Posted: Fri Jul 31, 2020 3:14 pm
@NDMath, why are you so demotivated?
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
Such as?In post 549, NDMath wrote:I really don't have any fresh perspectives besides being first vote on redtea, because my reads line up with 'town consensus' a lot right now.
Agreed. That's a weird statement.In post 567, Joey_ wrote:Why not? if youre softing PR just for the sake of this argument its petty/scummyIn post 565, androgybee wrote:im really not worried with how anyone us reading our slot this game, actually. so think what you want.
Still, though, 5 one-to-two liners doesn't equate to "generating content." I mean, I've replaced into games and have gotten told that I haven't done enough when I post more than 1 or 2 lines and really work on being thorough and understanding the game state. I think you're giving praise over something that isn't really praiseworthy, and I'm not quite sure why that's happening.In post 570, androgybee wrote:they're generating content that doesn't feel like just treading water.
The more that redtea has posted (as I'm reading and catching up), the less confident that I'm feeling in him as scum. I'm willing to stick him back towards my null pile for now.In post 628, catboi wrote:starbuck is more of a PoE thing but the redtea votes are starting to have a hint of opportunism to them
+1. I agree with this. You can separate the difference between someone's tone/whether or not they are genuine from what could be considered shitty reads.In post 641, Jackel98 wrote:I can think someone is town while also hating their reads and how obtusely and self-assuredly they word everything.
+1. I know this pain.In post 648, BananaCucho wrote:I normally struggle to get a good scum read, and am very prone to mislynch because I'm prone to tunnel onto things
If we were like Day 3 or 4, without other options, I could see pushing this. Day 1, it's policy/opportunism at his finest, especially with being V/LA. I just don't like this tactic and find it pretty scummy.In post 675, Joey_ wrote:I know it’s an unpopular proposition in this game and on mafiascum in general, but flipping a low activity player like porkens who hasn’t been mentionned can actually gives a lot of associative infos.
I actually forgot he was here.In post 683, Jackel98 wrote:Also, wouldn't it be hard to tell who actively avoided Porkens and who just forgot that they existed?
Yes, in Weakest Link, he had me hook, line, and sinker. I had a great case about how town he was and everything. He and Dunnstral claimed masons and were scum the whole time. I've never felt so betrayed.In post 699, Bell wrote:@Starbuck, you're saying that you're town reading NDMath and that the last time you town read him he was mafia?
I'm not necessarily town reading him here because I'm trying to figure out if he's doing the same thing that he did in Weakest Link. His ISO there is like 20 posts long and I should go take a look back.In post 704, Bell wrote:Why are you town reading him?
I'm being hung since nahdia decided she scumread me, catboi ok'd it, and everyone else was like "sure I'll compromise".In post 700, Bell wrote:@NDMath, why are you so demotivated?
I was first to say 'joey is town' and now everyone strongly believes that. Banana is a universal townread and catboi is pretty close. redtea was in everyone's hang pool and jackel is in most. I'm skeptical but townlean on both hydras which seems like where most of town is at on D&D.In post 701, Starbuck wrote:Such as?In post 549, NDMath wrote:I really don't have any fresh perspectives besides being first vote on redtea, because my reads line up with 'town consensus' a lot right now.
YesIn post 693, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Joey, the gist of your scumread on Porkens is because you think gamestate suggests it right?
Because he's useless but nobody was pointing it out?
@ i used to play mafia with a bell girl, I assumed soz, I am the worst for thatIn post 701, Starbuck wrote:@Joey It clearly says "he" as the preferred pronoun for Bell. You're using "she" to describe them because I think you're looking at their av and assuming. Just wanted to point that out.
Such as?In post 549, NDMath wrote:I really don't have any fresh perspectives besides being first vote on redtea, because my reads line up with 'town consensus' a lot right now.
Agreed. That's a weird statement.In post 567, Joey_ wrote:Why not? if youre softing PR just for the sake of this argument its petty/scummyIn post 565, androgybee wrote:im really not worried with how anyone us reading our slot this game, actually. so think what you want.
Still, though, 5 one-to-two liners doesn't equate to "generating content." I mean, I've replaced into games and have gotten told that I haven't done enough when I post more than 1 or 2 lines and really work on being thorough and understanding the game state. I think you're giving praise over something that isn't really praiseworthy, and I'm not quite sure why that's happening.In post 570, androgybee wrote:they're generating content that doesn't feel like just treading water.
The more that redtea has posted (as I'm reading and catching up), the less confident that I'm feeling in him as scum. I'm willing to stick him back towards my null pile for now.In post 628, catboi wrote:starbuck is more of a PoE thing but the redtea votes are starting to have a hint of opportunism to them
Also, I typically hate meta talk because it just ends up being a huge rabbit hole, but I appreciate the simple/to the point questions getting answered without it taking away from the game state.
+1. I agree with this. You can separate the difference between someone's tone/whether or not they are genuine from what could be considered shitty reads.In post 641, Jackel98 wrote:I can think someone is town while also hating their reads and how obtusely and self-assuredly they word everything.
+1. I know this pain.In post 648, BananaCucho wrote:I normally struggle to get a good scum read, and am very prone to mislynch because I'm prone to tunnel onto things
If we were like Day 3 or 4, without other options, I could see pushing this. Day 1, it's policy/opportunism at his finest, especially with being V/LA. I just don't like this tactic and find it pretty scummy.In post 675, Joey_ wrote:I know it’s an unpopular proposition in this game and on mafiascum in general, but flipping a low activity player like porkens who hasn’t been mentionned can actually gives a lot of associative infos.
I actually forgot he was here.In post 683, Jackel98 wrote:Also, wouldn't it be hard to tell who actively avoided Porkens and who just forgot that they existed?
I am desperate, really?In post 717, Porkens wrote:Your desperation to flip someone who is on VLA is pathetic and obvious. I’ll be back on Saturday.
In post 413, Porkens wrote:Yeah - I don't have a clue. I'll put something together tomorrow
In post 415, Porkens wrote:As in I don't have any reads because I haven't even skimmed everything yet.
In post 474, Porkens wrote:Only have time for pot shots right now. Hopefully tonight.
In post 485, Porkens wrote:I’m not gunna be able to get to this today. Apologies.
In post 717, Porkens wrote:Your desperation to flip someone who is on VLA is pathetic and obvious. I’ll be back on Saturday.
Hm, I realized all quoted posts beaides the last on was made in the same 24h, so i retract part of this postIn post 721, Joey_ wrote:Ftr, yes it wasn’t that long ago, it was 3-4 days ago yet half the game has been made in the recent days and you were posting regulary, making promises every day and no one ever mentionned any of your falses promises
If youre town, just admit you haven’t given shit to this game