Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2022 7:33 pm
This looks like the plan IMO. Fire made sure Malcolm and VP went down first and positioned himself to get credit for Titus.In post 6918, fireisredsir wrote:i caught titus and
This looks like the plan IMO. Fire made sure Malcolm and VP went down first and positioned himself to get credit for Titus.In post 6918, fireisredsir wrote:i caught titus and
So where is your vote?In post 6925, Frogsterking wrote:This looks like the plan IMO. Fire made sure Malcolm and VP went down first and positioned himself to get credit for Titus.In post 6918, fireisredsir wrote:i caught titus and
Why force the boolean?
In post 6917, fireisredsir wrote:frog is scum who did not plan well enough for today and is trying to look genuine but did not choose the correct direction to go lol
Looks like I caught a live oneIn post 6918, fireisredsir wrote:i caught titus and convinced like all of the wagon to vote there. give me my poe for today at least
???
Could be SvS if fire is scum.In post 6929, Frogsterking wrote:In post 6917, fireisredsir wrote:frog is scum who did not plan well enough for today and is trying to look genuine but did not choose the correct direction to go lolLooks like I caught a live oneIn post 6918, fireisredsir wrote:i caught titus and convinced like all of the wagon to vote there. give me my poe for today at least
April and Frog are scums
Why do you say this?
what if i boldly communicate my block formingIn post 6931, MathBlade wrote:Not really liking all the bold declarations in thread versus communicating and block forming.
That’d be a good idea.In post 6934, fireisredsir wrote:what if i boldly communicate my block formingIn post 6931, MathBlade wrote:Not really liking all the bold declarations in thread versus communicating and block forming.
Mainly VCA, and minor things I might be able to articulate more tomorrow when I’m awake, but 90% vcaIn post 6933, MathBlade wrote:Why do you say this?
Why the snark?
I would rather not be held to that boolean until you show your work because it’s a word I considered.In post 6936, Scorpious wrote:Mainly VCA, and minor things I might be able to articulate more tomorrow when I’m awake, but 90% vcaIn post 6933, MathBlade wrote:Why do you say this?
Cover my nose in brownies, Mr ShatnerIn post 6935, MathBlade wrote:That’d be a good idea.In post 6934, fireisredsir wrote:what if i boldly communicate my block formingIn post 6931, MathBlade wrote:Not really liking all the bold declarations in thread versus communicating and block forming.
Because right now I think you’re boldly going where no scum has gone before
(Brownie points if you get the reference)
Take your brownie points but it’s actually Gene Rodenberry as Kirk never said the linesIn post 6940, Galron wrote:Cover my nose in brownies, Mr ShatnerIn post 6935, MathBlade wrote:That’d be a good idea.In post 6934, fireisredsir wrote:what if i boldly communicate my block formingIn post 6931, MathBlade wrote:Not really liking all the bold declarations in thread versus communicating and block forming.
Because right now I think you’re boldly going where no scum has gone before
(Brownie points if you get the reference)
given Titus could roleblock people, I bet scum were roleblocking Enchant which is why they didn't die earlierIn post 6845, tenebrousluminary wrote:Curious. I had planned my first post to be quoting Titus' role PM and voting Enchant.
im not old enough to get the reference (but i do get it anyway. the final frontier!)In post 6935, MathBlade wrote:That’d be a good idea.In post 6934, fireisredsir wrote:what if i boldly communicate my block formingIn post 6931, MathBlade wrote:Not really liking all the bold declarations in thread versus communicating and block forming.
Because right now I think you’re boldly going where no scum has gone before
(Brownie points if you get the reference)
Yeah this is a bad look imhoIn post 6944, fireisredsir wrote:im not old enough to get the reference (but i do get it anyway. the final frontier!)In post 6935, MathBlade wrote:That’d be a good idea.In post 6934, fireisredsir wrote:what if i boldly communicate my block formingIn post 6931, MathBlade wrote:Not really liking all the bold declarations in thread versus communicating and block forming.
Because right now I think you’re boldly going where no scum has gone before
(Brownie points if you get the reference)
my personal block is me/math/april/std/deas. galron, tene, and scorp are a bit weaker. the other 3 have at least 2 scum in them imo
I don’t know what Boolean meansIn post 6938, MathBlade wrote:I would rather not be held to that boolean until you show your work because it’s a word I considered.In post 6936, Scorpious wrote:Mainly VCA, and minor things I might be able to articulate more tomorrow when I’m awake, but 90% vcaIn post 6933, MathBlade wrote:
Why do you say this?