Posted: Tue May 13, 2014 2:26 pm
and I still kinda think they are town?
I already said it did.In post 6772, magenta_thegreat wrote:Oh, and I and I'm interested in Pigey's action, because if actually did go through, I feel kinda bad for making him waste his one shot assuming town and legit claim.
In post 6774, magenta_thegreat wrote:not really, no though apparently the only way they are scum is if JSU is scum
My role confirms that there are multiple cops so we definitely know that are multiple investigative roles. I am leaning more towards scum having the ability to mess with the roles that we do have. Multiple roleblockers is a possibility. If Katsuki, RG, and Stalin all had their roles fail, I dunno, crazy idea, maybe AP can roleblock three people each night?In post 6128, Tammy wrote:Okay so, I'm trying to make sense of the claims.
What we know for sure:
1) MastinSSK- Tree stump bulletproof
2) Rancid- Gladiator
3) Mac- Role stooping bodyguard
4) LordBusiness- Roleblocker who can come back to life
5) Yggdra Union- JOAT - powers unknown
6) Cupcake- Delayer
---
7) Magenta- Self-governing duel master
8) PeregrineV- Janitoring VIG
9) Titan- Anti-roleblocker
10) CarbonFiber- Miller neighborizer
What's left as claimed:
11) AngryPidgeon- Cop who submits three names for scum to choose from(with a 1X JK?)
12) JSU- Even night tracker with cop aspects
13) Stalin- Amnesiac follower
14) Penguin - Inventor?
15) Nacho - Commuter?
16) Brian/Notty - claimed to be blocked/unclaimed role
17) The Fox and The Hound - Didn't claim
Night two: Brian and bello ffery claim to be blocked.
Now here's part of my problem. Does anyone think there's just a little too many investigative roles claimed? Also Brian says his role failed, which would suggest that it's also investigative of some sort, but one would think he'd be a bit wary of the investigative claims if he was, but I'm not too sure that he's been around during claim fest so I'd have to check. Also we apparently two roles who are unable to die, well apparently mastin couldn't die who knows what limitations are on nacho.
Let's say all the investigative roles are town, then I'd expect scum to have some pretty strong powers. No one has come forward to be a roleblocker, so I refuse to believe there's another town one.
Hmmm I don't think I've come to any conclusions, but something doesn't feel right. I mean I hope that cupcake is scum, I really do, or this town is screwed. Penguin keeps insisting he has to be, but it's not something I feel great about. Maybe if I could trust more people besides bellifery I'd be more confident in this and feel calmer but I don't. And so help me if the one person I trust turns out to be scum I just don't know what I'll do.
What was Nacho like in the neighbourhood last night?In post 6346, CarbonFiber wrote:I came up with something but I'm not sure whether to talk about it yet. We didn't really talk in the neighborhood because I didn't trust Nacho. I asked him who his last partner was besides AP and Penguin. He didn't tell me. I asked after daystart him why he didn't kill you since you'd make it harder for him to blow his cover and get me mislynched. He didn't respond to that either.
This is a little ridiculous though.In post 6348, CarbonFiber wrote:Fox and Magenta are null.
There could easily be even/odd night scum roles that we don't know about so I don't think this matters all that much.In post 6394, AngryPidgeon wrote:And you are the only claimed even/odd role in the game which makes me squint funny.
I think this kind of thing is why you're not getting any townreads. Almost any reason to call someone town could be negated with the line 'but it could just be really good scum'.In post 6404, AngryPidgeon wrote:Dv feels genuinely perplexed in people sumreading them I guess although that could just be good faked scumplay.
I'm feeling iffy about Carbon Fiber myself, but this is uh.. not good. I thought Cupcake was scum. Carbon Fiber obviously wasn't that into it (let's assume town for the sake of this). Although when it comes down to it I don't really care who hammers as I'd feel we were equally responsible for the lynch regardless, for CF it was obviously different as he preferred not to hammer a wagon that he didn't really believe in if there was someone who thought Cupcake was scum (me) around. As I said, I don't relate to this viewpoint, but I think it's understandable, so CF is either town and this makes sense, or is scum with this probably not being very relevant to his alignment. As I've implied before, if anything I think taking this alone would make CF less likely scum.In post 6408, AngryPidgeon wrote:Are you serious right now? Why are we talking about hypotheticals about whether or not you would hammer if Tammy asked nicely enough. You didnt hammer. You told DV to do it so you could be off for moral VCA purposes.
