Posted: Wed May 14, 2014 4:20 pm
I've completely given up on reading this game, and I still don't have a grasp as to what had happened during D1
That's right! Tammy's a loon! Don't listen to her, bad bad.In post 6823, CarbonFiber wrote:Because what he is agreeing with didn't make any sense.In post 6816, The Fox and the Hound wrote:I don't get what the issue with DV's post is. How is agreeing with someone about a concern opportunistic? I feel like a broken record but I feel like people *should* be reanalyzing/losing their shit, that is what you're supposed to do when you mislynch three times in a row is it not?
I just finished writing all my finals and am super excited to have some free time and I'll pour time into playing mafia.In post 6826, Titan wrote:That's right! Tammy's a loon! Don't listen to her, bad bad.In post 6823, CarbonFiber wrote:Because what he is agreeing with didn't make any sense.In post 6816, The Fox and the Hound wrote:I don't get what the issue with DV's post is. How is agreeing with someone about a concern opportunistic? I feel like a broken record but I feel like people *should* be reanalyzing/losing their shit, that is what you're supposed to do when you mislynch three times in a row is it not?
VOTE: magentaIn post 6820, magenta_thegreat wrote:that isn't really what I'm softing, but ok?In post 6791, AngryPidgeon wrote:magenta is softing a mass RB role.
Here's my thought process tracked down with reasons attached.In post 6834, Titan wrote:Falcon though as I'm taking a tiny break. What is up with your jumping all over the place with regards to me? In the beginning you *hoped* I was town, then you said after reading my ISO I was definitely town, then day three I was part of scum team that was going to mislynch you and in the midst of that you paralleled my scum game to nacho's (LOL?) was that really what you meant because FMPOV I have one of the worst scum games onsite, to you saying you'd be able to catch me as scum if you were town within 25 posts, to getting paranoid of me trolling at the lynch yesterday, to then saying that my paranoia today is town.
I mean, I get waffling, cuz I mean hello Princess Waffles here, but there's a level of mental whiplash there that is part not quite making sense/I can't figure out.
(I just want mafia to be more fun, I think people have been making it too serious/toxic/hostile environment lately across the board. I play my part, and I just want to have fun and not have it affect *me* as much as it does.)
So more on how your response is not actually a refutation at all later, but first, how does responding to/refuting an accusation mean that agreeing with that accusation is a detestable sin?In post 6788, CarbonFiber wrote:Are you fucking kidding me? I responded to that post ages ago.In post 6787, The Fox and the Hound wrote:Woah... Tammy, this is EXACTLY EXACTLY EXACTLY something I've been thinking and worried about. I haven't even mentioned it to Ceph yet because I thought it was too out there, but I feel so irrationally happy right now.
Um, you actually have been making a big show of how you suspect AP without ever trying to get him lynched, so I'm not really understanding the sarcasm here!In post 6789, CarbonFiber wrote:I am apparently finding new ways that AP is scum but not actually pushing him.
Yes I'm not allowed to even consider that you might be scum. Got it!In post 6789, CarbonFiber wrote:Like, are you actually kidding me with the "Woah... Tammy, this is EXACTLY EXACTLY EXACTLY something I've been thinking and worried about. I haven't even mentioned it to Ceph yet because I thought it was too out there, but I feel so irrationally happy right now." This is just... bad.
Ok I'm sick of this. You've happened to get me at a time when I don't care about the role stuff making you probably town and I'm not trying to pretend to understand why people wouldn't be townreading me (lucky you), so... WHY ARE WE NULL? (I've convinced myself the caps is actually because I don't want you to miss the question and not for any other reason). Both you and CF were previously townreading me/us for reasons I thought were pretty good! Now, even though I'm pretty sure I've been more transparent and more town than I've even been in my last ~10 town games (I mean, getting people to insult me as scum, seriously?), we get a nice, boring, inoffensive null. Problem for you two though is that I don't find it very inoffensive! If it was that we were pretty town but other people were just more town, then I'd think that was a bit odd, but I'd probably accept it (I actually feel the same way about a lot of people this game!), but I'm pretty sure scum view us as a scrumptious and juicy mislynch, and these nulls are exactly what I'd expect to happen (and CF grasping for reasons to scumread me too, how cute!)In post 6795, AngryPidgeon wrote:Foxhound and Magenta seem to both be ??? for us (although I have Fox more as null and Magenta more as scum).
