Mafiascum.net

In post 6971, RadiantCowbells wrote:Loftwing (3): Taly, Not Known 15, VP Baltar

---> Now (7) with Taly, Not Known 15, VP Baltar, Sakura, Good Luck Buddy, Ydrasse

Good Luck Buddy wrote:Sakura looks absolutely glorious when she's leading the charge against some random bad guy

In post 6987, Not Known 15 wrote:

In post 6876, Not Known 15 wrote:

In post 588, Loftwing wrote:

In post 586, Toogeloo wrote:Do I nuke the Miller claim?

Please don't. I actually got an enjoyable role this time, and I didn't wait a month or so just to die less than 24 hours into the game for literally doing what you're supposed to do as a miller.

(Also, it starts to carve the precedent that Millers should shut the hell up when they roll miller, less they be eaten alive by the other players for doing what is optimal for millers to do.)

In post 2120, Loftwing wrote:I mean, I was rather meh that the mod gave me such a bland and game-balanced role.

In post 2136, Loftwing wrote:

In post 2135, Deimos27 wrote:

In post 2131, Loftwing wrote:I don't know why you'd be scunreading me based on my claims.
Also, you can just point to games where I was town and say that I was more active there, but what about scum games?

I've said this before and I'll say it again:

The purpose of Meta isn't to justify an execution on a player. The purpose of Meta isn't to get others to execute a player.
Meta is most useful to determine where you should be looking for scum.
Meta is not a Compass, which points at scum, Meta is a Map, which shows where scum might be.

If it doesn't make sense that your flavour claim could be given the miller role then it obviously stands to reason that one would assume you are lying.
The point about needing to look at scum games also, when it comes to meta, is valid

To be honest, the initial role I got didn't make much sense, but I assume that the mod designed my role with balance in mind, which is why I was millerized.

This just doesn't make sense at all. Loft is lying about their role.

In post 7013, Taly wrote:im still open to a yeet on

t3

but i feel we could leash

they target

ss/enchant

for something that isnt a protection? if they are attached

idk, i get its WIFOM but if

t3

is so dependent on someone else why hasnt the scumteam done something about it

In post 7009, Loftwing wrote:but for some reason my role has changed to DkKoba's. Dunno about why tho.

In post 7016, Sakura Hana wrote:

In post 7013, Taly wrote:im still open to a yeet on

t3

but i feel we could leash

they target

ss/enchant

for something that isnt a protection? if they are attached

idk, i get its WIFOM but if

t3

is so dependent on someone else why hasnt the scumteam done something about it

Presumably he's actually lying about needing to be dependant on someone else and has been doing stuff.
Or he's lying about not being attached already.
If he's scum there's a lot of things he could be lying about.

In post 1291, RadiantCowbells wrote: DkKoba was

XrCyclone

.

Spoiler: Role PM

Welcome, DkKoba. You are XrCyclone, Obvious Cheater. You are a Helper-Requesting Cheater.

I claim random informed role that I have no way of knowing about!

Thought (Helper-Requesting): Each night you may target a player not in the game, inviting them to be able to discuss the game with you.
Cheater! (Cheater): You may discuss the game during days and nights with every player who accepted your invitation until the end of the game.

You win when the Mafia have been removed or nothing can prevent this from happening.