Woah... Tammy, this is EXACTLY EXACTLY EXACTLY something I've been thinking and worried about. I haven't even mentioned it to Ceph yet because I thought it was too out there, but I feel so irrationally happy right now.In post 6425, Titan wrote:And part of my problem is that you're not actually looking at everything. You're discounting some things because you have a *strong read* which is fine but coming up with new ways that AP is scum without for one second considering the possibility that JSU is scum is a whole metric fuckton of confirmation bias. I, for one, don't see how you can be so sure. I have postulated that you are so sure because you guys are partnered because it's really the only reason why you've been going on about AP but not really pushing him and then using the Mastin scum read AP so he's scum scum scum! When Mastin isn't all that great at reading AP; I mean in Anything Goes he was 100% certain AP was scum when he was town telling like crazy. The day two suggestion that it should be AP instead of Mastin after you declared that Pieguy was the only person you trusted to lead the town and Pieguy was tunneling on Mastin. Why did you all of a sudden decide to suggest the day should go away from where the leader was saying to go? In some instances you look like you're trying to tie your partner AP to people in a weird manner.
And yeah this.
Please stop this train of thought right now.In post 6683, Titan wrote:...I think I need to be the lynch today.
I'm going to spend some time in a hole, but I think that's going to be my conclusion.
Are you fucking kidding me? I responded to that post ages ago.In post 6787, The Fox and the Hound wrote:Woah... Tammy, this is EXACTLY EXACTLY EXACTLY something I've been thinking and worried about. I haven't even mentioned it to Ceph yet because I thought it was too out there, but I feel so irrationally happy right now.
This is just wrong. The only person who has been looking at everything is me. It is also such a generic accusation and I am not even sure what it is reference to.In post 6425, Titan wrote:And part of my problem is that you're not actually looking at everything.
I don't get this way of looking at things at all. AP was the one who was coming up with new ways to scumread me and I've pointed this out several times.In post 6425, Titan wrote:You're discounting some things because you have a *strong read* which is fine but coming up with new ways that AP is scum without for one second considering the possibility that JSU is scum is a whole metric fuckton of confirmation bias.
I explained it in my huge wall on BRO-Desp. I explained that their posting has been really town in the neighborhood. I can't see how that was missed. It is one thing to not be convinced but I don't get why you thinkIn post 6425, Titan wrote:I, for one, don't see how you can be so sure.
I think Nacho is scum so I am scum with Nacho. I think AP is scum so I am scum with AP. Either way, I am scum. I am apparently finding new ways that AP is scum but not actually pushing him.In post 6425, Titan wrote:I have postulated that you are so sure because you guys are partnered because it's really the only reason why you've been going on about AP but not really pushing him and then using the Mastin scum read AP so he's scum scum scum!
I explained this already. My "town leader" thing about Pie was referring to Mastin's posts about him being a town leader and me saying that I trust Pie more than Mastin.In post 6425, Titan wrote:When Mastin isn't all that great at reading AP; I mean in Anything Goes he was 100% certain AP was scum when he was town telling like crazy. The day two suggestion that it should be AP instead of Mastin after you declared that Pieguy was the only person you trusted to lead the town and Pieguy was tunneling on Mastin. Why did you all of a sudden decide to suggest the day should go away from where the leader was saying to go? In some instances you look like you're trying to tie your partner AP to people in a weird manner.
He didn't get a 'result'. He must have been blocked or maybe redirected.In post 6785, CarbonFiber wrote:Cupcake gets an incorrect result on AP (how?)
