Page 29 of 31

Posted: Wed May 13, 2009 6:44 am
by charter
Vote Count



Not Voting (5)

Debonair Danny DiPietro
Wall-E
Spolium
mykonian
Empking

With 5 alive, it takes 3 to lynch! Deadline is May 21st at Midnight EST.

Posted: Wed May 13, 2009 6:53 am
by Empking
Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:
Empking wrote:
Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:
Spolium wrote:@DDD: Who do you think are the remaining scum, and why?
I think Empking is scum. I think with as many power roles as we've seen come out that scum has to have a roleblocker. With the knowledge of caf's alignment it becomes even harder to see why he would be blocked by a pro-town roleblocker since the transgressions I voted on primarily occurred on D2. Couple that with his voting history and I'm fairly certain he's scum.
.
This may seem crazy but I don't roleblock based on what you think.
No, you seemingly roleblock based on the alignment of the moons of Jupiter or at least that'd be as logical as whatever convoluted theory you tossed out to us as your reasoning.
Caf was scummy day one. That's not crazy and you're scum for acting like it is.

Posted: Wed May 13, 2009 7:05 am
by Debonair Danny DiPietro
Empking wrote:
Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:
Empking wrote:
Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:
Spolium wrote:@DDD: Who do you think are the remaining scum, and why?
I think Empking is scum. I think with as many power roles as we've seen come out that scum has to have a roleblocker. With the knowledge of caf's alignment it becomes even harder to see why he would be blocked by a pro-town roleblocker since the transgressions I voted on primarily occurred on D2. Couple that with his voting history and I'm fairly certain he's scum.
.
This may seem crazy but I don't roleblock based on what you think.
No, you seemingly roleblock based on the alignment of the moons of Jupiter or at least that'd be as logical as whatever convoluted theory you tossed out to us as your reasoning.
Caf was scummy day one. That's not crazy and you're scum for acting like it is.
Then why no mention of caf as possible scum from you on day one? No hints, no suggestions, no questions. If you did have such inclinations and withheld them from the town that's fairly anti-town behavior. And then there's the much debated quote where early in D2 you noted that caf seemed pro-town. I find it hard to believe you pivoted 180 degrees that quickly from believing caf to be scum, worthy of roleblocking, to appearing pro-town.

Posted: Wed May 13, 2009 7:06 am
by Debonair Danny DiPietro
mykonian wrote:DDD, how good are you as scum?
Good.

Posted: Wed May 13, 2009 7:08 am
by Empking
Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:
Empking wrote:
Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:
Empking wrote:
Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:
Spolium wrote:@DDD: Who do you think are the remaining scum, and why?
I think Empking is scum. I think with as many power roles as we've seen come out that scum has to have a roleblocker. With the knowledge of caf's alignment it becomes even harder to see why he would be blocked by a pro-town roleblocker since the transgressions I voted on primarily occurred on D2. Couple that with his voting history and I'm fairly certain he's scum.
.
This may seem crazy but I don't roleblock based on what you think.
No, you seemingly roleblock based on the alignment of the moons of Jupiter or at least that'd be as logical as whatever convoluted theory you tossed out to us as your reasoning.
Caf was scummy day one. That's not crazy and you're scum for acting like it is.
Then why no mention of caf as possible scum from you on day one? No hints, no suggestions, no questions. If you did have such inclinations and withheld them from the town that's fairly anti-town behavior. And then there's the much debated quote where early in D2 you noted that caf seemed pro-town. I find it hard to believe you pivoted 180 degrees that quickly from believing caf to be scum, worthy of roleblocking, to appearing pro-town.
My mine reason for thinking he was scum was his lurking. I , crazily. it seemed that other people could also see what I could see.

Posted: Thu May 14, 2009 8:41 am
by mykonian
Danny did some good things in the last end!

vote empking


I guess something will happen now.

Posted: Thu May 14, 2009 10:32 am
by mykonian
ok, not :(

unvote

Posted: Fri May 15, 2009 2:26 am
by mykonian
wie is de burgemeester van wezel?

ezel
ezel
ezel

Posted: Fri May 15, 2009 2:33 am
by Debonair Danny DiPietro
Still waiting for Wall-E to show up at all "today" and for Spolium to make another appearance before I decide anything. I'm not sure what the hell myk was doing in the preceding couple of posts though.