Ok so to make it clear the big thing for me was the part about you having this really weird unfailingly strong read on AP but never actually trying to get him lynched (and I think the part I quoted was pretty mainly about that?). But no apparently I think you're not scumhunting and not looking at things from a town PoV. Ok then!In post 6805, CarbonFiber wrote:And then DV posts saying that somehow it all makes sense and agrees with it opportunistically.
Ok, so let's take a look at your grand 'you're not allowed to scumread me ever after this' refute.In post 6814, CarbonFiber wrote:I found DV's hop to be opportunistic and just overall scummy and that's why I refuted all the points to show why I disagreed with him.
1. 'My scumread is confbiasing so you can't call that a scumtell!' Oh wait...In post 6530, CarbonFiber wrote:You are talking about me confbiasing AP when AP has been confbiasing me since he entered the game. It is pretty obvious I am town here if you rethink everything I've done in this game. Day 1, I cc'd RBD when he fake-claimed miller. You know that my scumgame isn't at a level where I would do such a gambit. I don't care if people who don't know my playstyle think that I gambited but you know it is impossible coming from me. There's also not a chance I'd leave you alive over Pie who was townreading the absolute crap out of me because you are a massive threat to me as scum. I've played with you enough and read enough of your games that I know that if you truly want someone dead, it is highly unlikely that you'd be unable to drive the lynch through. There's no way, I'd let someone like that live on, least of all when they are very closely familiar with my game. Third, look at my activity level. I really shouldn't be posting in this game when I've been so busy - and yet I am. I've been trying really hard to figure this game out even amongst the chaos and the noise. Even, look at the tone of my posts for over 500 posts - walls and all. Look at my interactions with other players, with you etc. It is also really obvious that I genuinely believed in my suspicions of Mastin and Rancid wrong though they may be.
It was amazing! He posted exactly what I was thinking!In post 6815, CarbonFiber wrote:I'm going to head out. I want to hear comments about DV's recent post.
In post 6837, CarbonFiber wrote:I'm genuinely concerned about DV's posts. They feel scummy.
points, not postsIn post 6838, The Fox and the Hound wrote:posts
How am I not trying to get AP lynched exactly? Would you rather I ignore everything and everyone else in the game and scream from the rooftops that AP is scum? I can't force people to vote him if they don't want to.In post 6838, The Fox and the Hound wrote:Um, you actually have been making a big show of how you suspect AP without ever trying to get him lynched, so I'm not really understanding the sarcasm here!
That's not what I was saying though. The way you agreed with it smacks of scum townreading a townie. Most of your posts towards Tammy were of the "woah, I love this post" type variety, even for the more null posts and I don't find your responses genuine. The post you quoted especially doesn't resonate. You never re-evaluate your read there especially for someone preaching a lot of re-evaluating reads.In post 6838, The Fox and the Hound wrote:Yes I'm not allowed to even consider that you might be scum. Got it!In post 6789, CarbonFiber wrote:Like, are you actually kidding me with the "Woah... Tammy, this is EXACTLY EXACTLY EXACTLY something I've been thinking and worried about. I haven't even mentioned it to Ceph yet because I thought it was too out there, but I feel so irrationally happy right now." This is just... bad.
