Posted: Tue Apr 13, 2021 10:06 am
Maybe because if I say the ability, it completely ruins the entire point of using it on them?In post 698, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Ok now you're just being contradictory
If you use an ability that appears to be a dayvig, the intention is that the person your using it on dies.
Also ???In post 685, Totally Not Korina wrote:I cannot confirm the effect of it. I also cannot say what the effect of it is, because that would ruin the entire point of me using it.
This is just a cop-out of having to actually explain anything, when people already find you scummy.
If scum gain an advantage over you claiming it, then why did you claim it was real in the first place?In post 702, Totally Not Korina wrote:Maybe because if I say the ability, it completely ruins the entire point of using it on them?In post 698, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Ok now you're just being contradictory
If you use an ability that appears to be a dayvig, the intention is that the person your using it on dies.
Also ???In post 685, Totally Not Korina wrote:I cannot confirm the effect of it. I also cannot say what the effect of it is, because that would ruin the entire point of me using it.
This is just a cop-out of having to actually explain anything, when people already find you scummy.
It's like saying "Oh, I'm a doctor, and I'm going to heal X".
Scum are just going to not shoot X then.
I cannot say what the ability is because then the entire point of using it is wasted.
And if you were lying, then you deserve to die for purposefully giving us both incomplete and incorrect information.In post 704, Jake The Wolfie wrote:If scum gain an advantage over you claiming it, then why did you claim it was real in the first place?In post 702, Totally Not Korina wrote:Maybe because if I say the ability, it completely ruins the entire point of using it on them?In post 698, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Ok now you're just being contradictory
If you use an ability that appears to be a dayvig, the intention is that the person your using it on dies.
Also ???In post 685, Totally Not Korina wrote:I cannot confirm the effect of it. I also cannot say what the effect of it is, because that would ruin the entire point of me using it.
This is just a cop-out of having to actually explain anything, when people already find you scummy.
It's like saying "Oh, I'm a doctor, and I'm going to heal X".
Scum are just going to not shoot X then.
I cannot say what the ability is because then the entire point of using it is wasted.
Saying that there was a purpose but then not saying what the purpose is is not helpful.In post 706, Totally Not Korina wrote:Because I'm town and feel that telling there was a purpose of my "dayvig" is beneficial?
dont believe.In post 682, Totally Not Korina wrote:Hi, prod received. I'm gonna claim my abilities.
I already used one with the dayvig, but I'm not gonna say the effect because that would ruin it.
Second, I can claim masons with anyone and get a PT with them for the night.
Third I can make anyone hated for the rest of the day.
I can only use one per day.
puke emoji I changed my mind after seeing this
In post 682, Totally Not Korina wrote:Hi, prod received. I'm gonna claim my abilities.
I already used one with the dayvig, but I'm not gonna say the effect because that would ruin it.
Second, I can claim masons with anyone and get a PT with them for the night.
Third I can make anyone hated for the rest of the day.
I can only use one per day.
i'm not really sure what the dayvig actually is, how many of these are true, or why you didn't just start the game suggesting everyone claim masons with youIn post 689, Totally Not Korina wrote:This is fakeclaim mafia. My abilities do not correspond with the presumed action. Fark did not die when I "dayvig'd" them, so it's clearly not a dayvig. The fact you're trying to push me for something that has clearly not been that is weird.
@Fark, I absolutely will tomorrow. My abilities are limited to one per day. In theory, we could just not have the thread locked if everyone claims masons with me and Fark tomorrow, when I use it.
In post 291, Jake The Wolfie wrote:No
these sorts of posts aren't really helpful but i feel like as scum he wouldn't be trying to antagonize you here as you're starting to get annoyed with him and vote him (and i'm p sure he knew he was being antagonizing) + i think he would have made more of an effort to try to like 'appease' you so to speak instead of just dismissing youIn post 293, Jake The Wolfie wrote:And if we have, I don't remember it, because I have no thought