Open 500 - Popcorn Mafia: Game Over!

don_johnson · Post Post #725 (ISO) » Fri May 31, 2013 4:24 am

a) i said: wisdom thinks jacob is scum.

b) wisdom says: you are not reading.

statement was actually correct, but you decided to try and make it sound as if statement a was not correct.

seeing as how you bolded your vote for jacob and have implied all game that your suspicion of jacob was serious, i kind of assume you would continue to bold your "vote".

p-edit:

who would you shoot first?

Wisdom · Post Post #726 (ISO) » Fri May 31, 2013 4:25 am

You said that all you got from me was "Jacob is scum" while I have given two stronger scumreads. So I assumed you didn't read. I tried nothing.
I "bolded" my vote in RVS, since then I have not used the fake votes at all because they're useless.

I'd shoot bork if I had the gun right now.

don_johnson · Post Post #727 (ISO) » Fri May 31, 2013 4:29 am

i saw no differentiation between your reads.

i see what TIP was saying there. i don't have an issue with that train of thought. he wasn't suggesting a policy lynch. he was just making a grand assumption as to why and how the scumteam would choose a gunbearer. certainly food for thought imo.

bork has yet to excite me. so that's fine.

how do we get jacob involved?

Wisdom · Post Post #728 (ISO) » Fri May 31, 2013 4:31 am

I don't think we can.

don_johnson · Post Post #729 (ISO) » Fri May 31, 2013 5:17 am

hm.

oil: shoot bork

notscience · Post Post #730 (ISO) » Fri May 31, 2013 5:50 am

AA9, when there are people posting a fair amount and the amount acting even remotely scummy does not equal the amount of scum in the game, you go to lurkers. Which I did. I'd also expressed nervousness about TIP, for simple reasons I've already said. DJ as well. I'm not sure where you get the notion Wisdom and I have the same scumlist, but it is true I townread him. Why? He was having the exact same thoughts as me at the same time. Rofl.

Fegelein · Post Post #731 (ISO) » Fri May 31, 2013 8:13 am

OK, ArcAngel goes further up my scum list.

Wisdom · Post Post #732 (ISO) » Fri May 31, 2013 8:17 am

TheIrishPope · Post Post #733 (ISO) » Fri May 31, 2013 10:02 am

Oil I miss you

notscience · Post Post #734 (ISO) » Fri May 31, 2013 11:23 am

Why is TIP constantly trying to be a kiss-up?

Wisdom · Post Post #735 (ISO) » Fri May 31, 2013 11:23 am

Guess.

TheIrishPope · Post Post #736 (ISO) » Fri May 31, 2013 11:29 am

Because I have nothing else to say
Did I guess right?

Wisdom · Post Post #737 (ISO) » Fri May 31, 2013 11:31 am

Not what I had in mind, but this is correct too

TheIrishPope · Post Post #738 (ISO) » Fri May 31, 2013 11:32 am

Tell me what you had in mind

notscience · Post Post #739 (ISO) » Fri May 31, 2013 11:36 am

In post 738, TheIrishPope wrote:Tell me what you had in mind

It's along the lines of

Scum trying to make himself as nice and non-killable as possible by kissing up.

Wisdom · Post Post #740 (ISO) » Fri May 31, 2013 11:39 am

That ns, always knowing what I'm thinking

TheIrishPope · Post Post #741 (ISO) » Fri May 31, 2013 11:40 am

Wouldn't you agree that Town does the same thing?

notscience · Post Post #742 (ISO) » Fri May 31, 2013 11:41 am

In post 741, TheIrishPope wrote:Wouldn't you agree that Town does the same thing?

Everyone does it, scum make it more blatant.

TheIrishPope · Post Post #743 (ISO) » Fri May 31, 2013 11:44 am

Mmmmmkay
Wouldn't you agree that kissing up sarcastically as I did, then, would be a null tell, and not a scum tell?

notscience · Post Post #744 (ISO) » Fri May 31, 2013 11:46 am

In post 742, notscience wrote:
scum make it more blatant
.

No, I wouldn't agree.

TheIrishPope · Post Post #745 (ISO) » Fri May 31, 2013 11:55 am

What is your definition of blatant?
Also, do you believe sarcasm is a scumtell?

notscience · Post Post #746 (ISO) » Fri May 31, 2013 11:58 am

Obvious, out in the open.

No, because I do it regardless of alignment. Sarcasm is a good way to get out frustration that town has, yet can be used by scum as well. Hence, null.

TheIrishPope · Post Post #747 (ISO) » Fri May 31, 2013 12:04 pm

So it logically follows that my post was null to you, correct?

notscience · Post Post #748 (ISO) » Fri May 31, 2013 12:59 pm

In post 747, TheIrishPope wrote:So it logically follows that my post was null to you, correct?

Wrong. I read it as you being a kiss up. Not sarcasm. Hence, scumread.

TheIrishPope · Post Post #749 (ISO) » Fri May 31, 2013 1:58 pm

I see
Interesting you would say that