Mafiascum.net

In post 698, JamesTheNames wrote:Stop being stubborn it's so clear that you don't have any cases against me anymore.

A+ defense. I am totally convinced.

That was to Mo.

In post 696, JamesTheNames wrote:651 is literally me quoting the answers I already gave you, with 2 added words.

now you are changing the narrative --

first it was that you already responded and that my choices weren't needed to suffice your understanding .

but now it is that you already had the answers

i asked the question in post the 400s and you respond to me with no answer but something bout backing down

and never add ur "post numbers"

but now after alstro + pressure u on more after literally a shit ton of posts of me telling u to answer u try to find ur answers? and quote something way before when the question was asked and say that was ur answer? and say that you added the yes / no?

get outta here


pls town tell me this is not scum

In post 699, JamesTheNames wrote:

In post 697, Val89 wrote:

In post 681, JamesTheNames wrote:337 is 134 less than 571, and 491 is 80 less.

The maths is absolutely spot on, but that only matters if you did in fact answer the question in #491.

You didn't. I've pointed this out, Grandpa pointed this out,Alstro pointed this out. Now, all 3 of us can't be scum, can we?

In post 337, JamesTheNames wrote:Ergo probably T3.

THAT IS WAY BEFORE MY QUESTION??

WHICH U NEVER BROUGHT UP IN UR FIRST RESPONSE

In post 337, JamesTheNames wrote:If I had to say at gun point, probably Val89 or TF3, considering the really unnatural pocketing you did, it also doesn't have to be for reasons of: "let me pocket you so we can hammer James". It could just be used for later on. Regarding you're 219, surely the opposite is true also? Just because they agree with you doesn't make them town, even more reason which you've provided yourself as to how nonsense your early town cred giving to Val89 was. That's the only interaction I've seen including you which could harbour a scum pair. I don't get why you'd actually pocket a scum team though, or assign town cred to a scum partner over something like that. For TF3, 288 makes 0 sense to me, there is no chance this game is exactly the same as the previous one you were in, you had your points and opinions then you discredited them really randomly.

Ergo probably T3.

do you see how james is flipping the narrative now to include answers that was before the question that was never in their intitial response???

In post 703, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 699, JamesTheNames wrote:

In post 697, Val89 wrote:

In post 681, JamesTheNames wrote:337 is 134 less than 571, and 491 is 80 less.

The maths is absolutely spot on, but that only matters if you did in fact answer the question in #491.

You didn't. I've pointed this out, Grandpa pointed this out,Alstro pointed this out. Now, all 3 of us can't be scum, can we?

In post 337, JamesTheNames wrote:Ergo probably T3.

THAT IS WAY BEFORE MY QUESTION??

WHICH U NEVER BROUGHT UP IN UR FIRST RESPONSE

You asked me questions which already have been answered, I keep saying I've answered them, I've proven I've answered them, you keep going on about absolutely nonsense.

In post 491, JamesTheNames wrote:

In post 488, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 487, JamesTheNames wrote:

In post 486, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 484, JamesTheNames wrote:Explain your unvote. I'm curious.

im just thinking rn

Thinking what?

u think t3 is possible more liable to be my scumpartner than val?

t3 the person who i scumread?

do you think i would bus as scum here?

I think it was intended as a back up because you were confident you could get me hammered.

In post 495, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 491, JamesTheNames wrote:

In post 488, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 487, JamesTheNames wrote:

In post 486, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 484, JamesTheNames wrote:Explain your unvote. I'm curious.

im just thinking rn

Thinking what?

u think t3 is possible more liable to be my scumpartner than val?

t3 the person who i scumread?

do you think i would bus as scum here?

I think it was intended as a back up because you were confident you could get me hammered.

what does this mean? can you just answer my questions? wit yes or no

In post 511, JamesTheNames wrote:

In post 495, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 491, JamesTheNames wrote:

In post 488, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 487, JamesTheNames wrote:

In post 486, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 484, JamesTheNames wrote:Explain your unvote. I'm curious.

im just thinking rn

Thinking what?

u think t3 is possible more liable to be my scumpartner than val?

t3 the person who i scumread?

do you think i would bus as scum here?