You are null because neither your nor Cephrir's catch up posts were awesome. I disliked them quite a bit. They picked up on ridiculously irrelevant stuff. Nothing I saw in there felt like an attempt at scumhunting. They are massively positional. The points you picked up on seemed like they serve an agenda of laying down a trajectory of reads development so that you eventually wind up scumreading players that you want to scumread and townreading players that you want to townread. For example, 6570 is massively opportunistic. Defense of Tammy, questioning of RG and JSU, some pointless line about me that I don't even understand the purpose of. You've decided who you need to agree with and who you need to disagree with and it feels like you are tailoring your posts to that end. More positional junk in 6402. 6058 was just bad. 5606 is geared towards directing the lynch and a setup for your eventual vote. You disagree with Cupcake and agree with AP, never mind the strength of their respective points. 5360 was incredibly underwhelming and the mechanical questioning was awfully fluffly.In post 6838, The Fox and the Hound wrote:Ok I'm sick of this. You've happened to get me at a time when I don't care about the role stuff making you probably town and I'm not trying to pretend to understand why people wouldn't be townreading me (lucky you), so... WHY ARE WE NULL? (I've convinced myself the caps is actually because I don't want you to miss the question and not for any other reason). Both you and CF were previously townreading me/us for reasons I thought were pretty good! Now, even though I'm pretty sure I've been more transparent and more town than I've even been in my last ~10 town games (I mean, getting people to insult me as scum, seriously?), we get a nice, boring, inoffensive null. Problem for you two though is that I don't find it very inoffensive! If it was that we were pretty town but other people were just more town, then I'd think that was a bit odd, but I'd probably accept it (I actually feel the same way about a lot of people this game!), but I'm pretty sure scum view us as a scrumptious and juicy mislynch, and these nulls are exactly what I'd expect to happen (and CF grasping for reasons to scumread me too, how cute!)In post 6795, AngryPidgeon wrote:Foxhound and Magenta seem to both be ??? for us (although I have Fox more as null and Magenta more as scum).
Which doesn't make sense because I've been trying to do it as much as possible while not losing sight of the game as a whole.In post 6838, The Fox and the Hound wrote:Ok so to make it clear the big thing for me was the part about you having this really weird unfailingly strong read on AP but never actually trying to get him lynched (and I think the part I quoted was pretty mainly about that?). But no apparently I think you're not scumhunting and not looking at things from a town PoV. Ok then!In post 6805, CarbonFiber wrote:And then DV posts saying that somehow it all makes sense and agrees with it opportunistically.
That's not what I was saying. I was talking about mindset. I pointed out several times that AP kept continuing to bring up new reasons to suspect me since the time he entered the game and I found it scummy and even pointed it out to Tammy several times and no reaction. And out of the blue she accuses me of conf-biasing a read on AP, and it is just wtf. Your "oh, just what I was thinking" in response to that felt really ridiculous. If you had posted something like "to be fair, AP was doing it too," it would have been easy to see you thinking critically about it. But I don't see any critical thinking at all especially when it came to Tammy's posts. Was there one you disagreed with?In post 6838, The Fox and the Hound wrote:Ok, so let's take a look at your grand 'you're not allowed to scumread me ever after this' refute.In post 6814, CarbonFiber wrote:I found DV's hop to be opportunistic and just overall scummy and that's why I refuted all the points to show why I disagreed with him.
1. 'My scumread is confbiasing so you can't call that a scumtell!' Oh wait...In post 6530, CarbonFiber wrote:You are talking about me confbiasing AP when AP has been confbiasing me since he entered the game. It is pretty obvious I am town here if you rethink everything I've done in this game. Day 1, I cc'd RBD when he fake-claimed miller. You know that my scumgame isn't at a level where I would do such a gambit. I don't care if people who don't know my playstyle think that I gambited but you know it is impossible coming from me. There's also not a chance I'd leave you alive over Pie who was townreading the absolute crap out of me because you are a massive threat to me as scum. I've played with you enough and read enough of your games that I know that if you truly want someone dead, it is highly unlikely that you'd be unable to drive the lynch through. There's no way, I'd let someone like that live on, least of all when they are very closely familiar with my game. Third, look at my activity level. I really shouldn't be posting in this game when I've been so busy - and yet I am. I've been trying really hard to figure this game out even amongst the chaos and the noise. Even, look at the tone of my posts for over 500 posts - walls and all. Look at my interactions with other players, with you etc. It is also really obvious that I genuinely believed in my suspicions of Mastin and Rancid wrong though they may be.
2. 'I'll just ignore your other posts and talk about how town I am' Ok, I don't think that's scummy, but it's not really refuting anything, is it? (I'll probably say my thoughts on this when I actually decide what I think. Believe it or not I still don't know if you're a scumread yet!)
