Page 29 of 180
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2018 2:56 pm
by Leodanny
I don’t agree, but okay. Pagetop!
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2018 2:56 pm
by Nancy Drew 39
In post 680, Leodanny wrote:Isn’t town implied?
Why do you see one “hell no” as overreacting?
Why can’t it be both a sheep and OMGUS?
Because he asked you for reads. Why would you react so strongly to that?
It could be but you still haven’t given a reason for it but it’s your refusal to give reads, is the more concerning part of it. Why would you be opposed to that?
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2018 2:59 pm
by Nancy Drew 39
In post 682, Leodanny wrote:I’d say Sheep is a slight scumlean, solely because he seems to think that CLAIMING AT L-2 IN A 24P GAME IS A BAD IDEA, which I don’t think town would say.
Well, I do agree that you always need to claim as soon as you have a sizeable wagon on you.
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2018 3:03 pm
by Nancy Drew 39
In post 686, hebichan wrote: In post 682, Leodanny wrote:I’d say Sheep is a slight scumlean, solely because he seems to think that CLAIMING AT L-2 IN A 24P GAME IS A BAD IDEA, which I don’t think town would say.
Town has told me this plenty of times after I have claimed.
There's no benefit to scum not wanting you to claim.
I don’t think sheep is scum here but the obvious benefit would be a mislynch. If someone is at L-2 or even L-3, they can’t afford to risk it.
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2018 3:06 pm
by Nancy Drew 39
In post 694, Kokichi Oma wrote: In post 675, hebichan wrote:I'm afraid that a lot of the scum is in inactive slots like kokichi or wagonomics or other hard to read slots.
Scummy post.
Says I could be scum cause im inactive. I have more posts than her. Contradiction.
I think it’s NAI but you’re definitely not being “inactive”.
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2018 3:08 pm
by hebichan
In post 694, Kokichi Oma wrote: In post 675, hebichan wrote:I'm afraid that a lot of the scum is in inactive slots like kokichi or wagonomics or other hard to read slots.
Scummy post.
Says I could be scum cause im inactive. I have more posts than her. Contradiction.
Do you? I guess I didn't check very hard. I had a bad perception then. Still I don't actually remember you doing anything.
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2018 4:09 pm
by Gamma Emerald
aaaaargh
I’m salty rn, what do you want
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2018 4:17 pm
by Wisdom
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2018 4:20 pm
by Wisdom
In post 668, sheepsaysmeep wrote:it just still feels heavily like someone who doesnt know how to approach a large game as wolf
bingo
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2018 5:02 pm
by Party Boat
Leo's still a fine vote, I wouldn't mind hearing reads from Jaylow and Theta and some others too though.
singleton I think is town after rereading a bit
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2018 5:07 pm
by Party Boat
It would also be borderline criminal to continue on without an updated wagonomics forecast
gotta have all that market info
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 12:03 am
by TheBrie
About Gamma Emerald, I've said he's not really scum hunting or pushing anything despite all his posts, and he could do more as town. But he could also do more as scum. It's been too long since i've played with him, or really anyone here, for me to have a good handle on his play style.
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 2:25 am
by Vaxkiller
In post 585, Varsoon wrote: In post 574, singletonking wrote:FWIW I think it's best to ignore that neighbourhood in terms of scumhunting, i.e. not have it affect your reads in terms of town/scum ratio, except of course that all of them being scum is implausible.
I think it's funny that you came to the same conclusion I did but still asked me why I outted the PT and acted like I didn't come to this conclusion.
I may have to re-read because I got hte impression you were looking int eh hood for scum, and this is pretty much the reasoning why you come off scummy to me. Also why the hell am I on a sheep wagon with you?
UNVOTE:
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 2:38 am
by Vaxkiller
VOTE: Varsoon
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 2:40 am
by Vaxkiller
Last market value was at 40 too... so this is a good time to invest, before the market goes to high.
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 2:42 am
by Varsoon
Das fair, buy low, sell high.
Or don't sell at all?
I dunno how the heck Wagonomics works.
And I've always been pretty transparent about it:
I'm treating the hood like it's not really alignment indicative for now.
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 2:50 am
by Vaxkiller
I really don't want to lynch you, I like to having you around, but reading through your earlier posts didn't instill me with feelings of townlyness
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 2:56 am
by Varsoon
/shrugs
At least I'm liked.
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 3:45 am
by Leodanny
In post 701, Nancy Drew 39 wrote: In post 680, Leodanny wrote:Isn’t town implied?
Why do you see one “hell no” as overreacting?
Why can’t it be both a sheep and OMGUS?
Because he asked you for reads. Why would you react so strongly to that?
It could be but you still haven’t given a reason for it but it’s your refusal to give reads, is the more concerning part of it. Why would you be opposed to that?
My word choice really needs to be better.
Anyway, what I meant was I didn’t have three reads, I have too many townreads. Not that I wouldn’t give him my reads.
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 4:09 am
by singletonking
Varsoon, the issue I have with you is this: you first outed your neighbourhood because you believed it contained at least one scum, but then you were the first to propose that your neighbourhood could be all town. I find these mindsets conflicting.
Can you reconcile this?
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 4:11 am
by Purrcocet
<3 <3 <3
I wanted you to be the righteous charge of glory and lead the sheep wagon with me
(Kokitten is scum btw so we cld do that too)
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 4:15 am
by singletonking
Btw does anyone know how to read Wagonomic's charts? Is he townreading the big/green numbers and scumreading the low/red numbers or what?
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 4:21 am
by Varsoon
In post 719, singletonking wrote:Varsoon, the issue I have with you is this: you first outed your neighbourhood because you believed it contained at least one scum, but then you were the first to propose that your neighbourhood could be all town. I find these mindsets conflicting.
Can you reconcile this?
Even if it
could
have scum, that doesn't mean that it does.
I outted the hood because
1. IF there is scum there, then any info we share there is not safe from being stolen.
2. IF there is scum there, ya'll can PoE figure out who scum is later in the game.
3. Regardless of if there is scum there or not, it becomes incredibly obvious when 4 people are having out-of-main-thread discussion; any decent player would realize we have some sort of alternate means of interaction, which may get us falsely scumread. Even basic players catch on to this and get suspicious of players who seem to have info they don't/interactions that they haven't seen.
4. The game thread itself, on the other hand, is guaranteed to have the usual ratio of town to non-town alignments. Hunting there should be our priority, as if we're wrong about scum being in the neighborhood, we PoE ourselves into a sunk-cost 4-town-mislynch.
Does that make sense?
How many times do I have to write this out?
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 4:36 am
by singletonking
Wait, are you saying that you outed the neighbourhood in case scum were in it, not that you actually think scum is in it?
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 4:42 am
by Leodanny