I think it was intended as a back up because you were confident you could get me hammered.

what does this mean? can you just answer my questions? wit yes or no

It means exactly what it says, it isn't that complicated. Spam posting the same thing for hundreds of posts doesn't make you town. Self meta to the extent you do it is scummy. You have no actual case against me that I haven't brought up. You unvote with no explanation.
You're scum. We go into Day 2 1 scum down.

???

In post 705, GrandpaMo wrote:do you see how james is flipping the narrative now to include answers that was before the question that was never in their intitial response???

Person A-My favourite colour is yellow
Person B-Person A what is your favourite colour?
Person A-
Person B-?
Person A-
Person B-Scum!
Person A-
Person B-SCUM!
Person A-
Person B-SCUMM!!!!!
Person A-I told you already
Person B-No you didn't
Person A-Look I said yellow
Person B-No you're twisting the narrative with an answer before the question

In post 706, JamesTheNames wrote:

In post 703, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 699, JamesTheNames wrote:

In post 697, Val89 wrote:

In post 681, JamesTheNames wrote:337 is 134 less than 571, and 491 is 80 less.

The maths is absolutely spot on, but that only matters if you did in fact answer the question in #491.

You didn't. I've pointed this out, Grandpa pointed this out,Alstro pointed this out. Now, all 3 of us can't be scum, can we?

In post 337, JamesTheNames wrote:Ergo probably T3.

THAT IS WAY BEFORE MY QUESTION??

WHICH U NEVER BROUGHT UP IN UR FIRST RESPONSE

You asked me questions which already have been answered, I keep saying I've answered them, I've proven I've answered them, you keep going on about absolutely nonsense.

its not about you answering it.

its how you went about it. look you aren't understanding.

first I ask you the question, then you asnwer to only ONE of my question with something about backing down as hammer or what. then i told you to answer with yes or no since that is what the question asked for. then you never answered that + the original second question until alstro pointed up and this time you added a new narrative that you already answered this? yes you have but you never answered the question directly, you instead said you answered it in post 331 which is around 100 posts way before I asked that question -- which is impossible for you to say and therefore a fallacy for you to state that. yes that is true, you did answer my question -- but it feels like you are manipulating the siltation where you had to change the narrative after you found out you already answered it before.

it didn't come into question until val / alstro brought it up.

heck, you haven't answered my 2nd question until the pressure brought on. you keep saying you said it for your answer but you didn't, you could probably have used that as your evidence or support your reasoning but that's not what you did -- instead you used that as your full on answer that you already have said the answer way before the question.

it just seems like a lot of wishwashy inconsistent bs.

In post 708, JamesTheNames wrote:

In post 705, GrandpaMo wrote:do you see how james is flipping the narrative now to include answers that was before the question that was never in their intitial response???

Person A-My favourite colour is yellow
Person B-Person A what is your favourite colour?
Person A-
Person B-?
Person A-
Person B-Scum!
Person A-
Person B-SCUM!
Person A-
Person B-SCUMM!!!!!
Person A-I told you already
Person B-No you didn't
Person A-Look I said yellow
Person B-No you're twisting the narrative with an answer before the question

In post 709, GrandpaMo wrote:it just seems like a lot of wishwashy inconsistent bs.

In post 708, JamesTheNames wrote:

In post 705, GrandpaMo wrote:do you see how james is flipping the narrative now to include answers that was before the question that was never in their intitial response???

