Page 29 of 33
Posted: Mon Jul 22, 2013 6:26 am
by fferyllt
I've called you out for it before. Someone FoSes you for something. You turn that exact FoS back on them. Someone tunnels you. You tunnel them for the same reasons they give for tunneling you. I've seen you do it as scum and as town. But, you mostly stopped doing it during/after the Popcorn game.
Now it's back. And I wonder why.
Posted: Mon Jul 22, 2013 6:30 am
by Grimgroove
What do you make of Cheery Dog's refusal to claim?
Posted: Mon Jul 22, 2013 6:30 am
by Grimgroove
And you fferyllt?
Posted: Mon Jul 22, 2013 6:34 am
by fferyllt
I'd kinda like for TiP to answer this before I do.
Posted: Mon Jul 22, 2013 6:39 am
by TheIrishPope
@fferyllt, according to you, it's not important because it's not indicative of my alignment. Move on.
@Grimgroove, his refusal to claim means nothing. I understand him. He will be mislynched and he does not feel the need to claim, because it will not stop the lynch. A claim only delays the inevitable.
Posted: Mon Jul 22, 2013 6:42 am
by Grimgroove
In post 704, TheIrishPope wrote:
@Grimgroove, his refusal to claim means nothing. I understand him. He will be mislynched and he does not feel the need to claim, because it will not stop the lynch. A claim only delays the inevitable.
If it will not stop the lynch, not claiming means more of a delay than claiming does.
I'd say it's quite controversial not to claim at this stage. I see no town-motive for "not feeling the need to claim". If he's bitter because he's being suspected he should get over it now and get his act together.
What makes you so sure it will be a mislynch?
Posted: Mon Jul 22, 2013 6:49 am
by fferyllt
In post 704, TheIrishPope wrote:@fferyllt, according to you, it's not important because it's not indicative of my alignment. Move on.
@Grimgroove, his refusal to claim means nothing. I understand him. He will be mislynched and he does not feel the need to claim, because it will not stop the lynch. A claim only delays the inevitable.
It WASN'T indicative of your alignment then. It showing back up after you had stopped doing it for a while could be significant. It certainly pinged to me last night.
Posted: Mon Jul 22, 2013 6:53 am
by TheIrishPope
@Grimgroove, I have a townread on him.
@fferyllt, how does this concern me?
Posted: Mon Jul 22, 2013 6:54 am
by fferyllt
Two things bother me a little about it. The longer the day continues the more associative tells will potentially make it into the thread. If he's scum, I think closing this day out would make sense, and delaying is not optimal scum play unless he thinks the wagon could shift again. I can also see the stubborn insistence that jason answer his question coming from a town perspective.
Posted: Mon Jul 22, 2013 6:55 am
by fferyllt
It doesn't, unless my getting a scum vibe from that post is a concern to you.
Posted: Mon Jul 22, 2013 6:59 am
by TheIrishPope
It is not. Why did you feel the need to mention that?
Posted: Mon Jul 22, 2013 7:02 am
by fferyllt
Posted: Mon Jul 22, 2013 7:08 am
by TheIrishPope
Hrm...
ISOing you, if it makes you feel better.
Posted: Mon Jul 22, 2013 8:56 pm
by Grimgroove
In post 708, fferyllt wrote:
Two things bother me a little about it. The longer the day continues the more associative tells will potentially make it into the thread.
Not in the state this game is currently in.
Posted: Tue Jul 23, 2013 12:07 pm
by Lynx_Shine
Show me where I said you were scum. Ffery sent some accusations over a previous game. I find you frustrating and fairly annoying so far but on a game level I'm betting you're Town. Personal differences aside, whether or not we're going to get along has nothing to do with my reading you.
In post 708, fferyllt wrote:Two things bother me a little about it. The longer the day continues the more associative tells will potentially make it into the thread. If he's scum, I think closing this day out would make sense, and delaying is not optimal scum play unless he thinks the wagon could shift again. I can also see the stubborn insistence that jason answer his question coming from a town perspective.
