Is it?X 699 wrote:And Vi, the Miller without a Cop was just bastardly. Otherwise, really great setup.
Miller
Plus IMO Sane Cop is one of
Is it?X 699 wrote:And Vi, the Miller without a Cop was just bastardly. Otherwise, really great setup.
I actually thought it was a pretty novel idea and was actually balanced. Imagine that cult and balance together at last. It kept me on my toes too because while I was pretty certain (at times) that there was another scum group, I never would have guessed a second cult. Good job.Vi wrote:And that's how the Cult Mentor came about. How do you like it?
That most certainly would have thrown a wrench in my plans. I can understand if cow feels a bit angry at that one. Had you considered that in the setup when you were writing it, Vi?Vi wrote:hascow's failure to block Sotty7's recruitment N1 was borderline mod error, for which I apologize. I hope the reason it went through is clear, if legalistic.
heh. But I <3 you! Seriously though, you have very good instincts Juls, it is just a matter of execution. It didn't help you either that the opposite cult was thinking about your mislynch at the same time. This is twice now you have nailed me as scum, I just happened to come out on top this time. However, be expecting a NK if we ever meet under these circumstances again! I imagine you won't be letting me get away next time.Juls wrote:Did I mention I hate you VP?
I'm sorry. Seriously. I just play to win any way I can (short of searching for modkills on text color). I hope there's no hard feelings.Juls wrote:What sucks is you guys, by the end, had me convinced I was stupid and that was what sucked so bad for me. I hate feeling stupid.
I wouldn't have called it borderline mod error if I was planning for it... I was careless in writing the Role PM.VP Baltar 702 wrote:That most certainly would have thrown a wrench in my plans. I can understand if cow feels a bit angry at that one. Had you considered that in the setup when you were writing it, Vi?Vi wrote:hascow's failure to block Sotty7's recruitment N1 was borderline mod error, for which I apologize. I hope the reason it went through is clear, if legalistic.
I think if you read it again, there's a little more to the vote count flavor than you may have picked up on the first time...VP Baltar 702 wrote:Second, thank you Vi for putting so much effort into the flavor for this game. I really enjoyed reading every bit of it (and also laughing a good bit of the time).
VP Baltar 702 wrote:I just play to win any way I can (short of searching for modkills on text color).
?????????????????????????Vi wrote:hascow's failure to block Sotty7's recruitment N1 was borderline mod error
Your jailing: DOCTORED+ ROLEBLOCKEDhasdgfas 705 wrote:?????????????????????????Vi wrote:hascow's failure to block Sotty7's recruitment N1 was borderline mod error
Why would it be mod error?
I agree. This is being fixed in my future setups.hasdgfas 705 wrote:woah woah, and sotty was able to kill and track same night? Broken, IMO.
I was pretty suspicious of you last night. The time before that, I wasn't really sure who the best choice was.tubby wrote:cow was i jailed because i was that scummy or did you want to protect me??
Thank you. I appreciate that.Sotty wrote:Everything about this game was enjoyable, the setup, the flavor, the players and no huge walls of text. I feel bad about Juls, I know what it feels like to have no one listen to you no matter what you do, still it must give you some comfort that pretty much all of the scum were pushing for your lynch. I would defiantly want to play with you again.
Keeping deadline mechanics secret is just asking for trouble. But I can't think of anything special offhandVP Baltar 712 wrote:Vi, are you keeping the deadline mechanics of your next game secret for now? I'm curious how you will force the same pace without the discussion dependant deadlines.
Unless they're confirmed town, I always want a claimed supersaint lynch, because it's such an easy scum claim, and even lynching them might take a scum with them.elvis_knits wrote:Wow! Congrats to VP and sotty!
I also think X would have had a good chance of winning if it weren't for me! I suggested supersaint, and then gave stupid night actions with my hider role that sort of forced the town to kill him. And I failed so miserably trying to get you guys to lynch me! I thought it would be so easy to get lynched, but I didn't want to LOOK like I wanted to be lynched. Everyone just assumed I had mental problems... lol
Exciting and unpredictable setup, Vi! Battery power was awesome and forced the game to keep moving.
It was misleading, that's all. It didn't bother me really, 'cause I was scum, but it would have if I was town.Vi wrote:Is it?X 699 wrote:And Vi, the Miller without a Cop was just bastardly. Otherwise, really great setup.
Millerimpliesthat there is a Cop, but it doesn't guarantee one.
Plus IMO Sane Cop is one ofthe worstroles in the book. Not to say I won't ever put one in a setup, but etc.
So????Vi wrote:I can answer that after the game is over.X wrote:http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=11725http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=11680Vi wrote:My rulesets force people to unvote and vote in bold because I absolutely consider fakehammers, etc. to be legitimate tactics. There shouldn't be a ban on being clever.While Empking was at L-1 and Juls was voting VP Baltar:Vi wrote:3)Voting:Votes should be in bold in order for them to count, for instance:Vote: freeko. If you wish to vote for a different player, you MUST unvote, also inbold. As long as I can tell who you're voting for, I don't care if you abbreviate someone's name when you vote them.Juls wrote:Maybe you will understand it if I say it in a different colorbut I am going to have this conversation about VP and you and Sotty misrepresenting everything I say because I think it is important for people to see this after since you guys have set up my lynch for tomorrow.I will vote Empking if we get close to deadline...happilyNow, Juls DID bold his vote for Empking. However, he did not unvote. My question is, if he had not been voting, and then posted that quote, would you have counted it as a vote and ended the Day? I realize it wouldn't make much difference even then, because the meter's probably gonna run out in the next two days. But I'm a curious guy. So?
Oh this.X wrote:So????Vi wrote:I can answer that after the game is over.X wrote:http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=11725http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=11680Vi wrote:My rulesets force people to unvote and vote in bold because I absolutely consider fakehammers, etc. to be legitimate tactics. There shouldn't be a ban on being clever.While Empking was at L-1 and Juls was voting VP Baltar:Vi wrote:3)Voting:Votes should be in bold in order for them to count, for instance:Vote: freeko. If you wish to vote for a different player, you MUST unvote, also inbold. As long as I can tell who you're voting for, I don't care if you abbreviate someone's name when you vote them.Juls wrote:Maybe you will understand it if I say it in a different colorbut I am going to have this conversation about VP and you and Sotty misrepresenting everything I say because I think it is important for people to see this after since you guys have set up my lynch for tomorrow.I will vote Empking if we get close to deadline...happilyNow, Juls DID bold his vote for Empking. However, he did not unvote. My question is, if he had not been voting, and then posted that quote, would you have counted it as a vote and ended the Day? I realize it wouldn't make much difference even then, because the meter's probably gonna run out in the next two days. But I'm a curious guy. So?