Mafiascum.net

In post 632, Salsabil Faria wrote:

Now, read list in no particular order....

Grandpa

HF

marci

sb9

Kop

GE

Galron

Titus

STD

Roden

DGb

T3

I don’t really like those reads

In post 634, Salsabil Faria wrote:

Will afk now...

Why’d you have to point this out? That’s feels kinda sus

In post 647, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 635, Titus wrote:How is 460 a joke? Why would a joke be scummy while a serious post is ok/forgettable?

Wait, I messed up 460 with 461, the later post was joke to me, 460 wasn’t a joke. I payed with

Roden

in another mini where they caught the deepwolf in Day 1 and night killed at Night 2 because of that. I'm not sensing that fierce

Roden

here, feels they're acting like cautious scum, thus I think that particular post is scummy.
And what I said about 236 stays.

I’ve seen scum Roden and I don’t think this is really it

In post 670, superbowl9 wrote:naked reads are not content

For DGB they are

That’s not being rude, I’m just saying it trends toward the lazier side

^^my point exactly

Okay, we should be voting people just because they have a lazy playstyle

Like I'm not gonna push a policy on it, but do I feel comfortable with that in eylo? No I do not. So I'd rather get things moving sooner rather than later on that slot, letting it sit around and hoping it sorts itself is not going to happen

In post 707, Gamma Emerald wrote:Okay, we should be voting people just because they have a lazy playstyle

This philosophy loses games
Either you think we're 10D 500iq and can sort a slot off of no productive content, or we need to do something to make them produce content

its better to sort out troubleslots sooner rather than later yeah,
but i really dont think today is the day we should be seeking to do this.

we can use our votes in a better way; if we all just agree "ahah policy useless player" i feel like that'll limit our flow of info a bit, and scum could choose their kill in a way that leaves us completely clueless d2.

VOTE: Gpamo

Someone that has imo been going a bit under the radar and has used to not make that much quality posts. He hasnt attempted to make a push, and is also not in my towncore.

I think im good with keeping my vote here for now.

oh right, i was already voting him LOL

In post 665, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 663, T3 wrote:

In post 661, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 645, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 638, superbowl9 wrote:^We might as well get rid of this slot if this is all of the content it's gonna produce

In post 641, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 639, marcistar wrote:

In post 638, superbowl9 wrote:^We might as well get rid of this slot if this is all of the content it's gonna produce

do u scumread them at all

Nope

btw wtf is this sequence lol. I dont think theres anythign wrong with DGB giving blanket reads

I dont think so either but if that's your entire content you need to go

Dunno man, what if we have DGB as an IC by meta who we don't eliminate.

That makes no sense because when you get to eylo and have clueless town that's not posting how do you expect to win?

"Clueless town that's not posting"
???

In post 671, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 664, T3 wrote:

In post 660, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 645, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 638, superbowl9 wrote:^We might as well get rid of this slot if this is all of the content it's gonna produce

In post 641, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 639, marcistar wrote:

In post 638, superbowl9 wrote:^We might as well get rid of this slot if this is all of the content it's gonna produce

do u scumread them at all

Nope

btw wtf is this sequence lol. I dont think theres anythign wrong with DGB giving blanket reads

Can you read

DGb

?

I can. (she's town)

t3 who do u sr, u've trd like 8 ppl

I'm bad at this game and also I prefer the style of townhunting, forming a PoE, ram through the PoE, so on.

In post 692, Roden wrote:

In post 687, marcistar wrote:

In post 685, Roden wrote:I don't seem aggressive because there's really not much to attack this game. There's no big personalities, no spicy takes, no town leaders, and nearly all the scum reads coming from everyone feel half-hearted.

:shrug:
maybe u should try to do something and become the townleader then... or do u like this gamestate rn..?

I don't think I'd be a good town leader due to my role.

Btw I guess I should probably say now that this game might be weighted towards scum, or at least set up in a way to give them a favorable end game. I say this due to the info my role provides + the current game state having little to no leads on scum.

LOCKTOWN

In post 697, marcistar wrote:

In post 696, superbowl9 wrote:pedit: apparently softing D1 for no reason is cool now???

i was trying to think about this but im so confused.. the biggest flag is "i cant be a townleader because of my role" seems like bs to me LOL... just seems a bit of an excuse so he could continue to slide by being inactive.
it isn't cool at all, but im not sure how to proceed...

Nah.

Normally, I wouldn't like Roden's post but I kinda do atm. Why is a mystery?

I don't think HockeyFan plays the game this why if scum with SF.

That leaves me with a conundrum as one of them should be scum with SF as the posting doesn't make sense.

In post 717, Titus wrote:Normally, I wouldn't like Roden's post but I kinda do atm. Why is a mystery?

I don't think HockeyFan plays the game this why if scum with SF.

That leaves me with a conundrum as one of them should be scum with SF as the posting doesn't make sense.

What if... all 3 of us are town? I dont see why u think SF must be paired with one of us. Like what in her posting implies that? Sf's recent readslist had me as town and Roden as scum. Do you think scum!Sf puts either of thier partners in T/S. wouldnt they want to put them in null?

In post 716, T3 wrote:

In post 697, marcistar wrote:

In post 696, superbowl9 wrote:pedit: apparently softing D1 for no reason is cool now???

i was trying to think about this but im so confused.. the biggest flag is "i cant be a townleader because of my role" seems like bs to me LOL... just seems a bit of an excuse so he could continue to slide by being inactive.
it isn't cool at all, but im not sure how to proceed...

Nah.

Scum don't do that.

This is valid

In post 710, marcistar wrote:its better to sort out troubleslots sooner rather than later yeah,
but i really dont think today is the day we should be seeking to do this.

we can use our votes in a better way; if we all just agree "ahah policy useless player" i feel like that'll limit our flow of info a bit, and scum could choose their kill in a way that leaves us completely clueless d2.

Yes which is why I'm not pushing a policy....

In post 713, T3 wrote:"Clueless town that's not posting"
???

Scum works too, but I think you can figure out on your own why that's bad for us.

In post 716, T3 wrote:

In post 697, marcistar wrote:

In post 696, superbowl9 wrote:pedit: apparently softing D1 for no reason is cool now???

i was trying to think about this but im so confused.. the biggest flag is "i cant be a townleader because of my role" seems like bs to me LOL... just seems a bit of an excuse so he could continue to slide by being inactive.
it isn't cool at all, but im not sure how to proceed...

Nah.

Scum don't do that.

Absolutely false and do not try to convince people that this is the case

In post 719, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 716, T3 wrote:

In post 697, marcistar wrote:

In post 696, superbowl9 wrote:pedit: apparently softing D1 for no reason is cool now???

i was trying to think about this but im so confused.. the biggest flag is "i cant be a townleader because of my role" seems like bs to me LOL... just seems a bit of an excuse so he could continue to slide by being inactive.
it isn't cool at all, but im not sure how to proceed...

Nah.

Scum don't do that.

This is valid

We can't seem to agree this game can we

In post 722, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 716, T3 wrote:

In post 697, marcistar wrote:

In post 696, superbowl9 wrote:pedit: apparently softing D1 for no reason is cool now???

i was trying to think about this but im so confused.. the biggest flag is "i cant be a townleader because of my role" seems like bs to me LOL... just seems a bit of an excuse so he could continue to slide by being inactive.
it isn't cool at all, but im not sure how to proceed...

Nah.

Scum don't do that.

Absolutely false and do not try to convince people that this is the case

Pretty much all the time when I've seen someone openly claim PR on day 1 without any reason they have been town.