Mafiascum.net

wahts ur take on Dats umlaut?

looks like this is where the action is at;

UNVOTE:
VOTE: marquis

Someone asked me why Marquis' entrance townpinged me so now is a good time for me to try and figure that out.

In post 127, Marquis wrote:hi VOTE: the worst

In post 128, Marquis wrote:zzzz this already looks boring ill deal with things later

In post 129, Marquis wrote:actually VOTE: gypyx l-1

In post 381, Marquis wrote:I should have posted this yesterday but

V/LA until Thurs

This just seems like a very "I don't care how anyone reads me" entrance. I'd expect scum would think strategically about whom to vote so probably wouldn't come in and vote and then instantly change it, and particularly opening with an invitation to a reaction test like that (I really don't think Marquis believed they were putting Gypyx at L-1) seems like they're more interested in seeing what people do and not so much interested in giving a particular impression themselves. I'd also expect scum not to come in on page 5 with an explicit announcement that they're not going to play right now, when Things are already happening in the game.

i really read that quite the opposite way

(pardon fucked up timezones)

marquis, Post #127 (ISO) » Tue Sep 01, 2020 2:20:02 am wrote:hi VOTE: the worst

marquis, Post #128 (ISO) » Tue Sep 01, 2020 2:20:47 am wrote:zzzz this already looks boring ill deal with things later

marquis, Post #129 (ISO) » Tue Sep 01, 2020 2:21:23 am wrote:actually VOTE: gypyx l-1

i find it pretty hard to believe that their impression of the game went from "neutral ergo rvs voting tw" to "zzz this is boring" in 45 seconds.
i find it pretty hard that the gypyx vote was for literally any clean-conscious reason.
the entire intro feels like it's constructed to be read a particular way.

In post 696, the worst wrote:it's never hypocritical to want to elim scum.

:X

In post 700, word321 wrote:wahts ur take on Dats umlaut?

Probably town. Probably. I guess.

In post 702, Umlaut wrote:I'd also expect scum not to come in on page 5 with an explicit announcement that they're not going to play right now, when Things are already happening in the game.

contrary to popular belief, things aren't happening. this is quite possibly the lowest content 25+ page game i've been in.

it's been largely pointless waffling, people jostling for allies, and empty threats that don't carry the risk of execution.

lets actually put someone to L-1 and see what happens.

marquis will do.

Im actually with umlaut on this one regarding marquis

In post 706, Umlaut wrote:

In post 700, word321 wrote:wahts ur take on Dats umlaut?

Probably town. Probably. I guess.

how, from 2 random questions without prior context, and no other kind of input on the thread arrived at that conclusion?

In post 708, word321 wrote:Im actually with umlaut on this one regarding marquis

That's funny because after reading the worst's reply I'm not sure I'm with myself on this one.

In post 702, Umlaut wrote:This just seems like a very "I don't care how anyone reads me" entrance.

I think this is something scum-Marquis is good at, in my limited and dated experience

In post 709, word321 wrote:

In post 706, Umlaut wrote:

In post 700, word321 wrote:wahts ur take on Dats umlaut?

Probably town. Probably. I guess.

how, from 2 random questions without prior context, and no other kind of input on the thread arrived at that conclusion?

Bold of you to describe that reply as a "conclusion"

In post 705, Something_Smart wrote:

In post 696, the worst wrote:it's never hypocritical to want to elim scum.

:X

i know that's like an hilariously incorrect post, i was trying to sound cool :{

In post 707, Hoopla wrote:

In post 702, Umlaut wrote:I'd also expect scum not to come in on page 5 with an explicit announcement that they're not going to play right now, when Things are already happening in the game.

contrary to popular belief, things aren't happening. this is quite possibly the lowest content 25+ page game i've been in.

it's been largely pointless waffling, people jostling for allies, and empty threats that don't carry the risk of execution.

lets actually put someone to L-1 and see what happens.

marquis will do.

react or something

Being overconfident is not cool, kids

projecting too much confidence to try and make things happen is fun :c

In post 704, the worst wrote:(pardon fucked up timezones)

marquis, Post #127 (ISO) » Tue Sep 01, 2020 2:20:02 am wrote:hi VOTE: the worst

marquis, Post #128 (ISO) » Tue Sep 01, 2020 2:20:47 am wrote:zzzz this already looks boring ill deal with things later

marquis, Post #129 (ISO) » Tue Sep 01, 2020 2:21:23 am wrote:actually VOTE: gypyx l-1

i find it pretty hard to believe that their impression of the game went from "neutral ergo rvs voting tw" to "zzz this is boring" in 45 seconds.
i find it pretty hard that the gypyx vote was for literally any clean-conscious reason.
the entire intro feels like it's constructed to be read a particular way.

I think it's pretty townie! I a really non caring nature and just putting someone to L-1 like that is something I don't expect a wolf to do unless they're pretty confident in their own wolf play.

it's not an L-1

i like, specifically very strongly felt those posts were engineered to look nonchalant/towny rather than actually *being* nonchalant/townie

Work is finally calming down so I can happily put more attention to this game. I have townreads on The worst/Marquis/Hoopa/word/Grumpy and I'm not liking Green/Doctor. I wanna get my feet in this game, if you have any questions about some of these reads hit me up!

In post 719, the worst wrote:i like, specifically very strongly felt those posts were engineered to look nonchalant/towny rather than actually *being* nonchalant/townie

So you think wolf them just comes into the thread and makes up some persona and fakes an L-1? Hm, it's certainly something they could do, but I don't think the chance of it being a thing is something we can really base a day 1 execute off of.

ooh ooh you like posting words and have a hot take!
what's got you scumreading graycray?
i think ddl is pretty Polarising so i'm less excited about that; maybe later

pedit: sure, that's fine. i am still happy to vanitywagon players over stuff that reads highly disingenuous to me, and i am enjoying the wagon on them a whole lot!

In post 722, the worst wrote:what's got you scumreading graycray?

I posted my main reasoning a bit ago. The read does deserve a bit of a relook though given Green has posted more content since then, I'll take a look.

In post 723, Clover Ebi wrote:

In post 722, the worst wrote:what's got you scumreading graycray?

I posted my main reasoning a bit ago. The read does deserve a bit of a relook though given Green has posted more content since then, I'll take a look.

It's uh, not as much as I was expecting and I still don't think Green's vote progression makes any sense to me. Doesn't really feel real still.