Apart from the last thing I'm not sure on what happened as I haven't gone through your ISO properly, but that's along the lines of what I've been thinking.In post 6116, CarbonFiber wrote:However, I also like DV's latest catchup walls and it feels like he is genuinely trying to figure out the game.
Also, my point was that there was nothing in that post that actually refuted what I was concerned about (probably not what Tammy was concerned about either), so you thinking like that was some big deal struck me as really odd and possibly struggling to find a reason to scumread us.In post 6840, CarbonFiber wrote:That's not what I was saying. I was talking about mindset.
I think we are referring to different things. I was referring to more of Tammy's push on me about "coming up with new ways that AP is scum" while ignoring my multitude of posts pointing out that AP was doing the same thing so it felt odd that you went "oh, I agree" instead of "isn't AP doing it too?" I didn't realize your actual fear was both AP and I being scum.In post 6842, The Fox and the Hound wrote:Also, my point was that there was nothing in that post that actually refuted what I was concerned about (probably not what Tammy was concerned about either), so you thinking like that was some big deal struck me as really odd and possibly struggling to find a reason to scumread us.In post 6840, CarbonFiber wrote:That's not what I was saying. I was talking about mindset.
Why doesn't Nacho seem to be scum this game? Can you elaborate on your townread on Red Gyarados?In post 6824, magenta_thegreat wrote:1 Kagura (borkjerfkin + nachomamma8)
2 The Fox and the Hound (cephrir and DV)
4 Magenta_thegreat (mara and orci) 4 orcinus_theoriginal
5 Titan (Tammy + Sir Arthur Dane)
10 Carbon Fiber (FourTrouble and F16)
13 Red Gyarados (Brian Skies and notscience)
15 PeregrineV
16 Penguin_Alien16 Clyton
and if that were the case, that would mean all four scum would be somewhere in this list.
I don't think you are Arthur are scum, I don't think Gary is scum, and I know for sure that I'm not scum. Nacho doesn't seem to be scum this game, either but that's a read I'm not to sure on, which would mean the scum team is this
2 The Fox and the Hound (cephrir and DV)
10 Carbon Fiber (FourTrouble and F16)
15 PeregrineV
16 Penguin_Alien16 Clyton
this list is a little worrisome, though because it doesn't seem all to likely even as a PoE
Could you please stop posting this? It is irritating me. Nothing I'm doing this game has an attempt to "get at you" or at least not intentionally and I have no desire to do that.In post 6799, Titan wrote:Are you getting after me here.
Well the whole Cupcake lynch/AP thing is what I want to investigate, and I may as well do it along with the rest of your ISO. I plan to get onto that tonight.In post 6843, CarbonFiber wrote:If you've been reading the game, you'd have noticed that there was really no chance of anything other than a Cupcake lynch happening. I pushed AP against Cupcake but no one was listening and I just sort of gave up because some people seemed determine to push through the Cupcake lynch and not consider that AP was scum. And if the Cupcake lynch was happening, I wanted it to happen sooner rather than later. As for voting, please don't ask me why I am voting or not voting any particular player or when I choose to vote or not vote. You are not going to get anywhere.
Day 2, I suspected Mastin with AP as a second suspect. Mastin wagon was what was happening. That was the lynch that was going to go through - the one on my top suspect so naturally I pushed that lynch harder. I wondered if Mastin was town a few times before deadline and that's why I suggested lynching AP. I guess it is not impossible for scum to keep their buddies as their second/third suspects while pushing town lynches but the entire interaction between AP and me since he joined the game makes it unlikely that we are buddies and it should be fairly obvious to anyone. In any case, what is your read on AP? Are you scumreading him?
I suspect you =/= setting you up for a lynch. You've been doing this with nearly everyone that suspects you in this game. I said I liked DV's analysis and effort into the JSU/AP/Cupcake team but I didn't like a lot of the other posts that I linked above.
Also, if you suspect a me/AP team, quit being completely ridiculous and help me lynch him then.
