue with the person attacking you" thing is easy for scum to appeal to the masses and look like they're contributing. If you're town, you know people aren't magically going to take your side and send TSQ to the gallows.

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2022 4:10 pm
by Grib
In post 693, Thestatusquo wrote:
In post 691, Grib wrote:I have no interest in killing off a lurker Day 1, as much as I'd like to be rid of them.

BBT is probably going to be the consensus, and there's a reasonable chance he's scum. I'm nowhere near as confident as you seem to be.
how do you think you get information in mafia? You do it by voting people and wagoning them? It's best to do that before 2 seconds before the deadline so you can actually use that information. I'm trying not to be rude but this is mafia 101 and you're now like the third person who has said something like this.

We need to wagon people. If you think there's a chance someone might be scum you wagon them day 1, thats how the game is played. You're never going to have certainty. I don't have certainty. The only people who have certainty d1 are informed because their role PM is red.
Gee, thanks for the lesson in mafia.

You're less wagoning and more tunneling. Wagoning involves other active participants, and no one has gotten above three votes as far as I recall. Which isn't a dig at you, just the whole vibe of this game has been pretty sleepy and stuck in a rut.

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2022 4:10 pm
by BlueBloodedToffee
Again, I agree. I just felt like jumping in thread and having some fun with TSQ. He is very much Mr. Serious and I enjoyed playing on it. Didn't really serve any ither purpose than for my own enjoyment.

My bad.

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2022 4:12 pm
by BlueBloodedToffee
I'll put some proper thoughts in thread tomorrow when it's not 4am and I can think straight.

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2022 4:12 pm
by Thestatusquo
I'm not tunneled at all. I have other people I think are scummy.

I just don't think BBT has done anything to make me town read them and I think my reaction test is certainly better than random for catching scum especially with how badly they failed it.

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2022 4:13 pm
by Thestatusquo
In post 695, Grib wrote:
In post 693, Thestatusquo wrote:
In post 691, Grib wrote:I have no interest in killing off a lurker Day 1, as much as I'd like to be rid of them.

BBT is probably going to be the consensus, and there's a reasonable chance he's scum. I'm nowhere near as confident as you seem to be.
how do you think you get information in mafia? You do it by voting people and wagoning them? It's best to do that before 2 seconds before the deadline so you can actually use that information. I'm trying not to be rude but this is mafia 101 and you're now like the third person who has said something like this.

We need to wagon people. If you think there's a chance someone might be scum you wagon them day 1, thats how the game is played. You're never going to have certainty. I don't have certainty. The only people who have certainty d1 are informed because their role PM is red.
Gee, thanks for the lesson in mafia.

You're less wagoning and more tunneling. Wagoning involves other active participants, and no one has gotten above three votes as far as I recall. Which isn't a dig at you, just the whole vibe of this game has been pretty sleepy and stuck in a rut.
It would be a wagon if people who say things like "there's a reasonable chance they're scum" voted on it instead of voting off on a vanity vote. Can't think of who that might describe.