In post 677, Sakura Hana wrote:Basically, i'd rather let Cabd sort this kind of thing out considering he has more experience in being with ffery on hydra as scum.
If ffery has suddenly chosen to cast off every single fucking lesson I've taught her about being scum over our multiple morph scumgames AND our nightly google talk chats, then sure, she can be scum. Not to mention I specifically mentioned her hiding behidn the other head as a scumtell in the thread earlier. You think ffery scum sees that and goes "Well i'll be damned, better do exactly what cabd just said is a scumtell for me" ?
Is it just me or is this WIFOM tho
Pedit: VOTE: Mc MaracaVOTE: Mc MaracaVOTE: Mc MaracaVOTE: Mc MaracaVOTE: Mc MaracaVOTE: Mc MaracaVOTE: Mc MaracaVOTE: Mc MaracaVOTE: Mc Maraca
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 12:45 pm
by Angry Frat BROs
Glad to know you've resolved to being loud and useless this game Orci.
Good to know, are you planning on doing anything else?
In post 405, Guyett wrote:Caled could well be scum... I'll have to reread lucid dreamers
Why that game?
In post 431, Guyett wrote:Ok I've done a quick read of Lucid dreamers, its my only game with Caled which I remember and she was scum in it.
She lurked pretty hard through that game too
VOTE: Caled
Have you seen a Caled's town game?
On that note what are your thoughts on the other lurkers like Hermy, Jacob and yesiree?
In post 432, TheIrishPope wrote:Guyett could you shut the fuck up for a moment because you're being a hypocrite
In post 434, Guyett wrote:Pretty much all of her posts have been excuses or prod dodges
I agree with TIP on this
Unvote
Vote: Guyett
In post 441, Guyett wrote:Sakura Hana - Scum. I've gone over this before. fluff, game theory.. fucking around with hydra spec. disappearing as soon as some votes rack up (See PV in Marvel vs Dc)
If you really thought I was scum because of that you'd have checked that I had dissapeared site-wide for the weekend.
Oh wait, you're after a mislynch anyways.
On that note if Guyett's scum then Caled's most likely town.
Sakura is voting Guyett because...
a) He wasn't observant about your VLA ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
b) He's useless, along with 50% of this game ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
c) selectively calling out one lurker and not others, which he's not close to the only one to have done ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
d) She can use the assumption that he's scum to make him look like scum ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
e) "hypocrisy" (dunno what this is referring to but it is the only legitimate reason)
In post 647, sangres wrote:Feeling pretty cautious is independent of your not hitting either extreme. I think I said earlier that I'm counting on nacho to keep me reality-based on my Cabd read. You're pretty much in the same category.
Eh I can buy this. I know in both our other games you thought I was scummy but didn't know what to do about me.
UNVOTE: ; VOTE: Guyett
AFB are voting Guyett because... literally no apparent reason? They've mentioned him a couple times but not in a 'this is my top scumread' way.
So, what gives, guys? I don't understand why this wagon exists, and he doesn't seem particularly worse to me than, say, JacobSavage.
I often do. Speaking of sucking, a case wont make your vote suck less.
Guyett is a silly vote.
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 12:56 pm
by MC Maraca
Hey ceph let's fakeclaim masons and start a savage counterwagon of justice. Oh wait, I'm already here. Get with the program man.
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 12:58 pm
by Doctor Jekyll
Upon ISOing, I would classify Guyett as a light scumread, but I still don't understand why he's getting so many votes.
Pedits:
@orci: Uh you know you were just doing it right
@Cabd: I only fakeclaim masons with slots I'm sure about
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 12:58 pm
by orcinus_theoriginal
VOTE: Jacobsavage
ok
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 12:59 pm
by orcinus_theoriginal
In post 710, Doctor Jekyll wrote:Upon ISOing, I would classify Guyett as a light scumread, but I still don't understand why he's getting so many votes.
Pedits:
@orci: Uh you know you were just doing it right
@Cabd: I only fakeclaim masons with slots I'm sure about
???
Doing what
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 12:59 pm
by sangres
In post 694, MC Maraca wrote:Sup. I'm around. I see some quesitons for me, hang on.
I was wondering if you could consult that binder and tell me if this might be Guyett gambiting. Or if he's gotten pissed about being run up and joined his wagon before.
