Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2016 3:00 pm
I wasntIn post 649, Dwlee99 wrote:I dont think atm was lying about not knowing how to vote that game.
I wasntIn post 649, Dwlee99 wrote:I dont think atm was lying about not knowing how to vote that game.
I'm not worried about how my actions are perceived.In post 707, Smithereens wrote:That thought process: [found one scum, move on, find another] doesn't actually occur to townies too often I realise. The fact that multiple players are expressing confusion over your vote should alert you to this fact.
Reason. A player who is uninformed is likely to stick to a person who they've discovered is scum with a high degree of confidence. Moving off it simply shows how little profundity the discovery actually made on the player. If Rob's town, then he isn't too concerned about the town win con, and he clearly shows it. Otherwise he's scum.In post 709, Infinity 324 wrote:Do you have a reason you think it's more likely to come from scum or is it just experience
In post 711, Smithereens wrote:Reason. A player who is uninformed is likely to stick to a person who they've discovered is scum with a high degree of confidence. Moving off it simply shows how little profundity the discovery actually made on the player. If Rob's town, then he isn't too concerned about the town win con, and he clearly shows it. Otherwise he's scum.
And why's that?
I doubt it too. But I still disagree that he's "very different"In post 689, Derek12 wrote:You said you read parts of Newbie 1715 right? I skimmed it for fun a bit before this game started, and it makes me highly doubt this.In post 688, Robbnva wrote:What if he is an average player and he's just very manipulative?In post 684, Creature wrote:Surely, if they were an average player I would push him harder, but compared to Newbie 1715, he looks very different.
Confirmation bias cannot be beaten, end of story. Townies should be showing all the flaws that an uninformed player should exhibit, including over confidence in a read that they believe confirms the guilt of another player. You however dropped this tangible and highly convincing case against Creature in favour of poking a far less suspicious player for a reason that I've already demonstrated is absolutely not AI.In post 712, Robbnva wrote:In post 711, Smithereens wrote:Reason. A player who is uninformed is likely to stick to a person who they've discovered is scum with a high degree of confidence. Moving off it simply shows how little profundity the discovery actually made on the player. If Rob's town, then he isn't too concerned about the town win con, and he clearly shows it. Otherwise he's scum.![]()
you are just talking out of your ass at this point.
like this part right here can no way come from a rational thinking townie.In post 711, Smithereens wrote:If Rob's town, then he isn't too concerned about the town win con, and he clearly shows it. Otherwise he's scum.
You're diverting attention from a scum lynch, the affiliation of Crab is actually irrelevant to this matter since he hasn't said anything that can be considered scummy. Inb4 you say 'he's' acting different, go back and reply to the fact that I act different in my town games, and I know a lot of players do since it isn't AI.In post 713, Robbnva wrote:you REALLY don't want crab lynched.... I wonder why that is?
your reaction to the attention he got is actually why i'm not moving off him anytime soon. Your reaction is far more suspicious than creatures 180
but creature was never about to be lynched.In post 716, Smithereens wrote:I'd say you panicked when it appeared that Creature was about to get lynched, and now you're trying to get pressure off him.
Concern about our wincon is shown when a player get's excited about a discovery of scum they have just made, or concern about other players backflipping on their reads for shit reasons.In post 717, Robbnva wrote:like this part right here can no way come from a rational thinking townie.In post 711, Smithereens wrote:If Rob's town, then he isn't too concerned about the town win con, and he clearly shows it. Otherwise he's scum.
I am playing against my win condition because I think it is better to pressure people instead of limiting the search to 1/2 people especially when we have a bunch of inactive people, people doing jack shit, and even lurkers?![]()
the fact that you want to stay focused on creature/egg and ignore everyone else actually worries me if you are town. it shows you are close minded and town should not be close minded, they should be open minded.
There is nothing weird about the fact that it's not normal for a town to not get hyped about finding a scum and just leave it be. It's like a gold miner who finds a massive nugget and just leaves it in the ground so that he can dig up some more dirt. No, people with a vested interest in finding scum tend to act like a miner looking for gold.In post 721, Infinity 324 wrote:I think smithereens is town but he's weirdly using logic I don't agree with at all to come to conclusions that may make sense