Posted: Wed May 13, 2009 6:44 am
Vote Count
Not Voting (5)
Debonair Danny DiPietro
Wall-E
Spolium
mykonian
Empking
With 5 alive, it takes 3 to lynch! Deadline is May 21st at Midnight EST.
Caf was scummy day one. That's not crazy and you're scum for acting like it is.Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:No, you seemingly roleblock based on the alignment of the moons of Jupiter or at least that'd be as logical as whatever convoluted theory you tossed out to us as your reasoning.Empking wrote:This may seem crazy but I don't roleblock based on what you think.Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:I think Empking is scum. I think with as many power roles as we've seen come out that scum has to have a roleblocker. With the knowledge of caf's alignment it becomes even harder to see why he would be blocked by a pro-town roleblocker since the transgressions I voted on primarily occurred on D2. Couple that with his voting history and I'm fairly certain he's scum.Spolium wrote:@DDD: Who do you think are the remaining scum, and why?
.
Then why no mention of caf as possible scum from you on day one? No hints, no suggestions, no questions. If you did have such inclinations and withheld them from the town that's fairly anti-town behavior. And then there's the much debated quote where early in D2 you noted that caf seemed pro-town. I find it hard to believe you pivoted 180 degrees that quickly from believing caf to be scum, worthy of roleblocking, to appearing pro-town.Empking wrote:Caf was scummy day one. That's not crazy and you're scum for acting like it is.Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:No, you seemingly roleblock based on the alignment of the moons of Jupiter or at least that'd be as logical as whatever convoluted theory you tossed out to us as your reasoning.Empking wrote:This may seem crazy but I don't roleblock based on what you think.Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:I think Empking is scum. I think with as many power roles as we've seen come out that scum has to have a roleblocker. With the knowledge of caf's alignment it becomes even harder to see why he would be blocked by a pro-town roleblocker since the transgressions I voted on primarily occurred on D2. Couple that with his voting history and I'm fairly certain he's scum.Spolium wrote:@DDD: Who do you think are the remaining scum, and why?
.
Good.mykonian wrote:DDD, how good are you as scum?
My mine reason for thinking he was scum was his lurking. I , crazily. it seemed that other people could also see what I could see.Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:Then why no mention of caf as possible scum from you on day one? No hints, no suggestions, no questions. If you did have such inclinations and withheld them from the town that's fairly anti-town behavior. And then there's the much debated quote where early in D2 you noted that caf seemed pro-town. I find it hard to believe you pivoted 180 degrees that quickly from believing caf to be scum, worthy of roleblocking, to appearing pro-town.Empking wrote:Caf was scummy day one. That's not crazy and you're scum for acting like it is.Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:No, you seemingly roleblock based on the alignment of the moons of Jupiter or at least that'd be as logical as whatever convoluted theory you tossed out to us as your reasoning.Empking wrote:This may seem crazy but I don't roleblock based on what you think.Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:I think Empking is scum. I think with as many power roles as we've seen come out that scum has to have a roleblocker. With the knowledge of caf's alignment it becomes even harder to see why he would be blocked by a pro-town roleblocker since the transgressions I voted on primarily occurred on D2. Couple that with his voting history and I'm fairly certain he's scum.Spolium wrote:@DDD: Who do you think are the remaining scum, and why?
.
that is a subjective sentence, that doesn't add anything, and only tries to get suspicion on Empking.mykonian wrote:vote Empking
that is a subjective sentence, that doesn't add anything, and only tries to get suspicion on Spolium.
You think wrong.mykonian wrote:I think I pointed pretty well out, what it is that is scummy and why it is scummy.
If you can't then I worry for you.I can't get it more objective then that.
I stated a fact,. That's better than what you did.so please defend.
I don't think this is a fact. You are just turning something that is not scummy, and pretty normal in this game, because you, wall-e and Spolium were away, into something that is scummy for him.Empking wrote:I think Spoilum lurking is veeery telling.
How is it not a fact. Ib think I should know best about what I think.mykonian wrote:I don't think this is a fact.Empking wrote:I think Spoilum lurking is veeery telling.
What insults?
and thank you for the insults. I love you too. It also doesn't help to move my vote.
it doesn't help you.If you can't then I worry for you.
Sorry, I thought that was obvious that I merely disbelieved you couldn't say something more objective.mykonian wrote:it doesn't help you.If you can't then I worry for you.
What is the scumhunting intent of your posts?mykonian wrote:ok, first point, while I first pointed out that his play resembled the play I saw from him, and voted him for that, his claim seemed good to me, and I stopped thinking about it. Now, after some players I saw as protown stayed alive, and assuming two scum, he must be one of them.
The vote-unvote was a controlled vote to see what would happen. The vote now, is because I can really not see town making that post, he is only trying to shift attention to you, without any scumhunting intent.