Page 29 of 110

Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 8:10 am
by BBmolla
This Phil wagon sucks testicles.

Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 8:17 am
by saulres
Phillammon wrote:Looks like I'm toast.


Four votes out of 11 does not a lynch make.

BBmolla wrote:This Phil wagon sucks testicles.


Why? I see two things which make it a good choice:

1) Scummy behavior
2) If claim is true, detrimental to town.

Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 8:24 am
by BBmolla
saulres wrote:1) Scummy behavior

I don't think he's acted scummy at all.

As a note, I expect the mafia to start killing all the active players, leaving us in LYLO with a bunch of lurkers. Tierce is going to yell at me for this(she thinks me wanting to lynch lurkers is a scumtell), but we really should be lynching scum lurkers in the next few days.

Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 8:29 am
by Captain Haddock
BBmolla wrote:Haddock I've already addressed that your "case" is awful.

I wanted to quicklynch because:
A. Modconfirmed scum
B. Didn't want my recruit to have to read eleventeen hundred pages to catch up.

I wasn't rolefishing, I was trying to determine if:
A. The masons were worst because one of them is scum.
B. The masons were worst because they have some side ability that makes them worst.

That's kind of fucking important.

No you ignored it. (Skim from post 600 everyone else)


That's hardly half of my case and doesn't answer what first appeared in it but I will respond.

A. There's no benefit to quicklynching compared to lynching later, and you argued the pros if 2birds was town.
B. Is the most ridiculous excuse I've ever read. Why not quicklynch every game to be nice to replacements :roll:

A and B. They should be read individually and a townie wouldn't want that information till a mass claim.


Fuck it, VOTE: BBmolla

Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 8:29 am
by saulres
Nothing in here to convince you? He's active lurking.

I disagree with Tierce on that comment, BTW. In my experience I've caught several scum lurking. It depends what they're doing elsewhere on site. If they're not doing anything, let them live. If they're posting up a storm elsewhere but not here -- that's always been, for me, a scumtell.

Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:19 am
by Oversoul
Actually... I have a question.

Tierce were you given a worst role PM or a just a generic PM?

BBmolla, you aren't exactly trying to push for another lynch (despite being on my wagon) or at least none that I can see in the last two pages.

Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 10:06 am
by ManiacalLemon
VOTE: Phil
Self explanatory.

Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 10:31 am
by Phillammon
ManiacalLemon wrote:VOTE: Phil
Self explanatory.

No, no it isn't. Don't just sheep or parrot out the party line, what are
your
reasons?

Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 10:56 am
by BBmolla
Captain Haddock wrote:A. There's no benefit to quicklynching compared to lynching later, and you argued the pros if 2birds was town.
B. Is the most ridiculous excuse I've ever read. Why not quicklynch every game to be nice to replacements

A proved that roles are possibly bastard. This is really fucking important.
B, replacements voluntarily join a game, I recruited Tierce, meaning she just got thrown a PM(according to her she wasn't even asked if she wanted to play). Wouldn't you be upset if you got a role PM for a game you didn't sign up for and had to read 30 pages to catch up?

Your arguments are shit Haddock.

Oversoul wanna lynch Haddock with me?

Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 10:56 am
by BBmolla
VOTE: ManiacalLemon

Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 10:56 am
by Amrun
.... why would you do that

Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 10:57 am
by BBmolla
saulres wrote:I disagree with Tierce on that comment, BTW. In my experience I've caught several scum lurking. It depends what they're doing elsewhere on site. If they're not doing anything, let them live. If they're posting up a storm elsewhere but not here -- that's always been, for me, a scumtell.

No, I mean for me personally as a scumtell, not a scumtell in general. Sorry that I didn't make that clear.

In Warlocks and Werewolves I just pushed for a lurker lynch the entire time, and her scumtell on me has spawned from there.

Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 10:57 am
by Phillammon
BBmolla wrote:
Captain Haddock wrote:A. There's no benefit to quicklynching compared to lynching later, and you argued the pros if 2birds was town.
B. Is the most ridiculous excuse I've ever read. Why not quicklynch every game to be nice to replacements

A proved that roles are possibly bastard. This is really fucking important.
B, replacements voluntarily join a game, I recruited Tierce, meaning she just got thrown a PM(according to her she wasn't even asked if she wanted to play). Wouldn't you be upset if you got a role PM for a game you didn't sign up for and had to read 30 pages to catch up?

Your arguments are shit Haddock.

Oversoul wanna lynch Haddock with me?

BBmolla wrote:VOTE: ManiacalLemon


Wait, what?

Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 10:58 am
by BBmolla
ManiacalLemon wrote:VOTE: Phil
Self explanatory.

@Amrun

Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 10:58 am
by Amrun
Why would you vote for ML?

YOU JUST WASTED YOUR VOTE FOR THE WHOLE DAY.

Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 10:58 am
by BBmolla
Oh balls he's the vote magnet.

Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 10:58 am
by BBmolla
I forgot ML was even in this game, let alone his role.

Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 10:59 am
by Phillammon
Ah, right. Yeah. You could have mentioned, mind...


PEdit: Whew, thanks for catching that- I nearly did the same... also, vote magnetism as listed in the original thread is *permanent*, not just for the day...

Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 11:00 am
by BBmolla
ManiacalLemon wrote:Votes will stay on me just for the day.

At least it's not that bastard.

But yeah I fucked up.

Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 11:01 am
by BBmolla
Phil your thoughts on Haddock's case?

Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 11:02 am
by BBmolla
Hey ML can you be more active so scum will actually night kill you

Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 11:04 am
by IceGuy
BBmolla wrote:Oh balls he's the vote magnet.


BBmolla wrote:I forgot ML was even in this game, let alone his role.


What?

Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 11:05 am
by Amrun
BBmolla wrote:Hey ML can you be more active so scum will actually night kill you


Why would scum ever do that?

Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 11:08 am
by Phillammon
On Haddock's case:

Point 1 seems actually pretty good. Pushing a quicklynch is not really justifiable unless it's instant night and the scum appear to be lurking, regardless of how weird the game may be.
Point 2 I've already made my position clear on. He's disregarding what was actually said in favour of subtext. Subtext, I hasten to add, utterly contradicted by said actual wording. I'm willing to take it on face value.
Points 3 and 4 I'm not seeing the real scum implications of. I'm aware that faking a PR is nearly on par for LaL, and I know that your role was hard to crumb, but haddock's case there seems like a bit of an overreaction. I personally still think that Molla is town, but all the same haddock doesn't jump out as me as scum either.

Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 11:09 am
by BBmolla
IceGuy wrote:
BBmolla wrote:Oh balls he's the vote magnet.


BBmolla wrote:I forgot ML was even in this game, let alone his role.


What?

...I don't know how much better I can explain this. I forgot ML was in the game so I forgot he claimed vote magnet.

@Haddock
: What is your read on Oversoul?