Posted: Fri May 15, 2009 6:23 am
by mykonian
bumping the thread. It stood way too low.

The last sentence was a dutch "echo" sentence.

The first two, were voting, seeing what happened, and unvoting when I couldn't watch the thread anymore.

Posted: Fri May 15, 2009 6:24 am
by Empking
I think Spoilum lurking is veeery telling.

Posted: Fri May 15, 2009 6:28 am
by mykonian
vote Empking


that is a subjective sentence, that doesn't add anything, and only tries to get suspicion on Spolium.

Posted: Fri May 15, 2009 6:30 am
by mykonian
I'm not going to unvote that soon this time

Posted: Fri May 15, 2009 6:44 am
by Empking
mykonian wrote:
vote Empking


that is a subjective sentence, that doesn't add anything, and only tries to get suspicion on Spolium.
that is a subjective sentence, that doesn't add anything, and only tries to get suspicion on Empking.

Posted: Fri May 15, 2009 10:02 am
by mykonian
I think I pointed pretty well out, what it is that is scummy and why it is scummy. I can't get it more objective then that.

so please defend.

Posted: Fri May 15, 2009 10:54 pm
by Empking
mykonian wrote:I think I pointed pretty well out, what it is that is scummy and why it is scummy.
You think wrong.
I can't get it more objective then that.
If you can't then I worry for you.
so please defend.
I stated a fact,. That's better than what you did.

Posted: Fri May 15, 2009 10:55 pm
by Empking
Prod: Spoilum
?

Posted: Sat May 16, 2009 12:10 am
by mykonian
Empking wrote:I think Spoilum lurking is veeery telling.
I don't think this is a fact. You are just turning something that is not scummy, and pretty normal in this game, because you, wall-e and Spolium were away, into something that is scummy for him.

and thank you for the insults. I love you too. It also doesn't help to move my vote.

Posted: Sat May 16, 2009 12:18 am
by Empking
mykonian wrote:
Empking wrote:I think Spoilum lurking is veeery telling.
I don't think this is a fact.
How is it not a fact. Ib think I should know best about what I think.

and thank you for the insults. I love you too. It also doesn't help to move my vote.
What insults?

Posted: Sat May 16, 2009 12:32 am
by mykonian
If you can't then I worry for you.
it doesn't help you.

Posted: Sat May 16, 2009 12:50 am
by Empking
mykonian wrote:
If you can't then I worry for you.
it doesn't help you.
Sorry, I thought that was obvious that I merely disbelieved you couldn't say something more objective.

Posted: Sat May 16, 2009 2:54 am
by Spolium
Timmaaaah! RAAH.

I'm here. Busy week, but I also wanted to see what Wall-E had to say. I expected something from him sooner.

@Myklonian - Refresh my memory... what do you find scummy about Emp? Also, I find it odd that you haven't really been pushing your case on him with conviction. What's up with the vote/unvote/vote? Please explain.

mod: prod Wall-E please


Tiiiiiiihaaaaargh. Tibleh

Posted: Sat May 16, 2009 2:59 am
by mykonian
ok, first point, while I first pointed out that his play resembled the play I saw from him, and voted him for that, his claim seemed good to me, and I stopped thinking about it. Now, after some players I saw as protown stayed alive, and assuming two scum, he must be one of them.

The vote-unvote was a controlled vote to see what would happen. The vote now, is because I can really not see town making that post, he is only trying to shift attention to you, without any scumhunting intent.

Posted: Sat May 16, 2009 4:11 am
by Empking
mykonian wrote:ok, first point, while I first pointed out that his play resembled the play I saw from him, and voted him for that, his claim seemed good to me, and I stopped thinking about it. Now, after some players I saw as protown stayed alive, and assuming two scum, he must be one of them.

The vote-unvote was a controlled vote to see what would happen. The vote now, is because I can really not see town making that post, he is only trying to shift attention to you, without any scumhunting intent.
What is the scumhunting intent of your posts?

Posted: Sat May 16, 2009 4:37 am
by mykonian
I am sorry, but could you restate that question? It is probably me, but short as it is, I have trouble to get what it means without context.