Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 9:55 pm
what 'reads' are you seeingIn post 698, StubbsKVM wrote:so you're not giving reads, while giving reads in the quoted posts. Your posts are contradicting.
what 'reads' are you seeingIn post 698, StubbsKVM wrote:so you're not giving reads, while giving reads in the quoted posts. Your posts are contradicting.
and thenbut so far I'm having a town read on Krab more or less
contradicts with:I just thought I could share my thoughts
andI wasn't giving reads myself
I want to work my own reads out of other people's reads instead of spamming reads more than Google is used.
Ouch that sucks. Take your time, don't worry about this game for a week or whatever, anyone who moans at you for low activity during the remainder of this mafia day can suck my balls. Sounds like you'll have plenty of time off work, so don't replace out, you could become useful!In post 655, The Goat wrote:Sorry I've been non-participative. A myriad of minor reasons, not the least of which is...I managed to break my foot.
I'll try to catch up tomorrow. If I can't deal, I'll ask to be replaced.
lol, people calling me terrible is fast becoming my favourite scumtell.In post 656, Zdenek wrote:Oops I misreqd and thought you said that you thought his logic was terrible. Your logic actually is terrible, so I guess I have no problem with him based on this.
haha this seems forced. Forced = unnatural.In post 658, Baby Spice wrote:Original Orc, I really don't get what you mean by saying some of Bro's posts seemed forced.
Please explain.
Interesting voteIn post 666, Serene wrote:Indeed, and in the name of restoring unity and harmony I will:
VOTE: Calcifer
ok that's actually an interesting line.In post 672, Serene wrote:Calcifer actually went along with the bone-headed idea of supplying 4 players for some insane lynch pool.
Then voted a townie.
I want to hang this scummy thing in the temple of all that is sacred.
This is interesting. Anakamius' dram defence next post is also noteworthy.In post 683, Rift Adrift wrote:dramonic meta
Hi nacho. Tell me why my posts ping, and I'll talk to you.In post 689, Calcifer wrote:Rev's postings have been pinging for me in little ways all game. Mastin disagrees, so I'm sitting back and watching him for now.
But yeah, that stinks.
This is better than calcifer imo.
Yeah I noticed that there was a set-up argument on day 1 of the LoL game. I think the Gay II game is probably a better baseline for his town game. Did you look at the other two games? What are your thoughts on them?In post 685, Ankamius wrote:As someone who was in LoL mafia, I'm not really convinced about Dram-meta in that case. Most of his content in that game was more on the setup than actual reads and other things. Honestly, he might have done exactly the same thing he's doing here if LoL mafia didn't start off with something he had strong feelings against.
Yay tablet posting.
elaborate?
Nah wasn't really unsuccessful, your read isn't necessarily right.In post 695, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:And of course you note that I scumread you within like 30 minutes of starting to read up in the game
so
Unsuccessfully, yes.
You've let your scumbuds down
It means that I see other people's reads and work my own reads out of it.In post 696, T S O wrote:"I want to work my own reads out of others." What the hell does this even mean?
Vote: Shadi1337
I genuinely didn't know the term towncred, it was a genuine question it had nothing to do with reactions. And I STILL don't fucking know what you found scummy and you STILL haven't really explained it.In post 697, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:If you were really reaction testing, this was your chance to own up to you. You would've noticed that I was scumreading you. In response, however, you saidIn post 556, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:Why do you think I'm voting you?Yeah bullshit. If you were reaction testing then you would've known what it was that you were doing that I found scummy.I don't know
Granted, I kinda forgot I gave a read on Krab and therefore stated I didn't give any reads so I'm guilty as charged there and contradicted myself. Reason for the read in case anybody cares; He stood out extremely town to me in this game because if you look at the Maestro newbie newbie game he was being quite aggressive while he's more careful and gives more time to his posts and reads.In post 698, StubbsKVM wrote:In post 179, Shadi1337 wrote:Sorry dude, but what are you searching for? A medal? I mean kudos for (perhaps) trying to scum hunt and set some pressure on a few players but other than kicking off the game a bit your reasoning was weak; just rvs for that.In post 176, ProHawk wrote:For the record, I hate all of you that have nothing to say but criticism. It's honestly not all that dumb, but I do suppose change is hard for the simple minded. Regardless it has served its purpose regardless of whether or not you agreed with the idea or not.
VOTE: Shadi
From him I get the shielded scum-vibe.
The simple minded would let it go and think it meant nothing, smart people question the purpose of a lot and criticise stuff rather than going along blind-folded.
What do you mean with shielding scum-vibe, and once you have explained it tell me which posts you see this in or which part of them.
I think (not sure) what was meant is that Orc posted unlike many others, but not a lot. Just a shoot in the dark though. It does indeed seem a bit off, but so far I'm having a town read on Krab more or less; unlike the one I had in newbie newbie by Maestro with him. Then again he's a split personality this time.In post 177, Mac wrote: Krab person (cabd?) - why did you feel the need to seperate orc for not having enough posts from everyone else who don't have enough posts? I found this kinda bizarre behaviour.In post 306, Shadi1337 wrote:As for the part, fair point. I'm not going to argue against it. I just thought I could share my thoughts about it while /maybe/ answering his question. inb4 this post is also very scummyIn post 305, Baby Spice wrote:The last.
