Mafiascum.net

Target	Wagon
Cycle Men (4)	NorwegianboyEE (155), Deimos27 (588), Isis (614), Elements (659)
Deimos27 (3)	Firebringer (390), Albert B. Rampage (391), Green Crayons (404)
Firebringer (2)	Cycle Men (152), votato (548)
NorwegianboyEE (2)	Looker (456), Alisae (647)
Elements (1)	humaneatingmonkey (663)
Not Voting (0)

With 12 alive, it takes 7 to lynch. The Day 1 deadline is in (expired on 2020-05-08 06:42:59).

In post 692, humaneatingmonkey wrote:I got a tone of abrasiveness in this one and this one. I don't recall you missing any of my questions. I think your reactions cater more to posts and not situations, and that strikes me as... inorganic.

This strikes me as...full of shit. What situations are occurring that are not accurately reflected in people's posts?

There's your tone of abrasiveness.

Situations are a sum of people's posts and the subtext behind it. You're focused only on nitpicking stuff from people and not on the big picture. You haven't commented on your take on situations.

Looker is that kind of guy.
Not saying it’s town or scum. It’s just in his character.

Abrasiveness or? Can you describe him for me?

In post 690, Looker wrote:I think some of these people are just trying to get town brownie points by doing nothing.

I think this is what he's doing.

So you have no situations as examples. Got it.

Lots of abrasive questions, nitpicks, and snark — but he doesn't feel like he's actually solving the game. This is why we can't play him in this game.

No actually do some legwork and tell me what you think the situations were so we can see your POV.

In post 707, humaneatingmonkey wrote:This is why we can't play him in this game.

EBWOP: This is why we can't place him in this game.

You were right the first time.

Also...

So what, are you actually scumreading me right now for wanting more out of you?

...I'm not pathetic enough to accuse me for you. I'm holding my tongue, because "do some legwork" is a stupid thing to say and I'm hoping most of you idiots will putter yourselves out. If you have a question, ask it, if you have an accusation, accuse. Otherwise, fuck off.

...I'm not pathetic enough to accuse me for you. I'm holding my tongue, because "do some legwork" is a stupid thing to say and I'm hoping most of you idiots will putter yourselves out. If you have a question, ask it, if you have an accusation, accuse. Otherwise, fuck off.

Found my second scum.

Oooh, twice, the site must really want me to be heard. Or to up my post count (high post count = town, right?) fuckin amateurs

In post 707, humaneatingmonkey wrote:Lots of abrasive questions, nitpicks, and snark — but he doesn't feel like he's actually solving the game

I don't agree.

I don't even know what's so threatening about what I'm saying about you. It's not exclusively scum indicative. But it seems like a simple callout on your behavior got you so unnaturally defensive. Otherwise, you would have understood that my POV on you was reasonable? Now I just think you're scum.

I mean, there's the defensive stuff that happened after 707. But that's not what you were talking about.

In post 716, Green Crayons wrote:

In post 707, humaneatingmonkey wrote:Lots of abrasive questions, nitpicks, and snark — but he doesn't feel like he's actually solving the game

I don't agree.

Neither do I.

@cycle you just got hammered. Got any final words for the thread?

-

-