K I'd like to remind everyone that magenta is softing a mass RB role. And FFS I don't see how you are capable of pinning literally all the RBs on me and not wondering for a second if that makes a single iota of sense. I just dont get it. I went back and started skimming D1 around when i replaced in to see if I could nail down exactly how we started down whatever it is we did this game. Im not really at any conclusive point since Im trying to read everything for context, but wow. Reminder:In post 6786, CarbonFiber wrote:maybe AP can roleblock three people each night?
True. I more wanted to see how they'd respond to me raising this point. Im definitely not going down THAT thorny path after mini 1521.In post 6787, The Fox and the Hound wrote:There could easily be even/odd night scum roles that we don't know about so I don't think this matters all that much.
There is plenty of Tammy to go around for the both of you, play nice and share.In post 6788, CarbonFiber wrote:Are you fucking kidding me? I responded to that post ages ago.In post 6787, The Fox and the Hound wrote:Woah... Tammy, this is EXACTLY EXACTLY EXACTLY something I've been thinking and worried about. I haven't even mentioned it to Ceph yet because I thought it was too out there, but I feel so irrationally happy right now.
In post 6330, Yulia Jue wrote:Votecount 3-12 (Final)
With 12 players alive, it will take 7 votes to lynch or no lynch.
Magenta_thegreat (1): PeregrineV
AngryPidgeon (1): magenta_thegreat
CupcakePanda (7): AngryPidgeon, Just Sheep Us, Nachomamma8, Breakfast With Stalin, CupcakePanda, Penguin_Alien, The Fox and the Hound
Nachomamma8 (1): Red Gyarados
Not Voting (2): CarbonFiber, Titan,
Mod Note: None at the moment
Deadline is set at 13 days: (expired on 2014-05-20 18:13:27)
In post 6331, Yulia Jue wrote:CupcakePanda, who was Chelsea Torn, Town Modified Delayer*, was lynched Day Three*A town modified delayer also has a oneshot magnet ability
Night 3 deadline will be 48 hours: (expired on 2014-05-13 05:30:51)
The usual stipulation about all actions and a majority to end early apply.
Back on 239, but that is one scum-filled wagon.In post 6333, Yulia Jue wrote:All actions in, majority of votes, yada yada.
Nobody died night three.
With 11 alive it will take 6 votes to lynch or no lynch.
Deadline is set at 12 days: (expired on 2014-05-25 04:32:54)
Please. please. PLEASE Do not pretend like you didn't move the goalposts on your scumread on me, that is just shameful regardless of your alignment.In post 6789, CarbonFiber wrote:I don't get this way of looking at things at all. AP was the one who was coming up with new ways to scumread me and I've pointed this out several times.
Okay, first off, I just said I was kidding about the triple roleblocking GF. I still suspect a GF though. My scumread on you is mostly based on how you approached your scumread of me + inability to see the big picture in my posting. It is really obvious that I am putting an intense amount of effort into solving the game and I think you are looking at things that a player of your caliber should understand aren't alignment indicative. I wouldn't mind so much if a less skilled player suspected me for stuff like that (like Mac's "In post 6795, AngryPidgeon wrote:Please. please. PLEASE Do not pretend like you didn't move the goalposts on your scumread on me, that is just shameful regardless of your alignment.In post 6789, CarbonFiber wrote:I don't get this way of looking at things at all. AP was the one who was coming up with new ways to scumread me and I've pointed this out several times.
I wont even deny that I have been doing the same. I expressed concern that I MIGHT BE DOING EXACTLY THIS AND AM BIASED not like 2 pages ago. I'm not the one SO TUNNELY that I am speculating that you must be a triple roleblocking Godfather. Like literally any possible thing you can think of that the scumteam might have is now part of my role so long as it justifies your worldview! Its actually absurd. You wanna know the truth? Im scumreading you because YOLOGUTLOL. You come off scummy to me. Your attitude feels way to focused/controlled and that makes the outbreak at Tammy look orchestrated. Your refusal to vote mastinand then agreeing with RG and/oi simply outright stating that Nacho is scummy for doing thisis just WOW. I see nothing but cognitive dissonance when I read your posts and blatant interpretation of NEW EVENTS IN THE THREAD with a preset lens to interpret them to fit your worldview.
