Mafiascum.net

In post 657, Lovebird wrote:

In post 631, Fractured wrote:Lovebird - Very absent, neither of us feel much about them. We have the same sentiment with Johnny and we don't have meta or reason to think it's AI.

The game's only been two days

Fractured could be scum. Last two posts are bad.

So with you being OK with voting , and finding that posts are scummy without reason, usscum now means you have 5 scumreads and are willing to vote them.

Yet you're sticking with your original vote... and are not absolving any of these reads.

In post 699, Michael Scott wrote:

In post 695, Fractured wrote:A lot of people are voteparking or jumping around without any resolution to their reads.... assuming they have them.

Yeah, on my occasional visit to the thread I noticed this. Like nearly 30 pages and no real wagons being pushed.
Hence the questions to people to back up with their thought processes, and give me something to evaluate.

So you have a dozen posts and that's our fault somehow?

I am trying to be able to tell if Auro is posting or Volxen is posting (this helps me dissect thought patterns better).
Are the latest posts from Volxen?

That is what I was thinking.

In post 701, Alonzo wrote:So you have a dozen posts and that's our fault somehow?

Contentless (in a sense) posting is your collective fault, yea.

In post 687, Michael Scott wrote:Volxen's MIA too >.>

@Brigitte.

Do you have prior experience with me?

Read some of your games Auror. Think I played with you once.

In post 699, Michael Scott wrote:

In post 695, Fractured wrote:A lot of people are voteparking or jumping around without any resolution to their reads.... assuming they have them.

Yeah, on my occasional visit to the thread I noticed this. Like nearly 30 pages and no real wagons being pushed.
Hence the questions to people to back up with their thought processes, and give me something to evaluate.

I'm feeling similarly and I think the other head does too.

Brigitte wrote:I am trying to be able to tell if Auro is posting or Volxen is posting (this helps me dissect thought patterns better).
Are the latest posts from Volxen?

That is what I was thinking.

So you're using meta for them? I find the suspicion on them to be thoroughly unconvincing.

Alonzo wrote:

In post 699, Michael Scott wrote:

In post 695, Fractured wrote:A lot of people are voteparking or jumping around without any resolution to their reads.... assuming they have them.

Yeah, on my occasional visit to the thread I noticed this. Like nearly 30 pages and no real wagons being pushed.
Hence the questions to people to back up with their thought processes, and give me something to evaluate.

So you have a dozen posts and that's our fault somehow?

This hydra had dozens of posts since last night, so I don't get your point.

Also, you have half-dozen posts that revolve around directly gamesolving and stating your positions. You have several people pushing votes on you but you haven't engaged, why?

In post 706, Fractured wrote:So you're using meta for them? I find the suspicion on them to be thoroughly unconvincing.

Nope, just want to get inside the head of the person who is posting.

In post 707, Brigitte wrote:

In post 706, Fractured wrote:So you're using meta for them? I find the suspicion on them to be thoroughly unconvincing.

Nope, just want to get inside the head of the person who is posting.

If it's a wall with large text in places, it's 99% Volxen.
If it's not a wall it's 100% Auro.

In post 708, Michael Scott wrote:

In post 707, Brigitte wrote:

In post 706, Fractured wrote:So you're using meta for them? I find the suspicion on them to be thoroughly unconvincing.

Nope, just want to get inside the head of the person who is posting.

If it's a wall with large text in places, it's 99% Volxen.
If it's not a wall it's 100% Auro.

So that means this must be Volxen!
= )

In post 706, Fractured wrote:You have several people pushing votes on you but you haven't engaged, why?

I think the lack of concern over being shaded/wagoned is town indicative to an extent, what do you think?

Barely

RCs push/suspicion of me came out of nowhere and is yet unclarified despite him having plenty of games with me to build a meta based case.

Eddie is policy an transparent

Parma is unfounded, not backed up

LB is seeping RC

Are there more?

Alonzo can you answer this post:

In post 683, Parmigiano Reggiano wrote:

In post 682, Alonzo wrote:Lovebirds hit and run was scripted and fake.

Almost certainly in the scumchat

Explain?

Brb oatmeal.

Merging posting styles is... an experience.

Brigitte, are you still townreading Mbaki?

Yes, are you not?

We know parma is reading other people, so why maintain the unfounded stuff and come up with something more concrete on me?

Pedit. That was my gut reaction to lovebirds posts, and the two or three select moment they chose to find suspicious in 15 pages

Seems weird to think lovebird posts seems scripted....they are pretty bland posts when I read them. What posts specifically gave you the gut feeling that it was a scripted?

Waffliness and poor pushes (quoted above) seems weird. I'm not sure if this is necessarily AI for the slot, but no, I'm not townreading them.
You said your reason for townreading the slot was that their posting seemed natural, yeah? This may have been answered before but - do you have prior experience with mbaki, and have you accurately identified their alignment using this in previous games?

Like I mentioned I’m on phone (also not a ton of time to look closely at stuff) until Saturday evening. So not gonna explain anything in depth til then. In the mean time, you can assume any thought process anyone is asking about has an answer of “I did it on a whim”.

Also Michael Scott is still scum~~~~~~||||~~~~~

In post 717, Brigitte wrote:Seems weird to think lovebird posts seems scripted....they are pretty bland posts when I read them. What posts specifically gave you the gut feeling that it was a scripted?

The posts themselves were nothing. The target selection didn't feel genuine at all.

The activity scumcase is unconvincing, you gotta come up with something more.

Also for the person who asked when rc first mentioned alkzno scum i was meh. I’m much less meh on it now for reasons to be explained later maybe

In post 718, Michael Scott wrote:

Spoiler:

In post 212, mbaki wrote:VOTE: Michael Scott

I won't push your lynch because , but I believe you're more likely scum than town.

In post 261, mbaki wrote:VOTE: Fractured

In post 262, mbaki wrote:UNVOTE:

In post 376, mbaki wrote:there's no answer to 375 that advances the game

VOTE: Fractured

In post 445, mbaki wrote:I don't know how to read Lovebird, my honest answer is I didn't like their content but deferring to RC is better here
Michael Scott meh, scummish via the fact most of the people posting are generally townie

In post 558, mbaki wrote:VOTE: Fractured

In post 559, mbaki wrote:UNVOTE:

In post 567, mbaki wrote:VOTE: FRACTURED

Waffliness and poor pushes (quoted above) seems weird. I'm not sure if this is necessarily AI for the slot, but no, I'm not townreading them.
You said your reason for townreading the slot was that their posting seemed natural, yeah? This may have been answered before but - do you have prior experience with mbaki, and have you accurately identified their alignment using this in previous games?

I mean I have quite a bit of experience with Eddie but more as town. I don't know if I agree with this analysis of the pushes waffliness/poor pushes. I think this explanation might be too simplistic but I believe their is more over-explanation/fake questioning with a scumEddie, and I don't see that here yet. I wouldn't claim to be a master mbaki reader though.

In post 720, Alonzo wrote:

In post 717, Brigitte wrote:Seems weird to think lovebird posts seems scripted....they are pretty bland posts when I read them. What posts specifically gave you the gut feeling that it was a scripted?

The posts themselves were nothing. The target selection didn't feel genuine at all.

Okay, I don't really have an opinion on the genuineness of lovebird posts right now..

Who do you have opinions on?