Mafiascum.net

In post 654, Save The Dragons wrote:I feel like you're so dodgy you should be scumreading yourself frogsterking

How about actually responding to me instead of saying bullshit

In post 643, Save The Dragons wrote:
your case is wishy washy, all over the place, and untrue. it feels like you decided i'm scum and are just coming up with more and more reasons to pigeonhole me into this mindset. i think you've confirmbiased yourself and need to reset and actually consider what's been put out vs. decided i'm low content and therefore must be scum.

i don't know why you think i'm dodgy, i don't think i've been dodgy at all. i've given my reads my way and have been pretty clear about them.

most of this post is blustering and not an actual case and i'm not sure what you're hoping to gain from this, it almost seems like you're being dodgy especially since someone asked you a question about me and you get distracted by someone else

In post 649, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 638, Enchant wrote:So, who we killing and why

Dragons please, scum slot IMO

In post 702, Cape90 wrote:UNVOTE: MalcomTucker

My phone says Malcolm's catch up posts are decent

In post 708, Greeting wrote:

In post 702, Cape90 wrote:UNVOTE: MalcomTucker

My phone says Malcolm's catch up posts are decent

I agree to be fair. They remind me of his downplay in general. I'm leaving

MalcomTucker

for the time being.

In post 709, Greeting wrote:Though

Frog

kinda has a point, the Crescent/

BCG

slot is bad and we might need to just policy elim them.

In post 704, Big Chungus Gaming wrote:charloux and std are town

Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 704, Big Chungus Gaming wrote:charloux and std are town

ur bad

In post 696, Frogsterking wrote:Marci do you still scum read Malcolm?

In post 705, Charloux wrote:I admit my mistake. A true fencesitter should never, under any circumstances offer his opinion and only post fluff. Maybe a naked vote with no reasoning or context?

VOTE: Dragons

Now excuse me, need to eat some enslaved potasium.

In post 693, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 652, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 643, Save The Dragons wrote:why would you attribute that motivation to me being scum?

It's monologuing and parallel communication. Gives you time to double check everything you say and doesn't force you to interact with other players. It makes your slot appear more Townie on a reread than it should and is a very common scum tactic.

Basically this:

In post 646, Enchant wrote:Imagine catching up only to discover there's 3+ pages which you also need to catch up.

Therefore catching up is pointless exertise.

Enchant may have been joking but that's the vibe I'm getting from your slot. Game isn't moving fast either, so I think all the drama over catching up is just theater.

VOTE: Save the Dragons
Yeah this seals it for me
The points about monologuing and parallel communication is a very succinct way of expressing a trend I feel like scum players fall into sometimes.
I was already probably voting here anyway, this just makes me feel fine voting now vs. waiting until finishing reading

In post 697, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 668, Save The Dragons wrote:

In post 665, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 663, Save The Dragons wrote:

In post 661, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 658, Save The Dragons wrote:Not really I made like 10 arguments and you barely barely articulated one

Were any of them good though?

Yes

Try harder

I think you just randomly drew my name out of a hat and decided to double down on it and anyone who thinks you have a case is an idiot no offense

I reread and they weren't good. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man straw man fallacy, you're straw manning my case against you.

Also you claimed low activity != scum but there is evidence that there's a correlation. https://www.researchgate.net/publicatio ... _Detection MathBlade made a similar objection (and later flipped scum) when I accused him D1 in the large theme you just modded.

I am not strawmanning you if anything you are strawmanning me by picking and choosing what part of my case is important and what part of my case is just vaguely beneath you.

I still can't believe you are doubling down on me having work as me being scum.

Mathblade was low activity because he was sick not because he was scum

The thing is there is a way busy scum tend to play and it’s unfortunate to get called on it but it’s a real trend

In post 705, Charloux wrote:I admit my mistake. A true fencesitter should never, under any circumstances offer his opinion and only post fluff. Maybe a naked vote with no reasoning or context?

VOTE: Dragons

Now excuse me, need to eat some enslaved potasium.