Alyssa The Lamb wrote:I don't know if we can reconcile that to agreement, taly
Oof but is that scum or town disagreeing more
Posted: Mon Jan 03, 2022 4:39 pm
by Alyssa The Lamb
I mean I don't know if we can agree on which of ydra and rh9 is scum
Posted: Mon Jan 03, 2022 4:40 pm
by Taly
Hmmmmm.
What is the strongest 4p in your opinion atm?
Posted: Mon Jan 03, 2022 4:43 pm
by Taly
I'm going to bed nighties
Posted: Mon Jan 03, 2022 4:43 pm
by Alyssa The Lamb
My pairing and GL/Dats, but it changes based on next flip I think
Posted: Mon Jan 03, 2022 4:44 pm
by PookyTheMagicalBear
Posted: Mon Jan 03, 2022 4:48 pm
by RH9
In regards to S_S, I dislike 6861 and 6905 for referencing outdated reads and PoEs and trying to divert attention to them. I dislike his 6832 which reads like an excuse to ignore potential perspective slips.
If I had to pick between voting S_S/Galron and GL/Datisi, I will definitely vote the former.
Posted: Mon Jan 03, 2022 4:50 pm
by Something_Smart
In post 6931, RH9 wrote:referencing outdated reads and PoEs and trying to divert attention to them
In post 6931, RH9 wrote:referencing outdated reads and PoEs and trying to divert attention to them
Why is that bad?
Because reads change all the time and maybe the people you referenced no longer think that you are T/T with Galron but you are using their old reads as a basis of 'look, Titus (who flipped Town) and HQ (who also flipped Town) think that my pair is T/T'. Then, you divert attention to these outdated reads when using recent content, the same players that you are referencing might no longer have the same read. Plus, did you never reference Firebringer? No. You did not. Firebringer wasn't a fan of your pair but you are acting all 'look at the people who think that I'm Town' and ignoring Firebringer. Naturally, his reads are probably outdated too.
If you are going to reference outdated reads and PoEs, please don't cherry pick them.
Posted: Mon Jan 03, 2022 4:57 pm
by RH9
And I think that you doing something like that is off-putting.
Posted: Mon Jan 03, 2022 4:59 pm
by Something_Smart
Titus and Harley were adamant that my pair was town. FB was not adamant about any read. It's not a cherry-pick.
Posted: Mon Jan 03, 2022 5:07 pm
by RH9
In post 6935, Something_Smart wrote:Titus and Harley were adamant that my pair was town. FB was not adamant about any read. It's not a cherry-pick.
But why did you ignore Firebringer?
Posted: Mon Jan 03, 2022 5:08 pm
by RH9
You only mentioned the two people who were 'adamant' that your pair 'was town'.
Posted: Mon Jan 03, 2022 5:57 pm
by GuiltyLion
In post 6935, Something_Smart wrote:Titus and Harley were adamant that my pair was town. FB was not adamant about any read. It's not a cherry-pick.
In post 6935, Something_Smart wrote:Titus and Harley were adamant that my pair was town. FB was not adamant about any read. It's not a cherry-pick.
FB was adamant Datisi and I was T/T
S_S, explain why you ignored this but advocated for looking into Titus and HQ. This definitely feels like cherry-picking to ignore that Firebringer 'was adamant' that Datisi and GL was T/T.
Posted: Mon Jan 03, 2022 6:41 pm
by RH9
Everybody, what do you think of S_S cherry-picking outdated reads and PoEs?
Posted: Mon Jan 03, 2022 6:45 pm
by Something_Smart
I didn't recall him being that confident, but looking back it looks like he was. Honestly my bad.
UNVOTE:
Posted: Mon Jan 03, 2022 6:46 pm
by RH9
In post 6941, Something_Smart wrote:I didn't recall him being that confident, but looking back it looks like he was. Honestly my bad.
UNVOTE:
So the cherry-picking was a mistake?
Posted: Mon Jan 03, 2022 6:47 pm
by Something_Smart
Yes. I didn't remember that FB was as confident as he was on GL/Datisi town.
Posted: Mon Jan 03, 2022 6:48 pm
by RH9
In post 6943, Something_Smart wrote:Yes. I didn't remember that FB was as confident as he was on GL/Datisi town.
because norwe was considering the open proposal when one with you was already there
and you sniped it
Posted: Mon Jan 03, 2022 8:21 pm
by GuiltyLion
one other random thought I had before I go to bed
unless Alyssa is like the try hardiest mafia player to ever grace this site, 6705 effectively confirms that Alyssa/RH9 is never scum-scum. so that also eases some paranoia I've had at points this game around scum!Alyssa protecting buddy scum!RH9, because that's just not a realistic scenario by any stretch now.
Posted: Mon Jan 03, 2022 8:27 pm
by Alyssa The Lamb
My entire philosophy of how to play scum makes 6705 proof by itself
Posted: Mon Jan 03, 2022 8:28 pm
by Alyssa The Lamb
In post 6705, Alyssa The Lamb wrote:194/195/196/197/198/199/200/201/202/203/204/205/206/207/208/209 - (RH9) - A lot more small posts about the S_S/Implosion thing, admitted he was talking about Implosion mainly and stuff about the reaction test
This by itself is probably my favorite part
Posted: Mon Jan 03, 2022 8:28 pm
by GuiltyLion
in fact, I think enough people have made comments about their PTs that I don't think any pair remaining is S-S
not that that's especially useful, but something that hadn't kinda clicked for me until just now
I'll try to get my head on a bit more straight tomorrow but I kinda think it's just Galron + Ydra or Datisi. Datisi is mostly out of fear that he's being low key survivalist today and doesn't seem all that worried about me whatsoever. I've felt a lot of mindmeld with him but I can't rule out that Datisi thinks similarly enough to me that he