He's been trying to flip the wagon onto Jason for awhile, I read this as Scum picking one person to try to sacrifice to buy themselves a day (fairly common where I came from, became a reliable scumtell). Up until recently, it was primarily anti-Jason and accusations of sheeping grimgroove. He hasn't responded to many things until several others claimed ready to hammer, and the game was basically coasting before that. "I won't respond because I just won't" is working well as a way to drag out the Day; until a few days ago, it was primarily a back and forth of "Cheery answer" "no you answer" so there was no real Town discussion to benefit from.
Posted: Tue Jul 23, 2013 12:20 pm
by TheIrishPope
Huh. You find me frustrating because I'm trying to win the game. Interesting.
Posted: Tue Jul 23, 2013 12:27 pm
by fferyllt
In post 714, Lynx_Shine wrote:
Show me where I said you were scum. Ffery sent some accusations over a previous game. I find you frustrating and fairly annoying so far but on a game level I'm betting you're Town. Personal differences aside, whether or not we're going to get along has nothing to do with my reading you.
In post 708, fferyllt wrote:Two things bother me a little about it. The longer the day continues the more associative tells will potentially make it into the thread. If he's scum, I think closing this day out would make sense, and delaying is not optimal scum play unless he thinks the wagon could shift again. I can also see the stubborn insistence that jason answer his question coming from a town perspective.
He's been trying to flip the wagon onto Jason for awhile, I read this as Scum picking one person to try to sacrifice to buy themselves a day (fairly common where I came from, became a reliable scumtell). Up until recently, it was primarily anti-Jason and accusations of sheeping grimgroove. He hasn't responded to many things until several others claimed ready to hammer, and the game was basically coasting before that. "I won't respond because I just won't" is working well as a way to drag out the Day; until a few days ago, it was primarily a back and forth of "Cheery answer" "no you answer" so there was no real Town discussion to benefit from.
This is all true, but if he is scum, there is probably something in the game thread, including day 2, to point to his partner. In a large game scum can lay down all sorts of false trails of association. In a small game it's not that easy.
Anyway.
I feel like day 2 is pretty much squeezed dry.
Posted: Tue Jul 23, 2013 3:30 pm
by TheIrishPope
Pretty much confirms me as Town.
Posted: Tue Jul 23, 2013 4:30 pm
by Lynx_Shine
I agree with ffery, let's get this moving to Day 3. Called intent, no claim or other viable suspects, so we're at an impasse until something happens.
VOTE: CheeryDog
Posted: Tue Jul 23, 2013 5:20 pm
by Nobody Special
Votecount 2.10
Cheery Dog - 4 - fferyllt, Grimgroove, JasonWazza, Lynx_Shine
fferyllt - 1 - TheIrishPope
JasonWazza - 1 - Cheery Dog
Not Voting: TheTrollie
With 7 it takes 4 to lynch
Deadline is in (expired on 2013-07-29 19:50:21)
Posted: Tue Jul 23, 2013 5:25 pm
by Nobody Special
Cheery Dog, Vanilla Townie,
has been lynched.
Night Two begins now. All night actions are due by PM to both RachMarie and myself by deadline.
Deadline: (expired on 2013-07-27 00:25:29)
Posted: Sat Jul 27, 2013 12:12 am
by RachMarie
It is a bright sunny morning in River City, and as you trudge up the hill to the conference room, you realize someone is missing.....
Where is Grim?? You were sure he was right behind you, but no... As you move into the courtyard, you finally find him, lying on his back and his eyes wide open and surprise on his face... and a bullet wound in his chest. Murder most foul has once again happened. Who did it?
Grimgroove
Vanilla Townie
was killed on Night 2
With 5 it takes 3 to lynch
Deadline is in (expired on 2013-08-10 07:12:12)
Posted: Sat Jul 27, 2013 12:28 am
by JasonWazza
Ok so this is LYLO so no votes should be placed without consideration (any vote from town onto town can cause a quicklynch from scum)
FF, what's your say on the current scope of things.
Posted: Sat Jul 27, 2013 3:39 am
by fferyllt
ugh.
My first thought was that it's time for the remaining PR to claim, but second thought is no. If we get the lynch right they can do their thing on night 3.
Posted: Sat Jul 27, 2013 3:53 am
by JasonWazza
Doctor/BP, so no claims.
Also FF i was more asking for who you think was scum.