Mafiascum.net

In post 652, Color Green wrote:

In post 650, Color Blue wrote:It's certainly very bold!

Probably because there's a gap the size of the marinas trench between red and everyone above them!

The sooner we pair up the sooner I can murder heart and then red!

In post 691, Color Blue wrote:

In post 665, Pentagon Shape wrote:It is interesting to have Triangle that high on one’s list yet not want to pair with them.

but then again

have you met Triangle?

In post 683, Color Orange wrote:

In post 652, Color Green wrote:

In post 650, Color Blue wrote:It's certainly very bold!

Probably because there's a gap the size of the marinas trench between red and everyone above them!

The sooner we pair up the sooner I can murder heart and then red!

Why on earth would Heart be first, if you proclaim such a gap to exist in your reads?

In post 704, Color Green wrote:Reading is clearly too hard for some of you.

Everyone else
Literal ocean trench
Red
Smaller gap
Heart

I'm at least a little shocked nobody else sees the glaring perspective slip from heart....

In post 705, Color Purple wrote:

In post 704, Color Green wrote:Reading is clearly too hard for some of you.

Everyone else
Literal ocean trench
Red
Smaller gap
Heart

I'm at least a little shocked nobody else sees the glaring perspective slip from heart....

Is it 608 or am I wrong?

In post 573, Heart Shape wrote:I admit I didn't read every word but I didn't get much out of ORange v Pentagon

other than the obvious they're not TvS.

In post 19, Color Red wrote:

In post 13, Circle Shape wrote:if someone pairs with a scummy scumfuck who is obvious that doesnt mean you should lim them because of prs or whatever

It should be noted that partnering with a scummy scumfuck still allows the you to essentially Roleblock the PR since both parties must agree to use the ability.

In regards to pairing, I want to be picky with my partner. As a modifier, I feel it's my right to be so since powers need me and not the other way around.

In post 20, Color Yellow wrote:Ideally we would leave scum out of the pairs. Having a delayed PR is bad, but denying scum a PR is worth the tradeoff imo.

In post 21, Color Yellow wrote:

In post 7, Color Purple wrote:And a question to all, what do you think of players who have unusual posting patterns? For example, posting near midnight, writing in an unorderly fashion, you name it.

Picking out midnight posting is very strange to me; we don't know anyone's schedules or timezones, so how would we even judge something like that? Why would it matter even if we could?

In post 503, Circle Shape wrote:also power + modifier corresponding to color + shape was incredibly obvious based on the rules and signup and didnt take asking the mod

the fact that triangle is continuing to push that argument is way way worse than using the info from a mainslip post and has me raising an eyebrow

In post 710, Triangle Shape wrote:

In post 503, Circle Shape wrote:also power + modifier corresponding to color + shape was incredibly obvious based on the rules and signup and didnt take asking the mod

the fact that triangle is continuing to push that argument is way way worse than using the info from a mainslip post and has me raising an eyebrow

a nw chllngr apprchs.

In post 708, Color Green wrote:

In post 573, Heart Shape wrote:I admit I didn't read every word but I didn't get much out of ORange v Pentagon

other than the obvious they're not TvS.

This then gets immediately dropped but...

A: How is that "obvious"
B: If you're ruling T-S out somehow, why not do partner analysis to sort between S-S/T-T?

It's a throwaway statement that shows a mindset of not actually caring, and I'm gonna bet that it's because they're T-T but subconsciously Heart avoided closing the door entirely with a committed read.

In post 582, Color Blue wrote:it is taking tremendous willpower for me to not post in this thread as much as I want to

I am really excited to get the PT so i can post to my hearts content.

I think Orange and Diamond would be a good match, even though I think Diamond is less likely town than Triangle, I am not sure Triangle will ever be productive to talk to in a PT.

It is kind of weird to me that Green would rather have Orange pair with Diamond than pair with Diamond himself if he thinks Diamond is a good pairing.

In post 645, Star Shape wrote:

In post 320, Pentagon Shape wrote:

In post 278, Color Purple wrote:And Triangle, don't take this badly. I am not asking you to be like Yellow, but avoid using people's names and avatars as reasons why they are scum.

They’re obviously trolling with that. lol

So here's the thing: I don't trust trolls. They're too much of a liability and if I don't come up with a slot that feels more scum, I would want to push tri anyway

then again I'm only skimming tonight so I don't have anything real yet to produce.

In post 711, Color Blue wrote:Triangle please pair with Orange so we can move on to the next part of the game?

Thanks

In post 713, Pentagon Shape wrote:

In post 710, Triangle Shape wrote:

In post 503, Circle Shape wrote:also power + modifier corresponding to color + shape was incredibly obvious based on the rules and signup and didnt take asking the mod

the fact that triangle is continuing to push that argument is way way worse than using the info from a mainslip post and has me raising an eyebrow

a nw chllngr apprchs.

Are you seriously going to sr anyone who even remotely criticizes your play, regardless of the validity of their point? There is absolutely nothing remotely scummy about Circle’s post. You are disregarding valid information because it doesn’t fit with your solve.

In post 716, Triangle Shape wrote:

In post 645, Star Shape wrote:

In post 320, Pentagon Shape wrote:

In post 278, Color Purple wrote:And Triangle, don't take this badly. I am not asking you to be like Yellow, but avoid using people's names and avatars as reasons why they are scum.

They’re obviously trolling with that. lol

So here's the thing: I don't trust trolls. They're too much of a liability and if I don't come up with a slot that feels more scum, I would want to push tri anyway

then again I'm only skimming tonight so I don't have anything real yet to produce.

lol omgus cnfrmd.

In post 718, Triangle Shape wrote:

In post 713, Pentagon Shape wrote:

In post 710, Triangle Shape wrote:

In post 503, Circle Shape wrote:also power + modifier corresponding to color + shape was incredibly obvious based on the rules and signup and didnt take asking the mod

the fact that triangle is continuing to push that argument is way way worse than using the info from a mainslip post and has me raising an eyebrow

a nw chllngr apprchs.

Are you seriously going to sr anyone who even remotely criticizes your play, regardless of the validity of their point? There is absolutely nothing remotely scummy about Circle’s post. You are disregarding valid information because it doesn’t fit with your solve.

intrstin reactin.
i nvr sd thy were a scmrd. jst a nw chllngr apprchd.