Page 29 of 51
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 3:34 am
by armlx
Didn't Tar say something similar and turn out town? (Yes, he did.)
Yes, and there was a reason he was blown up for it. 1st off, layers and layers of WIFOM. Second, suicidal people are rarely mafia kills.
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 3:55 am
by M4yhem
Surely the second point is an arguement for not lynching suicidals?
I concede the first point.
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 4:12 am
by forbiddanlight
Surely the second point is an arguement for not lynching suicidals?
I concede the first point.
Eventually it will be if we give too many free passes. Unfortunately, if we don't, we just kill townies, so...if you are town, stop being stupid, and if you are scum, please be suicidal. That's my stance, anywho.
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 4:22 am
by armlx
M4yh3m, the suicidal people can only have their alignment revealed via a lynch, regardless of how pro-town/anti-town their actions are. Now, what other group in this game falls under the same circumstances, and how can we reasonably distinguish the two while someone is acting that way?
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 5:31 am
by M4yhem
The whole town falls under that description, surely, unless they get the bomb?
As for distinguishing the two, I'd say go by behavior, except that K7 barely talks anyway. I don't like the 'we have to lynch someone who says x' mentality though. Townies say stupid things quite often, we can't kill them all.
K7- Who do you think is scum at the moment and how come? And do you really want to die?
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 5:51 am
by armlx
The whole town falls under that description, surely, unless they get the bomb?
Actually, the option I was going for is mafia. The rest of the towncan have their role revealed by the "mafia NK" aka bomb.
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 6:21 am
by Max
armlx has a point, *shocked*, but I would say that we can't classify everyone into one box based on actions - but only a foolish member of the mafia would do something that got that reaction, pondering.
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 6:24 am
by armlx
but only a foolish member of the mafia would do something that got that reaction, pondering.
WIFOM.
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 6:27 am
by armlx
EBWODP: To be fair, odds are that scenario would apply to K7 all game anyways. Also, now would probably be a better time to deal with people who are acting scummy in other ways to gain more info. He has to die by lynch at a later point however.
Also, what differentiates him from tar is tar used it as a defense to a larger attack.
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 7:02 am
by Battousai
What we should do is kill anyone who asks to be killed. If they are town, then good job, you're sabotaging the game. If they're mafia, then they're dead. This is similar to lynch all lurkers. If you make it a rule, lurkers would stop lurking to avoid being killed. Same thing goes for suicidal players.
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 7:12 am
by Crazy
Battousai wrote:What we should do is kill anyone who asks to be killed. If they are town, then good job, you're sabotaging the game. If they're mafia, then they're dead. This is similar to lynch all lurkers. If you make it a rule, lurkers would stop lurking to avoid being killed. Same thing goes for suicidal players.
No, you don't kill him. You tell him, "Post content or prepare to be killed." If K7 doesn't actually play this game, then yes, he's a problem, because he would be useless to the town and there's very little chance he'd ever get a bomb. In that case, it would probably be beneficial to blow him up.
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 9:00 am
by Battousai
That's what I meant, like you give lurkers a warning, you give suicidals a warning. I meant it to be the same process as lynch all lurkers.
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 9:08 am
by M4yhem
We already gave suicidals a warning when we got Tar exploded. K7 obviously has no capacity to learn (or he doesn't care).
Unvote, Vote: Battousai
because I hate the idea of killing townies automatically for saying something which may just be a joke. Seems a good way for scum to get innocents killed, there's even a ready made excuse when they flip town: 'oh, he asked for it.'
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 9:09 am
by armlx
Back track within 2 posts = fun.
Oh wait, vote is already there.
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 9:41 am
by Crazy
M4yhem wrote:We already gave suicidals a warning when we got Tar exploded. K7 obviously has no capacity to learn (or he doesn't care).
Unvote, Vote: Battousai
because I hate the idea of killing townies automatically for saying something which may just be a joke. Seems a good way for scum to get innocents killed, there's even a ready made excuse when they flip town: 'oh, he asked for it.'
Coming from the LAL person, this is hypocritical.
Unvote
Vote M4yhem
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 9:44 am
by M4yhem
I don't see why. There's a difference between lynching people for not scumhunting or providing content and lynching people for making jokes.
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 9:46 am
by TDC
Battousai (3) : armlx, Battousai, M4yhem
Iron Man (2): forbiddanlight, Iron Man
alvinz95 (2) : Max, Battle Mage
DragonsofSummer (2) : DragonsofSummer, the silent speaker
armlx (2) : Twomz, Haschel Cedricson
the silent speaker (1) : Coron
Max (1) : alvinz95
M4yhem (1) : Crazy
self voting and only self voted (3): Pokerface, killa seven, Jex
Still 6 self-votes.
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 9:47 am
by Crazy
M4yhem wrote:I don't see why. There's a difference between lynching people for not scumhunting or providing content and lynching people for making jokes.
Hmm, good point.
Batt, if K7 was regularly scum-hunting, would you be of the same opinion that you are now?
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 10:01 am
by TDC
On second thought, this will take forever, so I'll give you a deadline-with-a-twist:
Each week I'll remove as many players as possible from the bottom of the vote count, so that the "advancing" players still have a majority of votes shared on them. (Tied players will only be removed/advanced together).
Right now this would mean that Battousai, Iron Man, alvinz95, DragonsofSummer and armlx would advance (11 votes combined). I'll bold the currently advancing players in the upcoming vote counts.
Obviously if only one player would advance, he's the lynch anyway.
Deadline #1 will be Thursday the 25th 23:00 CET (which is in exactly 8 days).
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 10:06 am
by armlx
That seems dumb and restrictive.
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 10:06 am
by Crazy
Lol, TDC's making his own game.
I'll
Unvote, Revote Iron Man
if that's the case, because M4yhem owned that question.
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 10:13 am
by TDC
armlx wrote:That seems dumb and restrictive.
Less restrictive than a normal deadline.
More restrictive than waiting a month, sure.
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 10:15 am
by killa seven
M4yhem wrote:
K7- Who do you think is scum at the moment and how come? And do you really want to die?
If i had the bomb i would probably Blow up Batt.
I thought this game would be more of blow up fest, and i exspected to get the bomb by now.
I dont like the whole argument that we should kill k7 because the scum wont and he will be around later, the point is to blow up scum, if you think im scum blow me up, if you think im just unhelpfull but town, then thats not really good town play.
Who knows what will happen in the next few days we may go on a streek and hit scum back to back.
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 10:17 am
by killa seven
armlx wrote:
Didn't Tar say something similar and turn out town? (Yes, he did.)
Yes, and there was a reason he was blown up for it. 1st off, layers and layers of WIFOM. Second, suicidal people are rarely mafia kills.
I would think the scum would want to give the bomb to lurkers who really dont know whats going on in the game, vs giving the bomb to someone whos a stronger player.
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 10:25 am
by armlx
Less restrictive than a normal deadline.
Hardly. You are restricting our choices without considering future events.
I would think the scum would want to give the bomb to lurkers who really dont know whats going on in the game, vs giving the bomb to someone whos a stronger player.
I'm now convinced K7 needs to die now/soon.