Page 30 of 38

Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 7:57 pm
by Mark Z Danielewski
Oh no you don't.
OscarWilde wrote:Okay, so night results. I can conf-town three people right now.
OscarWilde wrote:(I should make some corrections. I am actually a "Flavor Cop". I get just your role, not your alignment.)

Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 8:06 pm
by OscarWilde
OOC: God and Kaufman are conf-town. God is a neighborizer and I'm pretty sure that he targetted Kaufman. Based on:

Charlie Kaufman wrote:Author's Note: Danielewski is pretty much confirmed town.
So is God.





VOTE: Gertrude Stein

Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 8:11 pm
by Mark Z Danielewski
Since when do neighborizers make anyone confTown?

Where is your third person, at that?

Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 8:18 pm
by OscarWilde
OOC: 1-Shot Mafia Neighborizer is as bad as Mafia Fruit Vendor. And if Kaufman was scum he'd have just had God killed at night. I don't actually know that God DID target Kaufman, but I'm assuming so until I'm corrected.

My other result was nurse. Do you want a name?

Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 8:31 pm
by Mark Z Danielewski
Your logic makes no sense. Neighborizer as scum is a fine role. Scout someone's reads, see if they are worthy of killing, try to get them on your side. It's a usually-Town role that works well as scum, and I've seen quite a few scum Neighborizers. 1-shot scum Neighborizer would be a near goon with an ability to confirm that ONE NIGHT he didn't do anything else (if that's the case in this game).

Why would a scum player want to kill someone they know to be a Neighborizer, when they could do so much better hunting elsewhere for PRs?

And no, you should have learned by now that
hinting at the identity of protective roles is bloody stupid
.

Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 8:44 pm
by OscarWilde
OOC: Fair point I guess. I've never seen it come up, and the post from Kaufman came after a kill-less night. I'm getting town out of it. Maybe conf is too strong, but it's more likely than not.

Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 8:46 pm
by Mark Z Danielewski
In case it isn't
blantatly
obvious already, Kaufman is not God's neighbor, anyway.

Please list your results (no names for the nurse please and thank you) for every Night.

Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 8:50 pm
by OscarWilde
N1: Seuss - 1-shot Gladiator
N2: God - No Result due to roleblock
N3: MZB - Doctor
N4: Nurse
N5: God - 1-Shot Neighborizer

Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 8:56 pm
by Mark Z Danielewski
What made you think God was a good target?

Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 9:08 pm
by OscarWilde
OOC: I've been targetting mostly people that I think are a little sketchy. God has been prone to absence, so I got curious. I was more interested in other people N3 and N4, but then I decided I did still want the result and went back for it.

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2013 3:39 am
by Hulk Hogan
Edgar Allan Poe wrote:
Lemony Snicket wrote:I dislike how Phelps deflected Joyce's question, which was a good one as well. However, the rest of his content makes me think he is an innocent.

Lemony Snicket wrote:Phelps looks like an innocent caught up in a tunnel. Now that the choice is between him and Miss Austen, I do not believe that tunnel will be alleviating anytime soon.

Mmmm tasty.

Vote: Phelps

OOC: so because dead scum called me innocent, you think you're on to something?

Are you even reading the game? No. Of course you aren't or you'd have cast your vote against "Hogan" rather than "Phelps." Get to steppin'.

I fruited Shaft last night, by the way.

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2013 4:44 am
by Edgar Allan Poe
Hulk Hogan wrote:Are you even reading the game? No. Of course you aren't or you'd have cast your vote against "Hogan" rather than "Phelps." Get to steppin'.

:igmeou:

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2013 4:45 am
by Edgar Allan Poe
Also, I am inclined to believe that the neighborizer is scum rather than town at this hour.

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2013 6:10 am
by Shaft
I didn't receive any watermelon... I bet longface Lovecraft stole it. Let me ask him and I'll be right back.

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2013 6:50 am
by Shaft
I can confirm I did not get no fruit. Who got my food?! ..... no unvote Poe?