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 1:00 pm
by Doctor Jekyll
Guyett is too easy, I don't like how this wagon materialized in the absence of a case, and this vote is indubitably superior. Sadly our principled-letting-our-vote-rot-on-RC has not picked up enough support.
VOTE: JacobSavage
-Hyde
@orci: voting guyett
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 1:01 pm
by goodmorning
man this is a lot of votecounts
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 1:01 pm
by Doctor Jekyll
Guyett's ATE is mediocre. In fact, his own actions don't really have anything to do with my desire to not lynch him.
-Hyde
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 1:03 pm
by Angry Frat BROs
In post 707, Doctor Jekyll wrote:AFB are voting Guyett because... literally no apparent reason? They've mentioned him a couple times but not in a 'this is my top scumread' way.
So, what gives, guys? I don't understand why this wagon exists, and he doesn't seem particularly worse to me than, say, JacobSavage.
Its possible I forgot to trasnlate my thoughts into a post.
He is doing things I tend to do as scum. His selfvote was not encourging and him bothering to point out he was at L - 2 w/o unvoting is just scum trying not to look like they are flailing. Him "trawling for reactions" it and ending up on ffery shows he was just lookingfor a "valid" excuse to move his vote. His attempts at scumhunting are uninspired and his rage reads fake to me.
His earlier posts to me were cutesy in a scum way, sort of pointed but not really doing anything. Trying to blend in, no real attempts to find scum (except highly contrived and immediate ffery case out of the blue, making them a plausible buddy).
In particular, him pointing out we have no completed games together rang alarm bells. I attempt to discredit meta reads on me when Im scum like that. He is totally not considering the possibility that I have read games of his and instead tries to handwave my suspicion away without following up on it or figuring out if it has a base to it? Thats scum.
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 1:04 pm
by MC Maraca
oh, you're voting us
I take back that excited greeting
Pedit: jesus christ
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 1:08 pm
by Guyett
could someone explain the jacob case?
Coz I've lynched him for being a useless lurksack and he flipped town and I was sad
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 1:09 pm
by orcinus_theoriginal
You realize that I RVS voted Guyett because he was online at the time and apparently there were votes on him, and unvoted immediately after i saw the buildup to his L-2?
Just making sure
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 1:10 pm
by Angry Frat BROs
In post 707, Doctor Jekyll wrote:So, what gives, guys? I don't understand why this wagon exists, and he doesn't seem particularly worse to me than, say, JacobSavage.
Im sure JS is a strong scumread of yours. Lets hear why hes better than lynching Guyett.
Cause this counterwagon on JS is looking awfully suspicious to me after Guyett offers up some ez fakeable AtE.
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 1:12 pm
by Guyett
In post 720, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:You realize that I RVS voted Guyett because he was online at the time and apparently there were votes on him, and unvoted immediately after i saw the buildup to his L-2?
Just making sure
Immediately? Like 3 posts after the VC that had me at L-2...
Why are you so afraid to lynch me? Have some fucking conviction man
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 1:13 pm
by sangres
In post 720, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:You realize that I RVS voted Guyett because he was online at the time and apparently there were votes on him, and unvoted immediately after i saw the buildup to his L-2?
In post 707, Doctor Jekyll wrote:AFB are voting Guyett because... literally no apparent reason? They've mentioned him a couple times but not in a 'this is my top scumread' way.
So, what gives, guys? I don't understand why this wagon exists, and he doesn't seem particularly worse to me than, say, JacobSavage.
Its possible I forgot to trasnlate my thoughts into a post.
He is doing things I tend to do as scum. His selfvote was not encourging and him bothering to point out he was at L - 2 w/o unvoting is just scum trying not to look like they are flailing. Him "trawling for reactions" it and ending up on ffery shows he was just lookingfor a "valid" excuse to move his vote. His attempts at scumhunting are uninspired and his rage reads fake to me.
His ISO screams discouraged town
His earlier posts to me were cutesy in a scum way, sort of pointed but not really doing anything. Trying to blend in, no real attempts to find scum (except highly contrived and immediate ffery case out of the blue, making them a plausible buddy).
I dont' see him trying to blend in. I see him with posts like "I haven't been able to get into this game".
In particular, him pointing out we have no completed games together rang alarm bells. I attempt to discredit meta reads on me when Im scum like that. He is totally not considering the possibility that I have read games of his and instead tries to handwave my suspicion away without following up on it or figuring out if it has a base to it? Thats scum.