In post 6557, CarbonFiber wrote:Okay, I agree. This was mostly what I was concerned about as wellIn post 6555, Red Gyarados wrote:Because I have no idea where his read flip on mastin came from
His read not only flipped but he championed the mastin lynch while not voting mastin at all
He was on that shit katsuki wagon so there's some BoP in this (same with AP and JSU)
I also don't trust him at all so of course this all should be taken with several grains of saltalthough I wouldn't say not voting Mastin was significant.
I intend to re-read the game as well tonight and I'll try to make sense of Foxhound and Magenta.In post 6795, AngryPidgeon wrote:Have I been doing this? I like to think not, but sure Im not going to claim to be flawless. I think you are scum. Im simply not hiding behind someone else's read and calling it infallible to hand-wave away a cop level clear on me. This is made especially egregious by your assertion that there are multiple cops in the game and I am one of the 2 claimed cops >.> <.< >.> <.<.
But no, you are right. Just keep doing your thing. Maybe later tonight I'll read some of the later RBD posts. I seem to recall them expressing similar sentiments to how I feel.
I'm trying to think of some way we can meet on the same ground andduel to the death,play a children's card game....to the deathactually look at things on the same page without whatever it is that ....I cant even think of a word to explain myself. But you get my point. I guess we just have personality differences? Or something? I do intend to continue reading D1 until Im sort of understanding the dynamic that is going on between us.
--
Lets actually do some activity together so we dont just keep saying the same shit. Foxhound and Magenta seem to both be ??? for us (although I have Fox more as null and Magenta more as scum). Lets both make talking points for these players with an open mind and compare them and see if we feel similarly?
You tell em! I have a very big heart and love you allIn post 6791, AngryPidgeon wrote: There is plenty of Tammy to go around for the both of you, play nice and share.
Are you getting after me here. If so beep beep.In post 6789, CarbonFiber wrote:This is just wrong. The only person who has been looking at everything is me. It is also such a generic accusation and I am not even sure what it is reference to.In post 6425, Titan wrote:And part of my problem is that you're not actually looking at everything.
I don't get this way of looking at things at all. AP was the one who was coming up with new ways to scumread me and I've pointed this out several times.In post 6425, Titan wrote:You're discounting some things because you have a *strong read* which is fine but coming up with new ways that AP is scum without for one second considering the possibility that JSU is scum is a whole metric fuckton of confirmation bias.
I explained it in my huge wall on BRO-Desp. I explained that their posting has been really town in the neighborhood. I can't see how that was missed. It is one thing to not be convinced but I don't get why you thinkIn post 6425, Titan wrote:I, for one, don't see how you can be so sure.I'mscum for townreading them other than my wall on Penguin in Wicked eliciting a similar reaction from her. It did because it was genuine. It means nothing for my affiliation if I can post genuine meta as scum.
I think Nacho is scum so I am scum with Nacho. I think AP is scum so I am scum with AP. Either way, I am scum. I am apparently finding new ways that AP is scum but not actually pushing him.In post 6425, Titan wrote:I have postulated that you are so sure because you guys are partnered because it's really the only reason why you've been going on about AP but not really pushing him and then using the Mastin scum read AP so he's scum scum scum!
I explained this already. My "town leader" thing about Pie was referring to Mastin's posts about him being a town leader and me saying that I trust Pie more than Mastin.In post 6425, Titan wrote:When Mastin isn't all that great at reading AP; I mean in Anything Goes he was 100% certain AP was scum when he was town telling like crazy. The day two suggestion that it should be AP instead of Mastin after you declared that Pieguy was the only person you trusted to lead the town and Pieguy was tunneling on Mastin. Why did you all of a sudden decide to suggest the day should go away from where the leader was saying to go? In some instances you look like you're trying to tie your partner AP to people in a weird manner.
Like, are you actually kidding me with the "Woah... Tammy, this is EXACTLY EXACTLY EXACTLY something I've been thinking and worried about. I haven't even mentioned it to Ceph yet because I thought it was too out there, but I feel so irrationally happy right now." This is just... bad.