↑Kop wrote:In other news, a Vigilante claim would give me peace of mind that we're not facing an SK but I'm not sure my peace of mind is worth having the role in the open, especially if it has another shot. Use your own judgement.
I doubt SK would claim, since there easily could be an investigative role to confirm whether he is SK or vigi. I support vigi claiming tomorrow. (Also I think the nos kill was pretty pro-town, so odds balance in town's favor).
↑Aquanim wrote:...That made more sense in my head.
The point being that I think the large majority of players have an inflated opinion of their own play. Likely including myself.
In other news, a Vigilante claim would give me peace of mind that we're not facing an SK but I'm not sure my peace of mind is worth having the role in the open, especially if it has another shot. Use your own judgement.
I can half see what your saying about the SK, but bringing out the Vigilante role out in the open uneases me, and if the vigilante comes forward, how can we prove that he is the vigilante and not a SK?
Titus, will understand the stance of what happened with that, in the first blitz game.
We find the last scum, we lynch the last scum, if the game doesn't end we lynch the vig claim.
Assuming it's a vigilante, I think the best thing is to leave it to their judgement when to claim based on whatever their thread position is.
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 1:31 am
by Aquanim
↑hi im Yakko wrote:Can we lynch aqua? He makes my headache.
I apologise.
Seriously: I don't really understand where Pisskop is coming from either. I'd like that explained a little more.
↑Kop wrote:In other news, a Vigilante claim would give me peace of mind that we're not facing an SK but I'm not sure my peace of mind is worth having the role in the open, especially if it has another shot. Use your own judgement.
I doubt SK would claim, since there easily could be an investigative role to confirm whether he is SK or vigi. I support vigi claiming tomorrow. (Also I think the nos kill was pretty pro-town, so odds balance in town's favor).
It was pro town I agree, but if there was a SK out there, he's shooting anything that could be a threat to him, or her. I don't think they care what they hit to be honest. The SK could use that to strengthen there case for town.
↑hi im Yakko wrote:Can we lynch aqua? He makes my headache.
I apologise.
Seriously: I don't really understand where Pisskop is coming from either. I'd like that explained a little more.
It is probably because you're scum.
Don't make me hate you.
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 2:31 am
by hi im Yakko
You don't think aqua is being shady?
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 2:47 am
by farside22
↑hi im Yakko wrote:You don't think aqua is being shady?
There is a lot of words I would use to describe Aqua and his claim. Shady is not one of them.
The other words would be less kind.
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 3:09 am
by hi im Yakko
Currently I am trying to decide if Nos was telling the truth in 483
It is interesting to me for farside to just accept an aqua is town game considering everything last day phase. It makes me think impossible thoughts.
Also aqua are you emulating someone? You read like a couple different people posting to me.
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 3:23 am
by itlepip
Aqua, could you please explain at the time your reasoning for claiming bodyguard there was? I don't see any scum reasons for doing it, but I also don't see any town reasons for doing it so I'm still really confused by it.
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 4:02 am
by Nosferatu
lol
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 4:49 am
by KittyMo
Deadline is at (expired on 2015-11-21 21:30:00).
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 4:55 am
by pisskop
Aqui, you are aware theres a player names Kop as well as pisskop?
↑farside22 wrote:While I'm thinking I wrote a note in the pt about pisskop.
I thought he read a bit pissy when he was telling loha about self hammering.
↑pisskop wrote:So can mod modkill him for playing against his wincon and not selfvoting?
Usually town would be using the time to work things out in the game.
I sort of half wondered if both scums were on the loha wagon at the time
and are you suggesting I would, in addition to throwing him under the bus and pinning him there, i would then publicly state he shoud kill himself instead of doing that in the pt?
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 4:59 am
by pisskop
Far, are there more than 2 masons in your pt or just you 2?
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 5:02 am
by pisskop
with 13p in a normal i feel dumb for that.
no cc, shes town.
Aqui
farside
itle
Id like to see a wagon on titus or soren mostly
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 5:09 am
by itlepip
↑pisskop wrote:with 13p in a normal i feel dumb for that.
no cc, shes town.
Aqui
farside
itle
Id like to see a wagon on titus or soren mostly
What is this post trying to say.
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 5:11 am
by pisskop
its saying stop harassing me before i visit you tonight
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 5:29 am
by Titus
UNVOTE: Farside
This is a blitz game. Scum are not likely to fake connections. Masons register as false positives to my method of scumhunting frequently. Both have easy townreads with no explanation and start ahead of town. I look at thought patterns, abberations, survival tendencies, and logic gaps. Masons have that as you start with knowledge the rest of us lack.
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 5:35 am
by Titus
Back to my original reads.
VOTE: Aqua
You're going to explain your wagon attempts better than lol. You're going to explain why you trued to counter wagon me rather than just outright CCing so close to deadline.
There's also the bonus you're in the middle on wagons that aren't scum wagons.
Lol = Policy lynch.
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 5:37 am
by farside22
↑hi im Yakko wrote:Currently I am trying to decide if Nos was telling the truth in 483
It is interesting to me for farside to just accept an aqua is town game considering everything last day phase. It makes me think impossible thoughts.
Also aqua are you emulating someone? You read like a couple different people posting to me.
This is really simple to me.
But we can talk more about this post game if you want.
↑pisskop wrote:Aqui, you are aware theres a player names Kop as well as pisskop?
↑farside22 wrote:While I'm thinking I wrote a note in the pt about pisskop.
I thought he read a bit pissy when he was telling loha about self hammering.
↑pisskop wrote:So can mod modkill him for playing against his wincon and not selfvoting?
Usually town would be using the time to work things out in the game.
I sort of half wondered if both scums were on the loha wagon at the time
and are you suggesting I would, in addition to throwing him under the bus and pinning him there, i would then publicly state he shoud kill himself instead of doing that in the pt?
↑pisskop wrote:with 13p in a normal i feel dumb for that.
no cc, shes town.
Aqui
farside
itle
Id like to see a wagon on titus or soren mostly
I know you can get emotional but I'm leaning Soren as scum at this point.
Vote him with me.
You're going to explain your wagon attempts better than lol. You're going to explain why you trued to counter wagon me rather than just outright CCing so close to deadline.
There's also the bonus you're in the middle on wagons that aren't scum wagons.
Lol = Policy lynch.
Ok you get to awnser my question little girl.
What is the point of claiming bg after?
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 5:42 am
by pisskop
VOTE: titus
no. masons do not turn up guilty to your methods. you arent dumb or bad, and i dont buy bullshit at the store so im not buyimg it here
You're going to explain your wagon attempts better than lol. You're going to explain why you trued to counter wagon me rather than just outright CCing so close to deadline.
There's also the bonus you're in the middle on wagons that aren't scum wagons.
Lol = Policy lynch.
Ok you get to awnser my question little girl.
What is the point of claiming bg after?
Save himself from a Titus tunnel + avoiding any vig shot that may exist