Person A-My favourite colour is yellow
Person B-Person A what is your favourite colour?
Person A-
Person B-?
Person A-
Person B-Scum!
Person A-
Person B-SCUM!
Person A-
Person B-SCUMM!!!!!
Person A-I told you already
Person B-No you didn't
Person A-Look I said yellow
Person B-No you're twisting the narrative with an answer before the question

lol thats not what happened and it feels like ur over exaggerating it

its more like

person a - person b is scum and their partner is x
person b - why do you think my partner is and do you think i am scum with x
person a - if they would have done that, then they are scum with you
person b - can you answer?
person a -
person b - hello?
person a -
person b -
person a - yea vfp, x is scum
person b - can you answer
person c - can you answer
person d - can you answer
person a - okay giv me a sec
person b - so again why do you think my partner is and do you think i am scum with x
person a - i said giv me a sec
person b -
person a - yes and ur partner is possibly t3; i already answered this a while back
person b - ok cool
person a - i already answered this question already
person b - now you did
person a - no, i gave u a post that answered ur question a while ago so technically it counts
person b - no it doesnt

oh forgot to include

**based on a true story**


kekw

yk wat

james i think ur town

and val ur scum just pocketing me

and vfp is scum too

i think in an alternate universave vfp + val is the scum group

val gets on vfp how vfp takes advantage of this bw

and vfp follows this plan

val's plan 2nd day is to bus vfp for this reason because ima flip town.

after that -- val gets towncred and probably won't be looked at until day 3.

alstro will be in the final 3.

woop woop!!

could it be true that you were doing this just to set me up? why?

do you think that i would be following along with your plan? after all you might be town -- but it will take a long stake at hold. i will be hammered once zyla comes back unfortuntatly. and town will see this lost. vfp will flip scum and eventually get ruled out with the options of NEE. look at how NEE started at zyla my intitial scumread -- then turns to me once the wagon hit.

james is town afterall. this whole thing was an act. an act that got wasted by humility.

you are right @val. this was a town v town scenerio hence why i asked alstro and their thoughts on the sitatuion. could it be that it could be replicating me and JacksonVirgo's and my first newbie game but my frustration and egotistical overconfidence led me to the point where I am town in Virgo's eyes? could it be that James could be following the same thing -- once I laid back everything was quiet between us. But it was too late and I sincerely apologize.

But val you are so wrong and you know it.

You are outright scum. I just know it. Just look at the everything you have followed suit? Did you overcome yourself to seem towny? Like look at me asking the very simple question of you being scum and look at zyla being overly excited. I don't think it may seem excessive? Could it be?

There is a world where you are scum with VFP but once I scumread VFP -- will it be an omgus, is that why I am scumreading you more than VFP right now? It is up to you to decipher that as town.

You failed. And I hope town sees this day 2 after I flip masons with T3.

Unfortunately, that isn't my real claim -- I am just saying this so possible I can openwolf my way out of a hammer and it may or may not happen. T3, could you possibly claim masons with me? Because you won't be voted today. And like I said -- you are one of the one's + cooks, and vfp's alignment's gets solved by tomorrow and VFP is probably the vote tomorrow and town will eventually lose if alstro / val is scum only if VFP flips town somehow and is not scum with Val.

VOTE: Va89l

There is also a world with Cook + Zyla could be scum. There early interactions allign way better than James + Zyla.

You set this shit up for yourself @Val

To make you look town.

You know I am flipping town -- therefore you push for a vote on James while half of town pushes on VFP. The question is who wins in that battle?

Are you claiming Mason or no?

In post 57, VFP wrote:Grampa likes to pocket me as scum for the record.
He knows that my only weakness is compliments and calling me town!

It may be too late for me, but you all have to stop... gnnnnhr

Grampa is looking town so far.

Zyla maybe town, I don't see anything scum motivated to point out the no lim and as an experienced player probably just isn't used to this.
T3 has a T3 town start so we'll see.

Thats 3 pages, 3 reads! A read per page!

In post 7, VFP wrote:Hi, I'm VFP and I have never played with anyone in this player list.

VOTE: No lim

How could I forget about this...

I didn't mean to quote the second person... Am I doing this to you VFP?

Oh fuck. I am.

This is why you scumread me, isn't it.

But I haven't played with me!scum have I?

You said yourself, so how would this be true?

In post 719, Val89 wrote:Are you claiming Mason or no?

Are you claiming scum?

Also no, I will be claiming cop with a night zero guilty check on James. They aren't scum though.

You are.

I'll be honest, I don't consider fake claiming, semi-fake claiming or whatever it is you are trying to do here as town behaviour. Are you walking back your VT claim or not?