Mafiascum.net

In post 640, Papa Zito wrote:Friendly reminder that meta is trash

In post 621, RCEnigma wrote:That hard townreading me is an easy pocket. It is.

In post 633, I Will Be Nice wrote:I feel like I may be digging this up again when it's kind of blown over, but I would feel bad if I didn't address this.
I can understand why you may have felt attacked by panthaleon's push, but I think it stepped over the line to attack panthaleon's character and to get abusive like this with people around this time. If you're really frustrated with people's play (and especially so if you think they're town) then it's probably better to just ignore him rather than being mean about it? Especially since you have to know that if this is how he's already reacting to abrasive content, it's probably helping no one/going to make things worse, right?

In post 696, Painting Trap wrote:

In post 666, RCEnigma wrote:

In post 664, 0verki11 wrote:

In post 662, panthaleon wrote:I only asked about Zito because it seemed the realest out of those three ._ .

why doesnt the vault dealer wagon feel valid/real?

Seems like an in-joke in a pt somewhere

VOTE: Overkill

this is a stretch.

chen

In post 693, Karnage wrote:

In post 669, Blatant Scum wrote:

In post 650, Cephrir wrote:Deadline for Day 1: 6 days, 21 hours, 9 minutes.

VOTE: 0verki11
I ask Painting Trap, Karnage, TheWayItEnds, Cookie Bakers, Josh Wilkinson to vote someone.
I suggest constructing at least one wagon before the day is over.

ok, why 0verki11? I skimmed his ISO and nothing is jumping out at me.

In post 697, Painting Trap wrote:

In post 671, Blatant Scum wrote:

In post 441, Blatant Scum wrote:

In post 383, Painting Trap wrote:you are aware that you're allowed to say "oops my bad i was so tunneled i didnt notice and i dont really know why i didn't pick up on it" right????

In post 384, Painting Trap wrote:

In post 234, panthaleon wrote:So as far I am concerned, bitbringer is promising to make this game as difficult for town as possible. I am content to lynch them on those grounds.

In the meantime I'm kinda into Zito town for his response to bitbringer nonsense, and I would like chemist to elaborate more on his read on me as I believe he's still voting me, even after it being clarified that RC mentioned spamming as scummy before me.

this doesn't really sound like you accepted it

What was the point of these two posts?

In the first post, it seems to me that you are asking Panthaleon to stop tunneling Bitbringer and start producing content, offering that you won't dig in his past actions (you are talking to him like to potential town).

In the second post, you push Panthaleon back to defending his behaviour, taking TvS (or SvT) stance.

Did I misinterpret these two posts?

In post 634, Blatant Scum wrote:

In post 631, 0verki11 wrote:

In post 628, Blatant Scum wrote:

In post 625, 0verki11 wrote:we are going to pretend I can spell

You didn't respond on my shade.

Didnt feel it was really needed
I feel like that you and Panth are scum for the reasons I already stated

Wanna 1v1 me at least?

I feel ignored.

i think it was obvious that the first post was a rhetorical question?

In post 702, bitbringer wrote:

In post 633, I Will Be Nice wrote:I feel like I may be digging this up again when it's kind of blown over, but I would feel bad if I didn't address this.
I can understand why you may have felt attacked by panthaleon's push, but I think it stepped over the line to attack panthaleon's character and to get abusive like this with people around this time. If you're really frustrated with people's play (and especially so if you think they're town) then it's probably better to just ignore him rather than being mean about it? Especially since you have to know that if this is how he's already reacting to abrasive content, it's probably helping no one/going to make things worse, right?

u haven't even seen abusive if u think that was abusive.

also i don't think ur reading very well because that comment u quoted was at RCE not at panth.

In post 706, RCEnigma wrote:Oh...I didn't see that first time around. Pocket denied.

In post 447, Almost50 wrote:one is lurking. *Le Sigh*

In post 709, Shiro wrote:

In post 447, Almost50 wrote:one is lurking. *Le Sigh*

I wasn't lurking, I was ignorant Dx Not that you knew that yet but eh. This post is more of an indication of where I am right now.

~Shiro

In post 698, Papa Zito wrote: You fucked it up on multiple levels.

F

In post 696, Painting Trap wrote:

In post 666, RCEnigma wrote:

In post 664, 0verki11 wrote:

In post 662, panthaleon wrote:I only asked about Zito because it seemed the realest out of those three ._ .

why doesnt the vault dealer wagon feel valid/real?

Seems like an in-joke in a pt somewhere

VOTE: Overkill

this is a stretch.

chen

In post 716, Blatant Scum wrote:KidAmn, what do you think about selfvoters?

pisskop wrote:kidadmin!

In post 718, Papa Zito wrote:Bold strategy Cotton etc

In post 721, pisskop wrote:

In post 718, Papa Zito wrote:Bold strategy Cotton etc

truth be told I am not too happy with that wagon comp.