You answered a question directed at someone else. It could even be said that you defended someone whom you could not possible have a town read on from a question directed at someone else.
I can even see you leaving the vote in there as an attempt to direct the attention of others away from you question to me.
"Look I'm just asking a question, she's voting someone else"
As for the second part, welp wasn't the intention but whatever; I genuinely just... left it.so you're not giving reads, while giving reads in the quoted posts. Your posts are contradicting.In post 692, Shadi1337 wrote:Finally someone jumped onto the fact that I wasn't giving reads myself, shame it had to be one I personally read scum.In post 686, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:Can you stop being so freaking obvscumIn post 674, Shadi1337 wrote:Can you guys tell the reasons for your 3-4 strongest reads?
Like you are pressuring people about their reads in this shitty general manner that does nothing but try (unsuccessfully) to look like you are doing something, while having basically /no reads of your own/.
Unsuccessfully? It worked fine up until now; and I want to work my own reads out of other people's reads instead of spamming reads more than Google is used.
If you want reads so badly then ask for them, give names preferably I cannot be bothered with a full reads list.
Also, your ISO strikes me as very defensive.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Shadi
Fair do's.
Ask for a name.In post 700, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:what 'reads' are you seeingIn post 698, StubbsKVM wrote:so you're not giving reads, while giving reads in the quoted posts. Your posts are contradicting.
True, as I said earlier I forgot I gave a read on him. Guilty as charged if you really wanna keep jumping on that fact be my guest.In post 701, StubbsKVM wrote:and thenbut so far I'm having a town read on Krab more or less
contradicts with:I just thought I could share my thoughts
andI wasn't giving reads myself
I want to work my own reads out of other people's reads instead of spamming reads more than Google is used.
What aspects of his play look scummy to you? Right now, what I have is some free-floating unease.In post 708, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:Might be a hydra effect but I think this is nacho's scum game
And you know how I read hydras
And you're gonna realise you're that retarded if I get lynched.In post 712, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:just trust me here
shadi is so scum i can't be bothered to build a full case on him, my strongest scumread
he'sthatscum.
Pedit: 13, not talking to me, mostly throwing out reads with limited (imo) interaction, at least different from the other games we've played, and 689
I just want to point out that playing as a hydra tends to make it more difficult to play aggressively, if what you mean by aggressive play is being proactive, putting timely votes down, etc. It's not impossible, and it gets easier with more games played as partners. The timing of synch-ups and in-hydra discussions affects the timing of decisive in-thread activities.In post 709, Shadi1337 wrote:Granted, I kinda forgot I gave a read on Krab and therefore stated I didn't give any reads so I'm guilty as charged there and contradicted myself. Reason for the read in case anybody cares; He stood out extremely town to me in this game because if you look at the Maestro newbie newbie game he was being quite aggressive while he's more careful and gives more time to his posts and reads.
Defence is a decent weapon, but I seem to have used it wrong.
Your vote is bad and you should feel bad.In post 715, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:appeal to fear
except i'm a cocky bitch
try a different route
No, he attacked a lot of players for small stuff and was much more eager to get wagons going.In post 716, Rift Adrift wrote:I just want to point out that playing as a hydra tends to make it more difficult to play aggressively, if what you mean by aggressive play is being proactive, putting timely votes down, etc. It's not impossible, and it gets easier with more games played as partners. The timing of synch-ups and in-hydra discussions affects the timing of decisive in-thread activities.In post 709, Shadi1337 wrote:Granted, I kinda forgot I gave a read on Krab and therefore stated I didn't give any reads so I'm guilty as charged there and contradicted myself. Reason for the read in case anybody cares; He stood out extremely town to me in this game because if you look at the Maestro newbie newbie game he was being quite aggressive while he's more careful and gives more time to his posts and reads.
Defence is a decent weapon, but I seem to have used it wrong.
In post 683, Rift Adrift wrote:League of Legends game: http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=26305 (sorry can't get an iso link to work). dramonic was town. The difference in content and seriousness between this game and that one is pretty dramatic. Nacho played that game, so I'd like to hear his thoughts.In post 670, Rift Adrift wrote:My opinion of policy lynches hasn't changed much.In post 659, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:I dunno if TIP is scum or not
I want to policy lynch dramonic, not TIP. Talk to me about that fery.
I have zero experiential meta on dramonic. What about you?
I haven't done a meta dive yet. Will find some time for one tonight.
Gay Mafia II game: http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=4531749. dramonic was town in this game, too. A little more goofiness than the League of Legends game, but it looks like more content than this game.
Experimental Role Mafia: http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=56&t=21773. paydirt, I think. dramonic was scum.
gonna have a talk with Syryana.
A slight bit, but your post above firms up our read on him, of the 3 games linked above he seems even less contributing even less in this game than experimental role mafia that he was scum in. The other two games read as "different" play to us, other head will be getting with me to evaluate feeling on this, but we've been in and out of touch for different reasons, none the least of which is time zones. Currently our vote on him stands as at least this half of the brain thinks the meta only solidifies the read.In post 684, Rift Adrift wrote:Cabd, did you do meta research on dramonic for this game?