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2013 6:52 am
by Mark Z Danielewski
Edgar Allan Poe wrote:Also, I am inclined to believe that the neighborizer is scum rather than town at this hour.
Explain.

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2013 7:28 am
by EL James
Vote: Rucks


"This man still needs to die a slow painful death. I can do it with some tools I have in my bag, if need be." she states while showing her bag full of bondage materials.

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2013 7:38 am
by Edgar Allan Poe
Shaft wrote:I can confirm I did not get no fruit. Who got my food?! ..... no unvote Poe?

No. I am still unconvinced, and unvoting will not do much. But I am inclined to listen, and if I find a better place for my marker, I shall use it well.

Mark Z Danielewski wrote:
Edgar Allan Poe wrote:Also, I am inclined to believe that the neighborizer is scum rather than town at this hour.
Explain.

All in due time, my dear Danielewski.

But I am waiting to hear who "God" has neighborized, currently.

EL James wrote:
Vote: Rucks


"This man still needs to die a slow painful death. I can do it with some tools I have in my bag, if need be." she states while showing her bag full of bondage materials.

The man is bloody obviously not a criminal, thou wouldst do much better focusing on those that can be criminals.

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2013 7:50 am
by Mark Z Danielewski
Edgar Allan Poe wrote:
Mark Z Danielewski wrote:
Edgar Allan Poe wrote:Also, I am inclined to believe that the neighborizer is scum rather than town at this hour.
Explain.
All in due time, my dear Danielewski.

But I am waiting to hear who "God" has neighborized, currently.
Wow.
Really?


No,
do
explain.

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2013 7:54 am
by Mark Z Danielewski
EL James wrote:
Vote: Rucks


"This man still needs to die a slow painful death. I can do it with some tools I have in my bag, if need be." she states while showing her bag full of bondage materials.
Hai there. If this is your definition of content, please keel over. Start playing already.

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2013 8:07 am
by Mark Z Danielewski
Mark Z Danielewski wrote:
Edgar Allan Poe wrote:
Mark Z Danielewski wrote:
Edgar Allan Poe wrote:Also, I am inclined to believe that the neighborizer is scum rather than town at this hour.
Explain.
All in due time, my dear Danielewski.

But I am waiting to hear who "God" has neighborized, currently.
Wow.
Really?


No,
do
explain.
Let's make this blindingly obvious so that you can quit stalling:

I have a direct line to God. It seems the
house
is next to a church
to the Minotaur
PRAISE HIM
wait wrong flavor again.


Now, explain why you think he's scum and how who God's neighbor is is in any way relevant to this read.

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2013 8:34 am
by Edgar Allan Poe
Mark Z Danielewski wrote:
Let's make this blindingly obvious so that you can quit stalling:

I have a direct line to God. It seems the
house
is next to a church
to the Minotaur
PRAISE HIM
wait wrong flavor again.

Come again, good sir?

Mark Z Danielewski wrote:Now, explain why you think he's scum and how who God's neighbor is is in any way relevant to this read.

It is best not to hurry things along at a faster pace than fate intends them to.

Neither do I really recall me stating that God's neighbor is in any way relevant to his alignment. A curious eye is not always a delving eye, dear friend.

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2013 8:37 am
by Edgar Allan Poe
(I'm assuming you're neighborized with "God", from your attempted "blatant-sy" :roll:)

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2013 8:39 am
by Mark Z Danielewski
You can't be that dense.
I'm God's neighbor. The rest was flavor fluff.

While you didn't say that God's neighbor choice might influence your read, you certainly implied it, and you were definitely postponing explaining that read until you had a claim, so 'curiosity' cannot be used as an excuse. And you're not explaining why you think God is scum. You made the statement, you've been called to answer for it. Stop stalling.

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2013 8:40 am
by Edgar Allan Poe
OscarWilde wrote:OOC: 1-Shot Mafia Neighborizer is as bad as Mafia Fruit Vendor.

Yes, let's all speculate on what abilities the criminals have, and attempting to outguess what mastermind plans our gracious host has planned. That is so clever!