See this is what confuses me. Everyone always goes on about how having good reads is only half the battle, and it has been mentioned many a time that my lack of confidence impedes me in this regard, but this kind of attitude surprises me from you and has me wondering whether you're only justifying it so that it fits with your play this game.In post 6844, CarbonFiber wrote:I think we are referring to different things. I was referring to more of Tammy's push on me about "coming up with new ways that AP is scum" while ignoring my multitude of posts pointing out that AP was doing the same thing so it felt odd that you went "oh, I agree" instead of "isn't AP doing it too?" I didn't realize your actual fear was both AP and I being scum.In post 6842, The Fox and the Hound wrote:Also, my point was that there was nothing in that post that actually refuted what I was concerned about (probably not what Tammy was concerned about either), so you thinking like that was some big deal struck me as really odd and possibly struggling to find a reason to scumread us.In post 6840, CarbonFiber wrote:That's not what I was saying. I was talking about mindset.
Also, I take back what I wrote about helping me lynch AP in my previous post. I got serious again after swearing I'd let AP and Nacho win and congratulate them at endgame so. It if up to the town to figure shit out and I'm not going to push the town into lynching my scumspects.
oopsIn post 6847, DeasVail wrote:Well the whole Cupcake lynch/AP thing is what I want to investigate, and I may as well do it along with the rest of your ISO. I plan to get onto that tonight.In post 6843, CarbonFiber wrote:If you've been reading the game, you'd have noticed that there was really no chance of anything other than a Cupcake lynch happening. I pushed AP against Cupcake but no one was listening and I just sort of gave up because some people seemed determine to push through the Cupcake lynch and not consider that AP was scum. And if the Cupcake lynch was happening, I wanted it to happen sooner rather than later. As for voting, please don't ask me why I am voting or not voting any particular player or when I choose to vote or not vote. You are not going to get anywhere.
Day 2, I suspected Mastin with AP as a second suspect. Mastin wagon was what was happening. That was the lynch that was going to go through - the one on my top suspect so naturally I pushed that lynch harder. I wondered if Mastin was town a few times before deadline and that's why I suggested lynching AP. I guess it is not impossible for scum to keep their buddies as their second/third suspects while pushing town lynches but the entire interaction between AP and me since he joined the game makes it unlikely that we are buddies and it should be fairly obvious to anyone. In any case, what is your read on AP? Are you scumreading him?
I suspect you =/= setting you up for a lynch. You've been doing this with nearly everyone that suspects you in this game. I said I liked DV's analysis and effort into the JSU/AP/Cupcake team but I didn't like a lot of the other posts that I linked above.
Also, if you suspect a me/AP team, quit being completely ridiculous and help me lynch him then.
I think my AP read is as it was when I posted my reads list last night, and as indicated there, I currently think you more likely scum than him, but as I also said there, I feel that apart from JSU and Titan (and who actually knows with them really?) I don't have a good grasp on the game at all.
Well of course you're going to say that you're not setting me up for a lynch. Even now you could go back on it and find me scummy enough to lynch or whatever. You said you liked my catch-up walls (I'm pretty sure this more accurately describes the posts you just said you don't like than JSU/Cupcake/AP but I plan on thinking about that as I ISO) and then you said you didn't, so obviously if you're scum that kind of thing is not beyond you.
I do worry about being too OMGUSy, but I feel like I've had good reason every time I have lashed out at someone for suspecting me, and it's not like I've ever relentlessly pushed a lynch because of it. With Stalin, ffery was using something as a scumtell that applied to the two main town games we shared. Nacho is nacho, and with you, it seems like you have contradicted yourself (although I am cautious about this) and I've explained why I think your response to my agreement with Tammy was kind of bad.
There's also the fact that unless the scum are all among the top universal townreads (in which case we're all probably doomed anyway) they're probably running out of mislynches to procure, and even though I think we've been really town, we're obviously not townread strongly by anyone with a lot of influence, so it makes complete sense that scum would want us lynched, and we're probably one of the easier ones left to get. So even though I'm not going to get carried away with ranting about people suspecting me, I'm definitely going to consider it and pressure people where I can.
