Mafiascum.net

In post 687, T3 wrote:VOTE: lld
This feels similar to Yggdrasil when LLD was scum in the sense that she's trying to control the game. I disagree with her James read and she's trying to pocket hockey.

Atleast let her catch up.
You can't complain that the game is slow or whatever then jump on someone for pushing it forward.

In post 696, HockeyFan wrote:T3, what are u doing. You are attempting to read someone based off of meta alone. Why not do this wiith some of the other game? Why is LLD an exception?

Because T3 is scum!

In post 678, HockeyFan wrote:Fwiw I didnt think gpas reaction felt that unnatural but a gpa vote is smth I can get behind.

ok pog u scumread me in the beginning, decide to sheep me, then now you wanna vote me

k cool

also im not active in the game no more, cuz i have been vested my self in voice games and hosting them a lot more often, this game also died down, and im still waiting to hear from my scumread, strangematter's slot.


and they have yet to talk so....


ill just keep lurking ig

In post 680, JamesTheNames wrote:If I survive D1 I'm so dead N1...

blame t3

i will probably be more active day 2 if im alive by then , i hope so cuz i could have enjoyed this game, but this game has been different than all the games i have played so far

In post 701, VFP wrote:

In post 696, HockeyFan wrote:T3, what are u doing. You are attempting to read someone based off of meta alone. Why not do this wiith some of the other game? Why is LLD an exception?

Because T3 is scum!

pog vfp good read

In post 702, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 678, HockeyFan wrote:Fwiw I didnt think gpas reaction felt that unnatural but a gpa vote is smth I can get behind.

ok pog u scumread me in the beginning, decide to sheep me, then now you wanna vote me

k cool

Gpa we've been over this. Just because i had similar reads to u does not mean i was sheeping u. My reads had no influence based off of your reads

In post 696, HockeyFan wrote:T3, what are u doing. You are attempting to read someone based off of meta alone. Why not do this wiith some of the other game? Why is LLD an exception?

1. That's wrong.
2. This is a newbie.
3. LLD has a lot of meta I can look at.

In post 706, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 701, VFP wrote:

In post 696, HockeyFan wrote:T3, what are u doing. You are attempting to read someone based off of meta alone. Why not do this wiith some of the other game? Why is LLD an exception?

Because T3 is scum!

pog vfp good read

In post 702, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 678, HockeyFan wrote:Fwiw I didnt think gpas reaction felt that unnatural but a gpa vote is smth I can get behind.

ok pog u scumread me in the beginning, decide to sheep me, then now you wanna vote me

k cool

Gpa we've been over this. Just because i had similar reads to u does not mean i was sheeping u. My reads had no influence based off of your reads

Grandpa's Reads ©2021

In post 707, T3 wrote:

In post 696, HockeyFan wrote:T3, what are u doing. You are attempting to read someone based off of meta alone. Why not do this wiith some of the other game? Why is LLD an exception?

1. That's wrong.

2. This is a newbie.
3. LLD has a lot of meta I can look at.

Shouldn't newbies be to get a grip on mechanics and common things rather than learning to rely on meta?

In post 709, JamesTheNames wrote:

In post 707, T3 wrote:

In post 696, HockeyFan wrote:T3, what are u doing. You are attempting to read someone based off of meta alone. Why not do this wiith some of the other game? Why is LLD an exception?

1. That's wrong.

2. This is a newbie.
3. LLD has a lot of meta I can look at.

Shouldn't newbies be to get a grip on mechanics and common things rather than learning to rely on meta?

bruh.jpg

So, first of all, hello. Secondly, I think I'm ok with a T3 vs VFP. I agree that the lack of votes is weird, and I can see it as a stall tactic. I'm also trying to decipher which posts are flail and which posts are attention-seeking for the sake of entertainment. What do you think?

VOTE: VFP

In post 678, HockeyFan wrote:Fwiw I didnt think gpas reaction felt that unnatural but a gpa vote is smth I can get behind. Idk if you didnt quite see cows's soft defending of VFP in the last few posts(479,503) Partially 51.

To each their own. It just jumped out to me as a possibility.
You SR'ed Grandpa at time of argument, in 368 you say you think they're town, now you're fine with a potential vote on them - what's your case for them rn?

