Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 7:20 pm
Pisskop, why didn't you or your associate claim it? Or is ascetic hider a joke?
I back eyescott up in that my role PM and flavour are separate PMs. But eyescott, you say theres a antitown flavour related person and you're spilling people's flavour hints evverywhere?In post 619, momo wrote:I don't know if this is because you forgot something or because of malicious intent, but this is a blatant lie. I know this because I didn't get flavor for my role name. I got a role PM as would be expected in any game. I received a flavor message the next day brought to my by the role flavorer. This could be mod error in waiting a day, or it could be that you are lying. Which is it?In post 600, eyestott wrote:@alimdia (and mono): I am the ROLE flavorer. My abilities are only to do with your role name.
Neighborizer sounds useless as both alignementsIn post 654, Churros wrote:I still think Titus is the most likely scum slot here, but I don't think she is likely a EP partner. I wouldn't say it's impossible though, no one should completely clear her if EP is scum, but yeah I would give her some credit.
Titus scum read on EP seems forced no matter how I look at it, even if I do have to some degree a scum read on Espresso for the way he handled the adorable wagon. Titus hard scum read on him though came way before that and it lacks any kind of real progression or her weightning possibilities. It's just a mindless replay of "EP scum, EP scum, EP scum" with little to no reason even when I tried to interact with her.
/quote]In post 689, Rabid Schnauzer wrote:Mastina is scum. She's either lying that she's intimately familiar with me, or lying that this is my scum game.
FWIW I'm a 1X neighborizer. Since I'm town it's worthless per se, but I thought that I'd save it and at least be able to check if someone later claimed ascetic or hider or something.
Eyestott*In post 702, alimdia wrote:I back eyescott up in that my role PM and flavour are separate PMs. But eyescott, you say theres a antitown flavour related person and you're spilling people's flavour hints evverywhere?
- Okay, that's a lot easier to understand. I'm just going to presume that (bolded) is an assumption since it's not actually confirmed afaict.In post 669, mastina wrote:I can explain it very very very simply.In post 602, Egix96 wrote:This is an unsatisfying progression coming from that whole wallcase you made on Adorable.
I only have one vote in the game--one vote. I can only vote one player at a time.
There are three scum in the game--three, not one. I can only vote one scum player at a time, in spite of there being three of them. I can, and have, been casing on all three, applying pressure to all three, but votes are the strongest form of pressure and I only have one to use between the three of them.
Refusing to budge my vote on one scum, when there are two other scum, is a good way to guarantee that,
1: I am accused, unjustifiably, of tunneling in on a single player,
2: And preventing us from lynching a player who is actually scum, because if I am dividing the votes between the scum player of my choice and the scum player of the rest of the town's choice, then the town is divided between two scum candidates resulting in neither getting lynched at the end of the day.
Thus.
I need to be willing to compromise, be fluid, be willing to switch my votes between those scumreads.
Moving my vote off of them doesn't mean I don't think they're scum--it means that I think someone else who is scum is more likely to be able to be lynched.
Mate if you thought I was saying that to get a rise out of him that's on you, not me, because I made it crystal clear that I was scumreading pisskop for real--the BP slot was always in my POE pool, and then pisskop replaced in and did fuckall of nothing.In post 602, Egix96 wrote:So I see, you DO actually think p*kop is scum, and it wasn't just something you said to get a rise out of him... Perhaps if you had made that clear in the first place then the momentum might have been there. Just saying.
Seriously, try an iso of pisskop and see what he's done this game.
Literally nothing.
What are those?In post 683, pisskop wrote:I prefer to think of hydras more likeIn post 77, EspressoPatronum wrote:"hydra dissonance" is exactly the term I didn't know I needed.Ettins
My theory is that he's probably fucking around.In post 692, mastina wrote:And neither BP nor yourself mentioned this until now...why?
I have a theory about that, and it's identical to this one:
In a game like this it's practically a VT claim though.In post 695, EspressoPatronum wrote:Why do you think this?In post 692, mastina wrote:[...]This be a scumclaim.In post 689, Rabid Schnauzer wrote:FWIW I'm a 1X neighborizer. Since I'm town it's worthless per se, but I thought that I'd save it and at least be able to check if someone later claimed ascetic or hider or something.
Wouldn't scum in RS's shoes claim loyal neighbourizer to later fake a guilty? His plain neighbourizer claim seems more town imo.
This be a scumclaim.[/quote]In post 689, Rabid Schnauzer wrote:FWIW I'm a 1X neighborizer. Since I'm town it's worthless per se, but I thought that I'd save it and at least be able to check if someone later claimed ascetic or hider or something.
Yeah, rereading it I see what you mean.In post 708, Egix96 wrote: Also, I'm not actually sure whether the "This" in mastna's post refers to Rabid's post, or pkop's.
In post 708, Egix96 wrote:In a game like this it's practically a VT claim though.In post 695, EspressoPatronum wrote:Why do you think this?In post 692, mastina wrote:[...]This be a scumclaim.In post 689, Rabid Schnauzer wrote:FWIW I'm a 1X neighborizer. Since I'm town it's worthless per se, but I thought that I'd save it and at least be able to check if someone later claimed ascetic or hider or something.
Wouldn't scum in RS's shoes claim loyal neighbourizer to later fake a guilty? His plain neighbourizer claim seems more town imo.
Also, I'm not actually sure whether the "This" in mastna's post refers to Rabid's post, or pkop's.
"This" in 689 refers to mastina's post.In post 710, Rabid Schnauzer wrote:Yeah, rereading it I see what you mean.In post 708, Egix96 wrote: Also, I'm not actually sure whether the "This" in mastna's post refers to Rabid's post, or pkop's.
yea i should really play the game more.....In post 705, Egix96 wrote:(Before pkop complains about me saying this - had he done more, I might not have voted him, either time.)
Ahh, I see. The 'this' in "this be a scumclaim."In post 714, Rabid Schnauzer wrote:We weren't talking about your this.
The action they target me with, does not work on scumkillIn post 712, Titus wrote:Is it the action they target you with only or any action?
Do you mean a 1-shot is doubled to 2-shot, or that an action taken on you can be repeated again in the same night on someone else?In post 711, gobbledygook wrote:I’m a duplicater. After targeting me a persons action is doubled
It's you saying things like this that makes me believe you're scum. Instead of making a legitimate push on someone or make a case based on your play this game, your town case is based on your meta. You've clearly put a lot of time into thinking about the way you play and trying to avoid a clear pattern to your scum game. Paraphrasing you, in this game you're trying to do everything you wouldn't do as scum, which is exactly what I would expect scum!RS to do here.In post 709, Rabid Schnauzer wrote:Oh please, I thought you were intimately familiar with me or some such.
Do you recall a game when:
- I was scum
- I didn't do much early D1
- I got run up toward end of D1 (by Skitter IIRC)?
Why don't you tell people what I did in that situation?
I claimed goon cop, and coasted on that all the way to the end.
Scum!rabid doesn't come in saying he has a boring role, then claim neighborizer when run up.