See this is what confuses me. Everyone always goes on about how having good reads is only half the battle, and it has been mentioned many a time that my lack of confidence impedes me in this regard, but this kind of attitude surprises me from you and has me wondering whether you're only justifying it so that it fits with your play this game.In post 6844, CarbonFiber wrote:I think we are referring to different things. I was referring to more of Tammy's push on me about "coming up with new ways that AP is scum" while ignoring my multitude of posts pointing out that AP was doing the same thing so it felt odd that you went "oh, I agree" instead of "isn't AP doing it too?" I didn't realize your actual fear was both AP and I being scum.In post 6842, The Fox and the Hound wrote:Also, my point was that there was nothing in that post that actually refuted what I was concerned about (probably not what Tammy was concerned about either), so you thinking like that was some big deal struck me as really odd and possibly struggling to find a reason to scumread us.In post 6840, CarbonFiber wrote:That's not what I was saying. I was talking about mindset.
Also, I take back what I wrote about helping me lynch AP in my previous post. I got serious again after swearing I'd let AP and Nacho win and congratulate them at endgame so. It if up to the town to figure shit out and I'm not going to push the town into lynching my scumspects.
And if you are town I'm really sorry for losing it earlier.
So, you think AP is town but think that I am scum because AP (your townread) was my secondary suspect? I don't see how your read on me changes from town to scum through agreement with Tammy saying we're scum together when you are not even sold on AP being scum. Elaborate on this.In post 6847, DeasVail wrote:I think my AP read is as it was when I posted my reads list last night, and as indicated there, I currently think you more likely scum than him, but as I also said there, I feel that apart from JSU and Titan (and who actually knows with them really?) I don't have a good grasp on the game at all.
Well, reads change - it is the reasoning for the change that matters. Why are acting like everyone that questions you is out there to lynch you and is scum setting you up? Like, it should be really obvious that I am trying to figure out your affiliation and it comes across as even wierder that your read changes from town to scum upon being questioned.In post 6847, DeasVail wrote:Well of course you're going to say that you're not setting me up for a lynch. Even now you could go back on it and find me scummy enough to lynch or whatever.
I liked some of your catch up walls, didn't like others. IIn post 6847, DeasVail wrote:You said you liked my catch-up walls (I'm pretty sure this more accurately describes the posts you just said you don't like than JSU/Cupcake/AP but I plan on thinking about that as I ISO) and then you said you didn't, so obviously if you're scum that kind of thing is not beyond you.
Is this something you routinely do in your town games?In post 6847, DeasVail wrote:I do worry about being too OMGUSy, but I feel like I've had good reason every time I have lashed out at someone for suspecting me, and it's not like I've ever relentlessly pushed a lynch because of it. With Stalin, ffery was using something as a scumtell that applied to the two main town games we shared. Nacho is nacho, and with you, it seems like you have contradicted yourself (although I am cautious about this) and I've explained why I think your response to my agreement with Tammy was kind of bad.
Okay, I can sort of see this as town. I guess it is just annoying when you react to questioning/suspicion by "you are suspecting me, ergo scum" because that sort of a response doesn't help me figure you out, and if you are town, it doesn't help me realize that.In post 6847, DeasVail wrote:There's also the fact that unless the scum are all among the top universal townreads (in which case we're all probably doomed anyway) they're probably running out of mislynches to procure, and even though I think we've been really town, we're obviously not townread strongly by anyone with a lot of influence, so it makes complete sense that scum would want us lynched, and we're probably one of the easier ones left to get. So even though I'm not going to get carried away with ranting about people suspecting me, I'm definitely going to consider it and pressure people where I can.
I am not exactly sure what you are talking about here. Mind rephrasing? What attitude from me surprises you, you seem to be implying that you expect a certain attitude from me?In post 6842, The Fox and the Hound wrote: See this is what confuses me. Everyone always goes on about how having good reads is only half the battle, and it has been mentioned many a time that my lack of confidence impedes me in this regard, but this kind of attitude surprises me from you and has me wondering whether you're only justifying it so that it fits with your play this game. And if you are town I'm really sorry for losing it earlier.