Mafiascum.net

lol zenith and dolittle sounds like a fun interaction to watch for tomorrow

I meant your second sentence @Skitter.

But anyways, I do feel like maf found a nice opportunity in this. I'm guessing it's Vork, because I don't know if Town would really let it prolong this long.

Adios Amigos~

In post 701, GeorgeBailey wrote:

Town

would really let it prolong this long.

EBWOP Maf*

In post 667, DrDolittle wrote:ew I literally told you my internet

And what part of "IF VORK WAS THE SCUMZ" did your shitty internet prevent you from understanding?

Oh hammer

In post 672, skitter30 wrote:from my pov it's two of {tictac/ddl/vork/bailey/zenith}

Skitter having literally only 1 town read at this point in the game is EXTREMELY concerning.

Lynching

With 9 votes in play, it takes 5 to lynch.

GeorgeBailey

(5): DrDolittle, tictac, Suspicious, Vorkuta, skitter30 <--

LYNCH

tictac

(1): Zenith

Vorkuta

(1): GeorgeBailey

Not Voting

(2): january, Jamelia

Deadline:

(expired on 2019-10-27 08:30:00).

[/area]

[/area]

[/area]

Lynching

With 7 votes in play, it takes 4 to lynch.

Everybody

(0): Nobody

Not Voting

(7): DrDolittle, january, skitter30, Suspicious, tictac, Vorkuta, Zenith

Deadline:

(expired on 2019-11-05 07:45:00).

[/area]

morning, happy scumday to vork

is it worth asking who did not vote for shorter night? or is it irrelevant?

also i would like to open today with a scumread on skitter

i would like to lynch them today

thoughts?

<3

Distancing from your scum partner- I dig it

In post 711, january wrote:also i would like to open today with a scumread on skitter

i would like to lynch them today

thoughts?

Ok let's talk about this

VOTE: vork

*talk about how you want to lynch me

In post 710, january wrote:morning, happy scumday to vork

is it worth asking who did not vote for shorter night? or is it irrelevant?

wanted to take time to think

this is what I came p with, plz tell me if it makes sense.
when things, fall into place like this, that usually means I've gone mental.

here we go:
fancy push on Jam could be an attempt to drive a counterwagon to zen. starts at 67
167 fancy defense of zen via nullread.
skitter enters and scumreads zen
doc enters and talks skit into voting Bailey instead

doc about zen wrote:like out of the posts you highlighted out of zen I don't think any of them are particularly scummy. meanwhile I like his L-1, and the fact that he thought it was L-2... I don't think scum makes that kind of mistakes, and his other posts feel fairly good as well?

doc about bailey wrote:Bailey's flailing so hard and voting conf town in 579. This is flipping red

being confused is a reason to TR zen but a reason to scumread bailey? I don't think this makes sense.

My thoughts about the Bailey lynch was 'meh, I guess this will do'. I think most of ya felt the same. But not Zen and Doc. One took the 'pro'-position and one took the 'against'-position, like classic scum.

Regardless, I think there was very little reason for scum to get their hands dirty with the bailey wagon (after the mason-reveal).
Vork gets a townpoint for flipping his stance on Bailey when scum-him had very little reason to do so and a good reason not to.
The only non-confirmed person here who expressed no interest in the lynch nor intent to hammer, gets a vote

VOTE: Zen

{jan/skitter}

In post 227, january wrote:out of curiosity, how much “coaching” between mafia members usually occurs in the mafia chat?

huh- CJ being december's hypo!scum partner would explain this comment- there's a night/day difference between CJ's and skitters level of..... 'involvement' in the game.

In post 261, january wrote:can ceejay be prodded it's been almost 48 hours

reading between the lines "can I get a better scum partner PLEASE???"

And the kicker

In post 298, january wrote:and i’d like to at least give skitter a chance to play - can we not vote her today pls

"hey now that I've gotten a really cool scum partner can we PLEASE not lynche her? kthnx"

And who knows what plan of action they've decided on in their scumPT but "hey lets distance and stir up a bit of drama for show" sounds alright, especially considering bailey's "dying remark" was "its skitter- vork u suk btw"

VOTE: Skitter

Vork what happened to the creepy fawning thing?

In post 716, Vorkuta wrote:huh- CJ being december's hypo!scum partner would explain this comment- there's a night/day difference between CJ's and skitters level of..... 'involvement' in the game.

This is said in the main thread because ...?

In post 716, Vorkuta wrote:reading between the lines "can I get a better scum partner PLEASE???"

Again, said in the main thread because ...

In post 717, skitter30 wrote:Vork what happened to the creepy fawning thing?

Pardon? Kindly clarify and rephrase

In post 718, skitter30 wrote:This is said in the main thread because ...?

LAMIST points
I even pointed it out back when

In post 228, Vorkuta wrote:attempt at town spewing noted

Except it took me a while to connect dots

In post 716, Vorkuta wrote:And who knows what plan of action they've decided on in their scumPT but "hey lets distance and stir up a bit of drama for show" sounds alright, especially considering bailey's "dying remark" was "its skitter- vork u suk btw"

Explain this very slowly

- why does this distancing need to happen ?
- why is bailey's dying remark relevant here ?
- why doesnt january vote me if we're distancing ?

In post 495, Vorkuta wrote:skitter and papa leaf are just players that I probably will never be able to read confidently and the hypothetical utility that they may bring to town will outweigh any case I may come up with for lynching either of them early.

This thing that you've done the last three times i've played with you ^

In post 720, Vorkuta wrote:LAMIST points
I even pointed it out back when

There's literally no reason to say this either of those in the main thread, why would you get LAMIST points for this

@tictac i had that doc/zen theory for a lot of day1 as well but i think zenith eod was townie