In post 709, Shadi1337 wrote:Nah wasn't really unsuccessful, your read isn't necessarily right.In post 695, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:And of course you note that I scumread you within like 30 minutes of starting to read up in the game
so
Unsuccessfully, yes.
You've let your scumbuds down
It means that I see other people's reads and work my own reads out of it.In post 696, T S O wrote:"I want to work my own reads out of others." What the hell does this even mean?
Vote: Shadi1337
e.g a group of people could jump on someone who I see town, so I could see that group of people or some in it as scum.
I genuinely didn't know the term towncred, it was a genuine question it had nothing to do with reactions. And I STILL don't fucking know what you found scummy and you STILL haven't really explained it.In post 697, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:If you were really reaction testing, this was your chance to own up to you. You would've noticed that I was scumreading you. In response, however, you saidIn post 556, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:Why do you think I'm voting you?Yeah bullshit. If you were reaction testing then you would've known what it was that you were doing that I found scummy.I don't know
Granted, I kinda forgot I gave a read on Krab and therefore stated I didn't give any reads so I'm guilty as charged there and contradicted myself. Reason for the read in case anybody cares; He stood out extremely town to me in this game because if you look at the Maestro newbie newbie game he was being quite aggressive while he's more careful and gives more time to his posts and reads.In post 698, StubbsKVM wrote:In post 179, Shadi1337 wrote:Sorry dude, but what are you searching for? A medal? I mean kudos for (perhaps) trying to scum hunt and set some pressure on a few players but other than kicking off the game a bit your reasoning was weak; just rvs for that.In post 176, ProHawk wrote:For the record, I hate all of you that have nothing to say but criticism. It's honestly not all that dumb, but I do suppose change is hard for the simple minded. Regardless it has served its purpose regardless of whether or not you agreed with the idea or not.
VOTE: Shadi
From him I get the shielded scum-vibe.
The simple minded would let it go and think it meant nothing, smart people question the purpose of a lot and criticise stuff rather than going along blind-folded.
What do you mean with shielding scum-vibe, and once you have explained it tell me which posts you see this in or which part of them.
I think (not sure) what was meant is that Orc posted unlike many others, but not a lot. Just a shoot in the dark though. It does indeed seem a bit off, but so far I'm having a town read on Krab more or less; unlike the one I had in newbie newbie by Maestro with him. Then again he's a split personality this time.In post 177, Mac wrote: Krab person (cabd?) - why did you feel the need to seperate orc for not having enough posts from everyone else who don't have enough posts? I found this kinda bizarre behaviour.In post 306, Shadi1337 wrote:As for the part, fair point. I'm not going to argue against it. I just thought I could share my thoughts about it while /maybe/ answering his question. inb4 this post is also very scummyIn post 305, Baby Spice wrote:The last.
You answered a question directed at someone else. It could even be said that you defended someone whom you could not possible have a town read on from a question directed at someone else.
I can even see you leaving the vote in there as an attempt to direct the attention of others away from you question to me.
"Look I'm just asking a question, she's voting someone else"
As for the second part, welp wasn't the intention but whatever; I genuinely just... left it.so you're not giving reads, while giving reads in the quoted posts. Your posts are contradicting.In post 692, Shadi1337 wrote:Finally someone jumped onto the fact that I wasn't giving reads myself, shame it had to be one I personally read scum.In post 686, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:Can you stop being so freaking obvscumIn post 674, Shadi1337 wrote:Can you guys tell the reasons for your 3-4 strongest reads?
Like you are pressuring people about their reads in this shitty general manner that does nothing but try (unsuccessfully) to look like you are doing something, while having basically /no reads of your own/.
Unsuccessfully? It worked fine up until now; and I want to work my own reads out of other people's reads instead of spamming reads more than Google is used.
If you want reads so badly then ask for them, give names preferably I cannot be bothered with a full reads list.
Also, your ISO strikes me as very defensive.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Shadi
Defence is a decent weapon, but I seem to have used it wrong.
Fair do's.
Ask for a name.In post 700, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:what 'reads' are you seeingIn post 698, StubbsKVM wrote:so you're not giving reads, while giving reads in the quoted posts. Your posts are contradicting.
True, as I said earlier I forgot I gave a read on him. Guilty as charged if you really wanna keep jumping on that fact be my guest.In post 701, StubbsKVM wrote:and thenbut so far I'm having a town read on Krab more or less
contradicts with:I just thought I could share my thoughts
andI wasn't giving reads myself
I want to work my own reads out of other people's reads instead of spamming reads more than Google is used.
You give a "more or less" townreadGranted, I kinda forgot I gave a read on Krab and therefore stated I didn't give any reads so I'm guilty as charged there and contradicted myself. Reason for the read in case anybody cares; He stood out extremely town to me in this game because if you look at the Maestro newbie newbie game he was being quite aggressive while he's more careful and gives more time to his posts and reads.