In post 678, HockeyFan wrote:So yea I do think cows hasn't necessarily hard defended VFP but certainly discredited the VFP push(that both me and Gpa made). It has indeed died down, and idk if thats cuz of Gpa's inactivity but just a thing to point out.

I get it. I just think VFP's being too deliberately laid back, and self-aware with it. It isn't fair to assume they're town because of this, but y'know... it just doesn't feel like he's bothered about being the elim here. On the other hand I'm not gonna deny hammering VFP either if he's the consensus wagon at EoD but my thoughts on them are the same. I'm aware you and GPA have pushed/voted him.

In post 678, HockeyFan wrote:You're putting too much stock into meta in your T3 read imo. Like this game specifically sure he has done smth, but any other person would be called scum by the way hes playing.

Understandable. I know I need many, MANY games with said person to even justify using meta effectively. I don't mind giving context to D1 reads even if they're kinda flawed & lackluster - something good may come from it, discussion-wise.

In post 678, HockeyFan wrote:Also can u explain to me how Bulge "not looking anywhere else" is scum? This game has had like 10 replacements so i really dont think thats an issue.

This I'll own up to - 'not looking anywhere else' was disingenuous of me to say, given they were waiting for slots to speak/replace out. I'll look back and let you know if my thoughts change on the slot.

Also I'm more null than town lean let's be honest - I've barely posted/interacted with anyone so.
Thanks, though.

Why do we have a 2009 and a 2010 in a newbie?

In post 713, JamesTheNames wrote:Why do we have a 2009 and a 2010 in a newbie?

they are 1000% percent here to pubstomp after being dormant. that's the only explanation i can accept

I am a T3 meta expert.
T3 is scum!

In post 713, JamesTheNames wrote:Why do we have a 2009 and a 2010 in a newbie?

In post 714, cowsloveSushirolls wrote:

In post 713, JamesTheNames wrote:Why do we have a 2009 and a 2010 in a newbie?

they are 1000% percent here to pubstomp after being dormant. that's the only explanation i can accept

SE slots are meant for experienced players to pass along their experience to newbies and aid them in developing their skill.

Additionally, I'm a replace in as a favour to the mod, who is my friend. It can be hard to find SE replacements for a newbie, so.

this entire VFP vs T3 thing is about meta and i find it annoying that neither case is particularly convincing
if forced to pick a side right now i vote against T3 for their sudden shift in behavior which i'm fairly certain is flailing

In post 711, Looker wrote:So, first of all, hello. Secondly, I think I'm ok with a T3 vs VFP. I agree that the lack of votes is weird, and I can see it as a stall tactic. I'm also trying to decipher which posts are flail and which posts are attention-seeking for the sake of entertainment. What do you think?

VOTE: VFP

I think you should have reads on more players then just the 2 being pushed rn(if you're still reading up, thats fine)

In post 712, Clasko wrote:

In post 678, HockeyFan wrote:Fwiw I didnt think gpas reaction felt that unnatural but a gpa vote is smth I can get behind. Idk if you didnt quite see cows's soft defending of VFP in the last few posts(479,503) Partially 51.

To each their own. It just jumped out to me as a possibility.
You SR'ed Grandpa at time of argument, in 368 you say you think they're town, now you're fine with a potential vote on them - what's your case for them rn?

I mainly tr'd them so I wouldnt be tunneling them forever. I still think they're null to weak scum but leaning more null rn

In post 716, VFP wrote:I am a T3 meta expert.
T3 is scum!

omg VFP u gonna talk about anything other than t3??

Also regarding this whole VFP/T3 thing thats happneing rn, I think we should shift away a little from it since atm 80% of the players think one of them is scum so if they're both town, uhh we're kinda fucked

Metadecentmostofthetime.

In post 719, HockeyFan wrote:I mainly tr'd them so I wouldnt be tunneling them forever. I still think they're null to weak scum but leaning more null rn

if scum they've chosen a weird hill to die on

I only flail as scum
Looker doesn't exist.
VFP is a consensus scumread.
LLD is kind of weirdly null.
cows is probably town.
hockey scum.
Grandpa and James I will not disclose.

et

allez